Profile
Semyon Puzyrevsky, known to fans as puz2010, is a titled player who earned the FIDE Master title from FIDE. He thrives in rapid and online formats, pairing creative intuition with solid technique. Off the clock, Puzyrevsky is known for his wit and approachable demeanor, making him a favorite on streams and in club rooms alike.
Preferred time control: Rapid. For a quick glance at his public presence, you can check the placeholder profile link: Semyon Puzyrevsky.
Career Highlights
- FIDE Master title earned from FIDE.
- Notable peak in Blitz around the high 2900s and sustained strong performance in Rapid.
- Regular competitor in Rapid and Blitz circuits with a growing online footprint.
- Known for a lively, sometimes humorous approach that keeps spirits high at the board.
Playing Style and Openings
Puzyrevsky favors dynamic, initiative-rich play in faster formats and a versatile, solid setup in longer games. His repertoire blends aggressive gambits with reliable structural systems. Notable lines he enjoys include:
- Amar Gambit
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation
- Caro-Kann Defense
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation
- English Opening and other flexible setups
- Czech Defense
Notable Games
Sample game PGN (corrected and simplified):
Note: This is a representative sequence demonstrating his Ruy Lopez style and is not a record of a specific over-the-board game.
Character and Philosophy
Beyond the board, Puzyrevsky enjoys puzzles, a good joke, and the camaraderie of fellow players. His blend of quick thinking and practical testing of ideas keeps his games entertaining to study and fun to watch. Puzyrevsky embodies the spirit of a modern chess player: ambitious, approachable, and always ready for the next tactical skirmish.
Strengths and what you’re building on
Semyon, you’re developing a sharp, initiative-driven style in several openings. You seem comfortable taking the initiative with active piece play, quick development, and lines that aim to seize the center and open lines for rooks and queens. Your results show you’re most comfortable when you can pressure the position and force your opponent to defend rather than settle into a passive setup.
Across your recent games, you’ve shown resilience in complicated middlegames and a willingness to convert dynamic chances into wins. This is a valuable asset in rapid time controls, where maintaining initiative and creating threats can tilt positions in your favor even when material is roughly balanced.
Opening performance snapshot
Your openings indicate a strong preference for dynamic, attacking setups. Here are highlights and areas to tighten:
- Top performing families include lines that aim for quick development and active piece play. These are good fits for your style and give you opportunities to keep pressure on opponents early in the game.
- Consistent success with aggressive or unbalanced lines suggests you excel when you can dictate the tempo. Continue reinforcing the middle-game plans that follow these openings.
- The Scandinavian Defense shows you struggle more comparatively. This is a natural area to study because it often leads to unbalanced positions where accurate planning is crucial. Target practice against common Scandi themes and typical replies to your preferred White setups.
- Other solid performers include balanced, solid choices that still preserve practical chances. Consider keeping a compact set of reliable lines you’re confident in, so you can rely on them in fast games when time is tight.
Key improvement targets
- Stabilize long-term consistency: work on a small, dependable repertoire for Black against a few White responses (including the Scandinavian and a common club-white set you face often). This helps reduce fluctuation over months.
- Endgame conversion: aim to simplify when you have the initiative or a clear activity edge, so you can convert advantages into wins rather than chasing imbalanced positions late in the game.
- Time management: in rapid, use a quick evaluation method to decide when to simplify, when to complicate, and when to trade into a favorable endgame. Practicing 15-20 minute practice games focused on early decision-making can help.
- Counter the weaker openings: deepen your understanding of the Scandinavian and similar setups by studying typical plans for both sides, with an emphasis on piece coordination and safe king positions.
Time management and endgame conversion
In rapid play, managing the clock and converting advantages are critical. Your games show you frequently reach complex positions where precise technique matters. Strengthen your ability to recognize when to simplify to a known endgame and when to maintain tension for tactical chances. Regular endgame practice—especially rook endings with active rooks and pawns on both sides—will pay off in converting more of your edge into wins.
Practice plan to implement next 4 weeks
- Repertoire consolidation: pick 3 Black responses (for example, Caro-Kann main line, a solid Scandinavian approach, and a flexible defense) and 2 White systems you enjoy. Build quick, repeatable plans for the first 15 moves and common middlegame motifs.
- Opening study blocks: dedicate 3 sessions per week to drilling typical middlegame ideas from your top openings, including typical pawn structures, piece coordination, and common tactical motifs you’re likely to encounter.
- Endgames and simplifications: practice rook endings and minor piece endings starting from positions with clear imbalances. Start from 10-15 minutes per game to simulate rapid time pressure.
- Tactical training: solve 15–20 puzzles daily focusing on patterns that occur in your preferred openings (pin plays, double attacks, and typical sacrifice ideas to open lines).
- Game review cadence: annotate at least 1 game per week with a focus on missed opportunities to convert advantages and on identifying moments where a different plan could have been faster or safer.
Notes on the recent performance indicators
Your strength-adjusted win rate is around the middle of the pack, indicating you’re performing reasonably well against a broad field but there is room to gain ground. The data also show noticeable short-term momentum in the last couple of months, balanced by longer-term fluctuations. Use this as motivation to lock in a stable, repeatable routine and avoid over-ambitious lines that can backfire under time pressure.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Polina Shuvalova | 4W / 3L / 2D | |
| 0817chess | 3W / 0L / 2D | |
| Quoc Hy Nguyen | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ixcii | 2W / 1L / 1D | |
| Adam Kozak | 2W / 5L / 0D | |
| Noah Thomforde-Toates | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Alexie | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| itsneverluckbro | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| mawrld0 | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| koroshalizadegan | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| metallicat-rus | 54W / 13L / 4D | |
| georgra | 34W / 7L / 0D | |
| dazzlinganomaly01 | 11W / 14L / 5D | |
| rakitic2010 | 8W / 14L / 1D | |
| Oleksandr Bortnyk | 5W / 16L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3022 | 2946 | 2328 | 1788 |
| 2024 | 2638 | 2737 | 2272 | 1685 |
| 2023 | 2442 | 2490 | 2277 | 1695 |
| 2022 | 2259 | 2449 | 2265 | 1703 |
| 2021 | 1898 | 1631 | 2024 | 1681 |
| 2020 | 1656 | 2147 | 1893 | 1781 |
| 2019 | 1645 | 2101 | 1997 | 1499 |
| 2018 | 1515 | 1856 | 1916 | |
| 2017 | 1592 | 1744 | 1494 | |
| 2016 | 1386 | 1547 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 826W / 454L / 85D | 743W / 497L / 117D | 74.4 |
| 2024 | 714W / 581L / 116D | 625W / 659L / 123D | 71.7 |
| 2023 | 132W / 101L / 8D | 120W / 108L / 7D | 36.9 |
| 2022 | 320W / 197L / 28D | 303W / 213L / 26D | 43.1 |
| 2021 | 184W / 106L / 9D | 167W / 123L / 8D | 13.1 |
| 2020 | 177W / 98L / 27D | 172W / 111L / 22D | 67.5 |
| 2019 | 247W / 200L / 25D | 245W / 195L / 33D | 66.3 |
| 2018 | 104W / 61L / 8D | 96W / 68L / 8D | 76.1 |
| 2017 | 91W / 57L / 11D | 85W / 75L / 5D | 70.5 |
| 2016 | 70W / 51L / 6D | 57W / 65L / 7D | 63.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 221 | 135 | 74 | 12 | 61.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 124 | 71 | 46 | 7 | 57.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 109 | 61 | 42 | 6 | 56.0% |
| Australian Defense | 91 | 57 | 30 | 4 | 62.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 77 | 38 | 34 | 5 | 49.4% |
| French Defense | 77 | 53 | 22 | 2 | 68.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 51 | 32 | 18 | 1 | 62.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 51 | 33 | 16 | 2 | 64.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 50 | 29 | 18 | 3 | 58.0% |
| Czech Defense | 50 | 29 | 16 | 5 | 58.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1580 | 896 | 675 | 9 | 56.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 251 | 127 | 100 | 24 | 50.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 154 | 86 | 50 | 18 | 55.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 151 | 75 | 62 | 14 | 49.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 148 | 81 | 57 | 10 | 54.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 114 | 65 | 40 | 9 | 57.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 104 | 57 | 38 | 9 | 54.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 104 | 58 | 40 | 6 | 55.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 100 | 54 | 39 | 7 | 54.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 91 | 51 | 32 | 8 | 56.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 44 | 29 | 0 | 60.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 46 | 31 | 11 | 4 | 67.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 43 | 20 | 16 | 7 | 46.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 28 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 70.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 17 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 47.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 15 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Indian Defense: Schnepper Gambit | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 112 | 64 | 41 | 7 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 58 | 37 | 18 | 3 | 63.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 53 | 35 | 16 | 2 | 66.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 43 | 27 | 13 | 3 | 62.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 42 | 26 | 11 | 5 | 61.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 35 | 15 | 17 | 3 | 42.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 32 | 11 | 20 | 1 | 34.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 25 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 64.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 22 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 22 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 72.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 4 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |