Profile snapshot
Shaolong Du is a titled chess player who earned the National Master title from National. Renowned for a fearless, fast-paced style, they excel in bullet and blitz where quick decisions matter. A strong improviser, Shaolong enjoys the thrill of rapid games and carries that energy into longer events as well.
Preferred time control: Bullet.
Career highlights
- National Master title awarded by National.
- Peak Blitz rating: 2758 (2024-12).
- Peak Bullet rating: 2808 (2025-05).
- Longest winning streak: 12 games.
- Active presence across Blitz, Rapid and Bullet circuits with consistent improvement from 2022 through 2025.
Playing style and philosophy
Du is known for his endurance in long games and tenacious endgame play. Endgames make up a large portion of his battles, and he thrives on turning small advantages into victories. His comeback rate is high, reflecting resilience in the face of adversity. He blends sharp tactics with solid fundamentals, maintaining steady pressure in the late middlegame.
Opening repertoire
In blitz and bullet alike, Du often starts with 1.e4, establishing an aggressive, open style. He shows versatility across many defenses, with frequent successes in the Sicilian Dragon/Accelerated Dragon, Caro-Kann, French, and a range of modern systems. His results emphasize a willingness to explore dynamic lines while remaining solid in quieter setups when needed.
Personality on the board
Off the board, he’s known for a warm grin and a stubborn refusal to abandon a good endgame. He treats every bullet game as a chess sprint—fast, focused, and oddly poetic in how a ticking clock can become a better teacher than any grandmaster lecture.
What Shaolong is doing well in bullet games
You show a healthy willingness to enter sharp, tactical positions where your initiative can pry open your opponent’s defense. In several recent bullets you’ve kept pressure on the opponent’s king and looked for forcing moves, which is a strong mindset for rapid games.
- You often choose active, piece‑play focused plans rather than passively waiting for mistakes, which helps you create practical chances even when positions are unbalanced.
- Your openings demonstrate a comfort with dynamic structures, allowing you to steer into lines where you can generate quick imbalances and keep opponents on their back foot.
- You maintain a willingness to calculate concrete ideas and seize tactical opportunities when they arise, which is a valuable skill in time‑pressure situations.
Key improvements to focus on for faster, cleaner bullets
- Time management: bullet favors simple, fast decisions. When you’re under a clock, try to identify 2–3 candidate moves and select the one that keeps the most solid structure. If a tactic isn’t clearly winning or losing within a couple seconds, default to a safe, forcing move or a simple developing move that improves your position.
- Calculation discipline: in tight tactical clashes, pause to check if there is a simpler, safer line that preserves or gains material. Build a quick “checklist” before committing to a sharp tactic: is material balance favorable, is my king safe, and are my rooks connected or active on open files?
- Endgame readiness: many bullets end in simplified endgames or rough rook endings. Strengthen conversion by practicing basic rook endings and king‑and‑pawn maneuvers. If you can simplify to a known win or hold a draw in a king+rook ending, you’ll convert more often when time is short.
- Positional awareness in dynamic lines: while you want initiative, also watch for overextension. If you push too far without adequate support, you can create weaknesses that your opponent can punish in a few moves.
Opening approach for bullet: reliable, repeatable plans
Your data shows strong results with several aggressive, dynamic ideas. For bullet, consider consolidating to a compact, repeatable repertoire so you spend less time choosing moves and more time applying pressure.
- Choose 1–2 solid, well‑understood lines from your most successful openings (for example, a modern defense setup and a flexible, tactical line from the other side). This reduces decision time and lowers the risk of early tactical missteps.
- Prepare a simple plan for those openings: develop the knights and bishops to natural squares, contest the center, and connect the rooks on open files. Have 1–2 standard thematic pawn pushes ready to create early imbalances without overextending.
- For opponents who push into sharper sidelines, rely on quick, principled moves rather than trying to force complex calculations on the clock. A solid developmental sequence plus a timely tactical break is often enough to keep you in a good practical stance.
Two‑week practice plan to accelerate improvement
- Daily tactics: 15–20 minutes of short puzzles (3–5 moves) focused on quick recognition of forcing moves and common tactics in your active openings.
- Opening repertoire study: 2 short sessions per week, 20–30 minutes each, to reinforce the chosen 1–2 lines, including typical middlegame plans and common traps to avoid.
- Endgame drills: 2 sessions per week, 20 minutes each, focusing on rook endings and king‑and‑pawn endings that appear in bullets.
- Post‑game review: after each bullet game, write 1–2 turning points you misjudged and a corrective plan (e.g., “instead of chasing a tactic, keep the pawn structure intact and improve piece coordination”).
Practical tips for faster improvement
- Use a fixed pre‑move routine in openings to save time: confirm development, then decide on a plan for the next few moves.
- Aim to keep the position as clear as possible when ahead: exchange pieces to reduce counterplay and convert material advantages methodically.
- When behind on clock, lean on standard, solid plans rather than flashy tactics that require deep calculation under pressure.
- Keep a small notebook of typical bullet pitfalls you’ve encountered (e.g., over‑extension, neglecting king safety) and review them weekly.
Next steps and encouragement
With your recent rate of improvement, continuing a focused, efficient bullet practice routine should yield steady gains. Keep applying a simple opening plan, tighten time management, and reinforce endgame conversion. If you’d like, I can tailor a 2‑week bullet curriculum around your preferred openings and provide a structured puzzle set aligned to your typical tactical themes.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| trickertiger | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| arm-sam | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| Alfredo Asaf Rivera Pérez | 2W / 1L / 1D | |
| markovian2012 | 5W / 1L / 1D | |
| Hoang Minh Tho Do | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| rychessmaster1 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| kleim0 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| mysticalchesslegend | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| litoralbetico | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| needattention02 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 12W / 19L / 4D | |
| vqbt-tpnd | 12W / 16L / 1D | |
| rvsp16 | 11W / 12L / 1D | |
| coryives | 5W / 11L / 2D | |
| Stevan Djordjevic | 5W / 11L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2801 | 2749 | 2401 | |
| 2024 | 2505 | 2634 | 2394 | |
| 2023 | 2539 | 2374 | ||
| 2022 | 2501 | 2489 | 1969 | |
| 2020 | 2093 | 2153 | ||
| 2018 | 1773 | 2158 | ||
| 2017 | 2101 | |||
| 2016 | 1867 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 374W / 347L / 66D | 329W / 380L / 75D | 87.9 |
| 2024 | 677W / 668L / 162D | 587W / 746L / 174D | 85.4 |
| 2023 | 116W / 107L / 25D | 107W / 120L / 27D | 81.4 |
| 2022 | 163W / 107L / 25D | 140W / 135L / 14D | 79.3 |
| 2020 | 57W / 30L / 5D | 50W / 30L / 8D | 73.2 |
| 2018 | 6W / 3L / 0D | 8W / 2L / 0D | 67.3 |
| 2017 | 3W / 0L / 1D | 3W / 0L / 0D | 83.1 |
| 2016 | 4W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 2L / 0D | 69.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 1009 | 370 | 530 | 109 | 36.7% |
| Czech Defense | 526 | 224 | 256 | 46 | 42.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon | 364 | 183 | 143 | 38 | 50.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 357 | 177 | 157 | 23 | 49.6% |
| French Defense | 319 | 161 | 113 | 45 | 50.5% |
| Modern Defense | 273 | 108 | 138 | 27 | 39.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 216 | 113 | 82 | 21 | 52.3% |
| Australian Defense | 197 | 70 | 98 | 29 | 35.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 141 | 59 | 71 | 11 | 41.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 124 | 54 | 54 | 16 | 43.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Czech Defense | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Modern Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 88 | 52 | 36 | 0 | 59.1% |
| French Defense | 48 | 27 | 20 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 34 | 14 | 17 | 3 | 41.2% |
| Australian Defense | 24 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 54.2% |
| Czech Defense | 24 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 22 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 21 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 61.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon | 20 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 65.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 18 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 70.6% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 1 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |