About Jude Shearsby
Jude Shearsby is a titled chess player who has earned the FIDE Master title from FIDE. Known for a fearless Blitz spirit, they blend sharp tactics with stubborn defense when the clock starts to scream. Jude’s journey is a testament to steady study, late-night online battles, and a willingness to embrace chaos on the board for a good, dramatic finish.
Career Highlights
Across Blitz, Bullet, and Rapid play, Jude has built a reputation as a versatile fighter with a knack for surviving the most chaotic minutes. Their peak Blitz rating reached 2671 on 2024-12-17, a moment that showcased precision amid a flurry of moves. In Bullet, the sparkle was even brighter, with a peak around 3034 on 2025-06-05. A long-running streak of triumphs is part of the lore, including a longest winning streak of 54 games and a celebrated habit of turning tight squeezes into winning endings.
Opening repertoire
Jude thrives in dynamic positions where evaluation swings with every tempo. In Blitz, a well-worn set of choices keeps opponents guessing:
- Amazon Attack: 575 games, 320W‑224L‑31D (WinRate 55.65%)
- Caro-Kann Defense: 180 games, 102W‑68L‑10D (WinRate 56.67%)
- Sicilian Defense: 178 games, 100W‑67L‑11D (WinRate 56.18%)
- Unknown Opening*: a surprisingly frequent toolkit in practice with a strong showing (WinRate 76.33%)
*Unknown Opening* reflects Jude’s willingness to explore offbeat paths and keep opponents on their toes.
Playing style and approach
Jude’s style blends tactical skirmishes with practical endgames. They excel in endgame frequency—often steering complex middlegames toward resilient finishes. In Blitz, they prize speed and accuracy in equal measure, turning clock pressure into an asset rather than a hindrance. A habit of clutch performances under time pressure has earned Jude a reputation for staying cool when the heat rises.
Time controls and training mindset
Preferred time control is Blitz, where Jude’s fearless, fast-thinking approach shines. The daily regimen combines practical play with targeted study of openings and endgames, a combination that supports growth across all fast time controls. When not playing, Jude often revisits critical moments from past games to refine patterns and avoid repeat mistakes.
Further notes
Jude’s career is marked by a blend of tradition and experimentation, a trait that keeps the chess community watching closely. Their ongoing pursuit of improvement is as evident in opening experimentation as it is in endgame technique, and their humorous, down-to-earth perspective keeps the game enjoyable for teammates and spectators alike.
Visuals and benchmarks
What you’re doing well
- You’re capable of generating practical chances in blitz and converting some of them into favorable outcomes. This shows good momentum when you spot the right tactical ideas and timing.
- You’re comfortable trying a range of openings. This flexibility helps you fight for initiative and keeps opponents guessing in fast games.
- You show clear tactical awareness when the position opens up, and you can press for activity rather than defaulting to passive lines.
Key areas to improve
- Time management under blitz pressure: aim to make strong, solid choices quickly and reduce the number of candidate moves you consider in the moment. Practicing timed drills can help you keep a comfortable clock balance in crucial middlegame moments.
- Consistency over longer bursts: short-term gains are good, but work on maintaining a steady plan from opening to endgame. Develop a simple middlegame plan for each main opening you use and stick to it rather than chasing speculative tactical ideas every game.
- Opening consolidation and plan clarity: adopt a compact, reliable structure in your main openings. This reduces early mistakes and gives you clearer middlegame targets, which is especially helpful in the faster tempo of blitz.
- Post-game review habit: after blitz sessions, note 2–3 key moments and what you would change next time. Focus on one recurring theme each week (for example, handling early king safety, exploiting back-rank weaknesses, or improving piece coordination).
Two-week improvement plan
- Solidify a compact opening setup for your main White and Black responses. Practice these lines in 10–15 blitz games to build familiarity and reduce early decision fatigue.
- Implement time-management drills: play short blitz games with a target to finish the middlegame with at least a few minutes on the clock. After each session, review where you spent the most time and trim choices to your top 3 candidates.
- Do two short tactical drills per day focused on blitz motifs (for example, back-rank pressures, forcing sequences, and common forks). Review solutions with a quick self-explanation to reinforce pattern recognition.
Quick self-check prompts after games
- Where was the turning point where I could have chosen a simpler plan instead of pursuing a tactical idea?
- Did I maintain a clear plan from the opening into the middlegame, or did I get sidetracked by forced lines?
- Where did I feel clock pressure, and what changes can I make to avoid it next time?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| twofoxniel | 3W / 3L / 2D | View |
| feliciano_11 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| spelllingchamp | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| the_sherman_variation | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| ESultanov | 6W / 3L / 1D | View |
| skrzypek1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| estrategiasilenciosa | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| lilillliliillilililillil | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| whalepineapple88 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Emil Risteski | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| TheUnderDog001 | 269W / 272L / 46D | View Games |
| Simone Pozzari | 169W / 189L / 34D | View Games |
| Kent Slate | 43W / 224L / 11D | View Games |
| Ivan Kochiev | 83W / 113L / 32D | View Games |
| iliachess2007 | 94W / 105L / 14D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2717 | 2787 | 2432 | 1331 |
| 2024 | 2651 | 2525 | 2421 | 1400 |
| 2023 | 2381 | 2158 | ||
| 2022 | 2216 | |||
| 2021 | 2352 | 2154 | 1940 | |
| 2020 | 2245 | 2065 | 1888 | |
| 2019 | 1573 | 1770 | 1550 | 1160 |
| 2018 | 1200 | 1474 | 1416 | 1047 |
| 2017 | 1295 | 1230 | 1281 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1891W / 1600L / 176D | 1798W / 1740L / 163D | 76.0 |
| 2024 | 3715W / 2438L / 389D | 3475W / 2641L / 388D | 75.0 |
| 2023 | 237W / 208L / 25D | 233W / 205L / 23D | 83.4 |
| 2022 | 82W / 52L / 8D | 80W / 52L / 8D | 73.8 |
| 2021 | 145W / 103L / 15D | 148W / 99L / 19D | 79.3 |
| 2020 | 335W / 272L / 42D | 338W / 294L / 29D | 73.9 |
| 2019 | 258W / 207L / 45D | 243W / 223L / 40D | 72.8 |
| 2018 | 115W / 78L / 12D | 106W / 84L / 13D | 59.5 |
| 2017 | 198W / 145L / 21D | 172W / 162L / 22D | 66.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 107 | 53 | 38 | 16 | 49.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 88 | 60 | 19 | 9 | 68.2% |
| Australian Defense | 57 | 31 | 20 | 6 | 54.4% |
| Petrov's Defense | 44 | 31 | 10 | 3 | 70.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 27 | 17 | 9 | 1 | 63.0% |
| Modern | 27 | 16 | 10 | 1 | 59.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 25 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 32.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 22 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 21 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 23.8% |
| Elephant Gambit | 20 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 768 | 385 | 342 | 41 | 50.1% |
| Australian Defense | 712 | 375 | 295 | 42 | 52.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 614 | 344 | 237 | 33 | 56.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 351 | 185 | 147 | 19 | 52.7% |
| Unknown | 308 | 192 | 110 | 6 | 62.3% |
| Petrov's Defense | 257 | 144 | 99 | 14 | 56.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 208 | 100 | 88 | 20 | 48.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 199 | 116 | 73 | 10 | 58.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 182 | 101 | 70 | 11 | 55.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 165 | 87 | 68 | 10 | 52.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 1683 | 822 | 763 | 98 | 48.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 1508 | 758 | 675 | 75 | 50.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1254 | 649 | 539 | 66 | 51.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1232 | 724 | 455 | 53 | 58.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 992 | 420 | 513 | 59 | 42.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 954 | 489 | 403 | 62 | 51.3% |
| Unknown Opening* | 828 | 632 | 166 | 30 | 76.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 724 | 360 | 321 | 43 | 49.7% |
| Modern | 677 | 337 | 307 | 33 | 49.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 627 | 337 | 256 | 34 | 53.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Center Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 54 | 0 |
| Losing | 22 | 0 |