Rachidnow: The Evolutionary Chess Experiment
Meet Rachidnow, a chess player whose journey is as intriguing as the twist of a DNA strand. Just like a diligent biologist in a laboratory, Rachidnow experiments with every move, analyzing strategies as if decoding the mysteries of a double helix. Though his records currently read as a blank slate (with streaks of zero and stats that are as mysterious as uncharted genomes), there's an undeniable charm in his resilient spirit to evolve.
Known for taking calculated risks and sometimes making early creative resignations (a natural selection of moves, one might say!), Rachidnow approaches each game with the curiosity of an explorer discovering new species. His tactical awareness might still be in the incubation stage, but his passion ensures that every chessboard battle is a lively experiment in adaptation and survival.
In the grand ecosystem of chess, where every encounter is a chance to grow, Rachidnow is far from deterred by early setbacks. Like a well-adapted organism in a fluctuating environment, he is set to refine his strategies, potentially rising from these humble beginnings to master the art of the game. Stay tuned – this player's evolution could very well emerge as the next big breakthrough in chess biodiversity!
Performance Snapshot
Current blitz trend: steadily above 2000 with a personal best of 1945 (2023-12-21).
Win-rate patterns:
What you already do very well
- Consistent opening repertoire. As Black you confidently steer games into French-type structures (
…e6 …d5) and as White you favour 1.e4 with early d3 setups. This clarity saves you the opening “guess work”. - Tactical alertness under pressure. Several recent victories (e.g. vs. ropan03, move 38…Qc1#) show you can spot mating nets when the position opens.
- Conversion of winning attacks. Notice how against arnster31 you kept pieces near the enemy king and finished with 22.Nxf7# – a model attack on weakened dark squares.
Key areas to focus on next
-
Clock management.
Five of your last six losses were on time, often from equal or better positions (see loss vs. astrokk7). Try:- Adopting a minimum move pace (e.g. never let the clock drop below 20 s in the first 15 moves).
- Using the opponent’s think-time to pre-identify candidate moves – especially in familiar French structures.
- Practising 3-minute games with a 2-second increment to drill faster decision cycles.
-
Queenside pawn breaks in the French.
In both wins and losses you allowed the typical …c5 or …b5 push, but sometimes mishandled the tension. Load a study board and replay the critical sequence from your last loss (moves 31-37 vs. crocian):
Focus on timing the break and the concept of prophylaxis – ask “what is my opponent’s next pawn lever and how do I stop or out-prepare it?” -
Endgame conversion technique.
Games vs. gminsight reached winnable endings but you flagged. Two concrete drills:- Play rook-and-pawn endgames vs. an engine at “easy” and “medium” with only 30 s per side – aim for quick winning plans (Lucena, Philidor).
- Review endings where you still had queens (e.g. vs. gyrohakim, move 26 onwards). Ask: “Is a queen trade into a won rook endgame faster for me?”
Opening fine-tuning ideas
| Colour | Current choice | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| White | d3/King’s Indian Attack structures | Add the sharper 3.d4 against the Sicilian (Open lines) to diversify & practice central pawn breaks. |
| Black | French (…e6 …d5) & occasional Pirc/Modern | Prepare a secondary reply to 1.d4 (e.g. the solid Queen’s Gambit Declined which you already touched in the D50 win). This keeps opponents guessing and deepens your understanding of pawn structure play. |
Action plan for the coming week
- Play 20 blitz games with a strict “move every 5 seconds” rule to break the time-trouble habit.
- Annotate one win and one loss daily; focus on why a decision was made, not just engine scores.
- Solve 20 mixed tactics on “defensive motifs” (pin-breaking, zwischenzug) to complement your current attacking flair.
Encouragement
Your tactical eye and intuitive feel for initiative already place you above the majority of club players. Marry that skill with better time use and a deeper grasp of key structural plans, and pushing past 2200 blitz is realistic in the next few months. Keep the momentum going!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gminsight | 16W / 15L / 2D | |
| morelike1inamillion | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| dukeofanchor | 18W / 6L / 0D | |
| wacktheripper | 52W / 43L / 3D | |
| jimmy2314 | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| drgraant | 3W / 5L / 0D | |
| chanylee | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| musix4me | 6W / 1L / 1D | |
| matthewerw1n | 8W / 1L / 0D | |
| leonardo-ofchess | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| robbie_2008-inactive | 106W / 124L / 10D | |
| whoiskenya1 | 37W / 125L / 5D | |
| arturchessyt | 59W / 93L / 5D | |
| svdreamer | 48W / 77L / 3D | |
| sensein | 64W / 53L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2074 | 1945 | ||
| 2024 | 2021 | 1842 | ||
| 2023 | 2009 | 1945 | 1248 | 1842 |
| 2022 | 2086 | 1945 | 1482 | 1665 |
| 2021 | 2033 | 1882 | 1641 | |
| 2020 | 2074 | 1767 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1599W / 704L / 71D | 1594W / 728L / 63D | 74.3 |
| 2024 | 3301W / 1518L / 136D | 3183W / 1571L / 135D | 71.7 |
| 2023 | 2389W / 1352L / 88D | 2258W / 1448L / 86D | 68.7 |
| 2022 | 1466W / 1075L / 75D | 1449W / 1066L / 79D | 71.3 |
| 2021 | 1975W / 1160L / 64D | 1880W / 1233L / 72D | 68.1 |
| 2020 | 537W / 375L / 16D | 519W / 380L / 18D | 66.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 3864 | 2544 | 1233 | 87 | 65.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3690 | 2377 | 1210 | 103 | 64.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 3197 | 1946 | 1171 | 80 | 60.9% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 2047 | 1287 | 695 | 65 | 62.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1230 | 789 | 404 | 37 | 64.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1121 | 658 | 443 | 20 | 58.7% |
| Czech Defense | 1083 | 676 | 376 | 31 | 62.4% |
| Australian Defense | 784 | 461 | 304 | 19 | 58.8% |
| Alekhine Defense | 747 | 435 | 287 | 25 | 58.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 743 | 465 | 255 | 23 | 62.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 38 | 24 | 13 | 1 | 63.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 35 | 19 | 16 | 0 | 54.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 21 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 64.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Philidor Defense | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown Opening* | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Bird's Defense Deferred | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGD: Falkbeer, Marshall/Nimzowitsch, 4.dxc6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 40 | 1 |
| Losing | 23 | 0 |