Rugved Adavatkar - The Tactical Maestro Known as Rainz
Meet Rainz, a chess player whose journey is a thrilling rollercoaster of ambition, skill, and a dash of cheeky bravado. Starting off with humble beginnings, Rainz climbed the rating ladder with relentless determination, transforming from a humble 1000-something Bullet enthusiast in 2013 to a formidable 2100+ Blitz and 2000+ Bullet player by the mid-2020s.
Early Years - From Casual to Competitor
Like many aspiring grandmasters, Rainz began as a casual player, experimenting with openings like the Saragossa and Queen’s Pawn Opening. Early stats show an average Bullet rating just over 1000, proving that even the most fearsome of warriors once fumbled basic moves (who hasn’t?). Yet by 2015, Rainz’s Bullet rating soared to over 1600, signaling a turning point into a more serious contender.
Rise to Prominence
Rainz’s style is defined by emphasis on long, arduous endgames, boasting an “Endgame Frequency” of over 70%. His games are marathons—not sprints—which explains his impressive average moves per win (about 71 moves), showing patience and strategic depth. Warning: don’t expect an early resignation from this player; Rainz only calls it quits a modest 3.5% of the time, preferring to fight until the last pawn hides.
Noteworthy Strengths
- Tactical Awareness: Rainz has an eye for the comeback with an impressive 83% comeback rate and nearly 50% win rate even after losing a piece. Opponents beware!
- Opening Arsenal: Rainz favors the Saragossa Opening, showing a solid 58% win rate in Bullet with it, and a penchant for the Queen's Pawn in various guises.
- Time Control Prowess: Equally adept at Bullet, Blitz, and Rapid, Rainz maintains peak ratings of 2204 (Bullet), 2116 (Blitz), and 2096 (Rapid). Translation? Lightning-fast reflexes combined with strategic wizardry.
Playing Style & Quirks
Rainz is a relentless endgame gladiator, often grinding opponents down in drawn-out tactical battles. His favorite time for peak performance? The witching hour around 1:00 AM, when his “Tilt Factor” is lowest—guess the coffee kicks or perhaps the ghosts of past champions whisper at this hour!
Recent Highlights
In May 2025, Rainz sealed a dramatic win against oozier using a daring and aggressive line of the Indian Game (ECO A45). His tenacity in the closing phases forced the opponent's resignation on time, a testament to his aggressive yet calculated approach.
Rivalries & Opponent Charm
Rainz’s competitive circle is as colorful as his PGNs. While he has a love-hate ratio with some rivals (some opponents are at 100% win rate, others... not so much), he’s always up for a challenge and eager to prove his skills over the board.
In Conclusion
Whether it’s rapid-fire Bullet matches or lengthier Rapid battles, Rugved “Rainz” Adavatkar has crafted a reputation as a tough, witty, and strategically profound player. Future grandmasters take note: the road to chess glory might just need a pinch of Rainz’s grit, a splash of midnight fuel, and a seriously deep opening arsenal.
Overall feedback
Nice work building a dynamic, tactical style in blitz. The data you shared shows you’re comfortable navigating sharp middlegames and you have the willingness to complicate positions when it suits the moment. In blitz, that kind of willingness is a big asset, but it also increases the risk of overextending or missing a simpler, safer route. The goal now is to sharpen decision-making under time pressure, tighten your opening decisions, and strengthen endgame conversion so your aggressive instincts can stay productive even when the clock is tight.
What you're doing well
- You seek active piece play and look for forcing moves when the position allows. This keeps pressure on opponents and creates practical winning chances in blitz.
- You appear comfortable with a range of openings, including sharper, tactical lines as well as more strategic setups. This versatility is valuable in avoiding predictability and catching opponents off-guard.
- You show resilience in complicated middlegames, aiming to complicate and keep chances alive even after tactical skirmishes. This mindset is important in blitz where one messy moment can snowball into a loss for you or your opponent.
Areas to improve (with concrete ideas)
- Opening discipline under time pressure: Blitz thrives on quick, safe development. Consider a compact, two-pawn push approach in the first 8-10 moves or a small core of lines you’re confident with. This reduces early errors and gives you a clearer middlegame plan.
- Two- to three-move calculation check: After identifying a tactical or aggressive idea, quickly verify that there are no immediate forcing replies for your opponent. If you’re unsure, back away to a safer, developing move rather than chasing a complicated line.
- Endgame conversion: Some blitz losses appear to come from heavy pieces or imbalanced endings. Practice fundamental rook endings, and simple king-and-pawn endgames so you can convert or hold with confidence even when time is short.
- Blunder prevention under time pressure: Develop a habit of a quick “threat check” before each move (What is my opponent threatening? What is my immediate plan? Is my king safe?). This helps avoid impulsive, uncalculated moves when the clock is running down.
- Pattern recognition and motifs: Build a small set of go-to ideas (pins, forks, discovered attacks, back-rank themes, and typical endgame transitions) so you can spot them faster in blitz without exhaustive calculation.
Action plan: practical steps for the next 4 weeks
- Week 1: Repertoire consolidation for Blitz
- Pick two reliable White reply options (for example, a straightforward 1.e4 and a solid 1.d4 line) and study 3 key middlegame plans for each.
- Choose one aggressive line you enjoy and one solid line you trust less risky, so you have a safe fallback.
- Week 2: Tactical stimulus and quick decision-making
- Do 15–20 tactical puzzles daily focusing on forks, pins, skewers, and discoveries.
- After solving, write down in a sentence what the main tactic was and one safer alternative if the tactic backfires.
- Week 3: Endgames under blitz time pressure
- Practice rook endings and basic king-pawn endings with a countdown timer to simulate blitz constraints.
- Review at least two endgames from your recent games and note one improvement you could have made earlier to avoid the endgame altogether.
- Week 4: Post-game review ritual
- For every blitz session, spend 5 minutes after playing to annotate one key mistake and one alternative approach for that moment.
- Track one measurable improvement (e.g., average time per move in the first 10 moves or number of blunders) and aim to improve it by 5–10%.
Opening performance snapshot (high level)
Your openings show a mix of sharp tactical systems and solid setups. In blitz, having a concise, reliable core repertoire is crucial. Consider tightening down to two primary lines you’re comfortable with for both White and Black, and prepare clear middlegame plans for each. This will reduce time spent on recall and help you stay in the flow during fast games.
Practice ideas and quick drills
- Daily 15–20 minute tactical puzzle routine focusing on common blitz motifs.
- Three 10-minute mini-games from a single, well-chosen opening to build familiarity with typical middlegame structures.
- Endgame drill: rook endings with a simplified pawn ending to reinforce conversion techniques.
- Post-game micro-review: pick one blunder or poor decision per game and write a one-line improvement for that moment.
Next steps
If you’d like, I can annotate your recent games move-by-move and point out exactly where a safer alternative would have preserved your position or converted a win. I can also generate a personalized 4-week blitz training plan with targeted puzzles and specific opening lines tailored to your preferred style.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| adrianzinca | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| robinhood966 | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| spartakkkkk | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| muflihnegara | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| artist8888 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| fakecramling | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sleprunleo | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ethan_brollier | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| doesthissuffice | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| foxofgburg | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| roepstoep | 18W / 91L / 10D | |
| mama_roach | 48W / 12L / 2D | |
| TheKnightBefore | 4W / 46L / 0D | |
| jtoth | 2W / 47L / 0D | |
| coolmintzz | 21W / 18L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1961 | 1920 | 1915 | |
| 2024 | 1887 | 2002 | 2032 | 1406 |
| 2023 | 2019 | 2013 | 1872 | 1406 |
| 2022 | 1959 | 1951 | 1965 | |
| 2021 | 1933 | 1882 | 1603 | 1406 |
| 2020 | 1930 | 1865 | 1501 | 1493 |
| 2019 | 1669 | 1796 | 1347 | 1016 |
| 2018 | 1372 | |||
| 2017 | 1786 | 1664 | 1221 | 1564 |
| 2016 | 1851 | 1770 | 1334 | 1649 |
| 2015 | 1684 | 1608 | 1353 | 1533 |
| 2014 | 1518 | 1361 | 1344 | 1455 |
| 2013 | 1101 | 1140 | 1207 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 277W / 244L / 17D | 270W / 257L / 14D | 72.3 |
| 2024 | 429W / 343L / 35D | 417W / 355L / 34D | 72.5 |
| 2023 | 454W / 383L / 51D | 423W / 427L / 40D | 73.9 |
| 2022 | 773W / 561L / 64D | 721W / 625L / 68D | 73.4 |
| 2021 | 1197W / 985L / 119D | 1148W / 1037L / 110D | 72.5 |
| 2020 | 1577W / 1081L / 88D | 1417W / 1247L / 95D | 66.5 |
| 2019 | 264W / 225L / 18D | 247W / 268L / 13D | 64.4 |
| 2018 | 0W / 12L / 0D | 0W / 12L / 0D | 10.7 |
| 2017 | 26W / 27L / 1D | 27W / 30L / 4D | 65.8 |
| 2016 | 431W / 304L / 30D | 379W / 336L / 30D | 70.3 |
| 2015 | 1030W / 865L / 87D | 929W / 945L / 84D | 68.4 |
| 2014 | 639W / 418L / 43D | 559W / 483L / 35D | 71.4 |
| 2013 | 18W / 11L / 1D | 15W / 16L / 0D | 64.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1448 | 770 | 611 | 67 | 53.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 651 | 340 | 285 | 26 | 52.2% |
| Australian Defense | 502 | 257 | 233 | 12 | 51.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 375 | 181 | 178 | 16 | 48.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 307 | 154 | 144 | 9 | 50.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 271 | 147 | 113 | 11 | 54.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 228 | 115 | 100 | 13 | 50.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 215 | 103 | 107 | 5 | 47.9% |
| Unknown | 159 | 78 | 81 | 0 | 49.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 144 | 65 | 75 | 4 | 45.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 2151 | 1207 | 857 | 87 | 56.1% |
| Australian Defense | 1376 | 775 | 559 | 42 | 56.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 947 | 500 | 417 | 30 | 52.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 914 | 506 | 371 | 37 | 55.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 509 | 286 | 204 | 19 | 56.2% |
| Czech Defense | 487 | 234 | 231 | 22 | 48.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 322 | 155 | 151 | 16 | 48.1% |
| Döry Defense | 297 | 153 | 121 | 23 | 51.5% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 278 | 138 | 130 | 10 | 49.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 228 | 107 | 115 | 6 | 46.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 363 | 187 | 158 | 18 | 51.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 149 | 80 | 64 | 5 | 53.7% |
| Australian Defense | 89 | 58 | 28 | 3 | 65.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 76 | 36 | 33 | 7 | 47.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 74 | 36 | 36 | 2 | 48.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 70 | 32 | 33 | 5 | 45.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 58 | 25 | 31 | 2 | 43.1% |
| Slav Defense | 51 | 25 | 21 | 5 | 49.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 44 | 23 | 19 | 2 | 52.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 43 | 25 | 17 | 1 | 58.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 59 | 27 | 25 | 7 | 45.8% |
| Unknown | 51 | 47 | 4 | 0 | 92.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 48 | 29 | 17 | 2 | 60.4% |
| Australian Defense | 39 | 26 | 11 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 39 | 25 | 14 | 0 | 64.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 37 | 17 | 18 | 2 | 46.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 32 | 20 | 11 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 22 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 22 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 22 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 59.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 23 | 0 |
| Losing | 26 | 1 |