Profile: Rasputin_theone
Known across the chessboard as the enigmatic Rasputin_theone, this player has woven a tale of perseverance, astonishing comebacks, and a knack for occasional blunders that somehow charm the spectators.
Journey Through the Years
Starting his blitz journey in 2012 at a modest rating of 982, Rasputin_theone skyrocketed to a peak of 2234 by 2025. His blitz adventures have been long and arduous: over 5,700 games played, with a win rate hovering just under 47% — a testament to toughness and endurance. Despite a near-equal number of losses, Rasputin’s longest winning streak stands proud at 21, a streak probably fueled by equal parts skill and mysterious luck.
The Bullet and Rapid Warrior
When the clock ticks furiously, Rasputin_theone excels. Bullet play has seen flashes of brilliance with a win rate soaring over 68%, playing quick but thoughtful. Rapid chess adds another feather to his cap, boasting a win rate close to 74%, proving this player can also maintain composure when the pace slows down a bit — or at least as much as a chess player named after a mystic can.
Tactical Mastermind or Psychological Enigma?
With an 83% comeback rate and a staggering 100% win rate after losing a piece, it’s clear Rasputin_theone fights till the very end. Endgames are his playground, with nearly 80% frequency, and an average game stretching well into 60+ moves — endurance and patience are key. However, a tilt factor of 8 hints that sometimes the mystic does get a little...questionable. But hey, what great story comes without a little drama?
Playing Style and Personality
Expect early resignations to be quite rare—Rasputin_theone prefers to twist the knife in long, drawn-out battles rather than throw in the towel prematurely (only 0.36%). White seems to be his lucky color with a 50.24% win rate, while Black battles a respectable 44.37%. Not one to shy away from tough spots, every loss he suffers is rarely one-sided, showing his grit.
Rivalries and Relationships
Amongst the many opponents, Rasputin_theone enjoys a mixed bag of results, with some like 'destg' and 'patternsexpert' completely dominated (100% win rate), while others like ‘paul_ekman_mimik_1970er’ remain elusive nemeses. Either way, every encounter is a story, and Rasputin _theone certainly loves keeping things interesting.
Off-the-Board Mystique
Possessing a mysterious flair befitting the name, Rasputin_theone's true power is perhaps psychological — after all, how else do you explain a player with such a dramatic comeback rate and a 100% surge after losing material? The chess world awaits eagerly to see what other secrets this enigmatic figure will unveil at the board. One thing is certain: underestimating Rasputin_theone is a gambit that rarely pays off.
What you’re doing well
You show a willingness to play dynamic openings and keep the game’s tempo forward. In several games you launch active development and seek to seize initiative rather than passively pass through the early moves. This willingness to complicate matters can put pressure on less prepared opponents and creates chances to grab the advantage when opponent inaccuracies appear.
- You handle piece activity and king safety with purposeful planning in the opening, often placing pieces on active squares and coordinating threats.
- Your willingness to switch between different openings demonstrates flexibility and a readiness to adapt to your opponent’s setup.
- You stay resilient in middlegame tactics, finding chances to complicate positions and create practical drawing or winning chances even from sharp lines.
Areas to improve
- Time management in fast time controls: several losses on time indicate you sometimes spend too long on forcing lines or complex tactics. Practice with a steady time budget per move and set a hard cutoff for deep calculations. Learn to choose solid, safe options when you’re low on time and keep the clock pressure challenging for your opponent, not yourself.
- Endgame conversion: after the middlegame, you occasionally reach positions where a small material or positional edge needs precise technique to convert. Focus on common endgame patterns (knight vs bishop endings, rook endings with pawns on one side, and basic king activity) and practice simple conversion drills.
- Defensive calculation: in some games you faced sharp attacks or aggressive pawn storms. Strengthen your defensive toolbox by studying typical defensive plans in the openings you use (how to neutralize pawn storms, how to consolidate king safety, and how to simplify when under pressure).
- Opening depth and consistency: while you’re comfortable with several openings, reinforcing a few core plans in your main lines will help reduce blank spots in the middlegame. Identify a couple of reliable continuations for popular responses and practice the key ideas behind them so you can translate early advantages into tangible results.
Opening choices and practical plan
You’ve shown solid familiarity with a range of openings, including nimble, reactive setups. To sharpen results, lean on a compact, coherent repertoire for your bullet games that emphasizes clear middlegame ideas and king safety. For example, you’ve handled positions arising from flexible systems well; build on that by studying the typical middlegame motifs those systems create (central pawn structures, piece coordination around open files, and timely pawn breaks).
- Pick 1–2 openings you feel most comfortable with and define 2–3 standard middlegame plans for each. Practice these plans in quick training games until they feel second nature.
- When facing common responses, memorize the key move orders that keep your positions solid and reduce the chance of early tactical surprises.
- In the moments after the opening, aim to equalize to a playable middlegame where your active pieces and pawn structure give you practical chances, rather than chasing overly sharp lines that may overextend you in bullet time.
Recommended practice plan
- Time management drills: 15 minutes daily of rapid games (3+0 or 5+0) with a fixed time budget per move, then review to identify where you spent excess time.
- Endgame focus: 2–3 short endgame courses per week (rook endings, minor piece endings, and basic fortress concepts) to improve conversion and resource management.
- Opening reinforcement: choose 2 openings as your primary toolkit and study their main lines and typical middlegame plans for 20–30 minutes each session.
- Post-game review routine: after each bullet game, spend 3–5 minutes noting 1–2 key moments where a different move could have maintained or increased your edge, plus 1 missed defensive resource you could have used.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| zrre | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| followhimnow | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| magnusegesens | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| agu692 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| maciek220 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| espert9 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chessfan1980dk | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| enzoex | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| pamprlajs97 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| cavaloloko288 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| sairamcp | 11W / 11L / 2D | View Games |
| kirenikoloski | 9W / 7L / 1D | View Games |
| devintownsend | 4W / 10L / 2D | View Games |
| rdors | 8W / 6L / 1D | View Games |
| robc2012 | 5W / 9L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2126 | 954 | ||
| 2024 | 2002 | 2223 | ||
| 2023 | 2097 | 2092 | ||
| 2022 | 1854 | 2163 | 2112 | |
| 2021 | 2226 | |||
| 2020 | 2100 | |||
| 2019 | 1754 | 2082 | ||
| 2018 | 2165 | |||
| 2016 | 1949 | |||
| 2015 | 1937 | |||
| 2014 | 1936 | |||
| 2013 | 1989 | |||
| 2012 | 1097 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7W / 18L / 2D | 13W / 12L / 1D | 73.8 |
| 2024 | 149W / 135L / 10D | 123W / 163L / 12D | 72.7 |
| 2023 | 207W / 174L / 24D | 172W / 217L / 26D | 75.0 |
| 2022 | 316W / 288L / 28D | 297W / 308L / 43D | 74.4 |
| 2021 | 251W / 216L / 21D | 231W / 246L / 17D | 71.9 |
| 2020 | 140W / 131L / 24D | 135W / 144L / 19D | 73.7 |
| 2019 | 174W / 163L / 22D | 145W / 200L / 15D | 72.0 |
| 2018 | 59W / 53L / 3D | 52W / 56L / 4D | 70.6 |
| 2016 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 3L / 1D | 81.1 |
| 2015 | 9W / 7L / 0D | 6W / 9L / 1D | 71.9 |
| 2014 | 48W / 45L / 6D | 47W / 46L / 5D | 75.2 |
| 2013 | 104W / 79L / 14D | 96W / 91L / 13D | 72.3 |
| 2012 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 46.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1067 | 525 | 476 | 66 | 49.2% |
| Döry Defense | 358 | 171 | 173 | 14 | 47.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 347 | 174 | 159 | 14 | 50.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 336 | 167 | 154 | 15 | 49.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 232 | 82 | 137 | 13 | 35.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 205 | 74 | 121 | 10 | 36.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 178 | 89 | 76 | 13 | 50.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 160 | 83 | 66 | 11 | 51.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 148 | 68 | 69 | 11 | 46.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 138 | 68 | 61 | 9 | 49.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Mikenas Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |