Meet “Recombinant”
Emerging on the chess scene in 2015, Recombinant has steadily enhanced their repertoire and ratings across multiple time controls. In Blitz, they have soared to a peak of 2544 (achieved in 2022), while their Bullet prowess hit a remarkable maximum of 2506 in the same year. Rapid play, reaching up to 2136, showcases a well-rounded skill set.
Known for turning games around—boasting a comeback rate of over 90%—Recombinant often takes encounters deep into the endgame, with most victories spanning over 80 moves. Their tactical flair is underscored by a longest winning streak of 14 games, balanced with the resilience to keep fighting even when a piece down.
Across their career, Recombinant has tested countless opening systems, from classical main lines to offbeat gambits, with a notable preference for dynamic, complex positions. A self-described competitor who plays on both weekends and weekdays, they maintain a respectable White win rate of nearly 46%, while playing Black at about 40% success.
With a measured tilt factor and a commitment to rated competition, Recombinant continues pushing boundaries in the online chess community. They combine persistent study with entertaining style, making each match a tough, fighting encounter.
Feedback for Benedict Smail
Great job on the recent streak of dynamic wins! Your attacking instincts are obvious and your current peak of 2544 (2022-04-28) shows steady improvement. Below are a few focused areas that can help you climb to the next level.
1. Time Management – the low-hanging fruit
- Five of your last six losses were on time in positions that were still playable or even better for you. Treat the clock as an extra piece:
- Make simple decisions quickly (recaptures, obvious forcing moves).
- Aim to keep ≥45 s on the clock after move 20 in 3-minute games. Use to verify progress.
- When clearly winning, shift to “increment-friendly” techniques: trade queens, avoid complex pawn races, and pre-move safe recaptures.
2. Opening Hygiene
You score well with mainstream setups (e.g., QGD as White, Sicilian vs. 1.e4) but struggle when structure becomes unfamiliar.
- Against Anti-Sicilians (Alapin, Closed): have a ready system (…d5 break vs. Alapin; …e6 & …d5 vs. Closed) so you don’t burn time.
- Queen’s Gambit Declined: in your win vs. honestgirl you used 8.Qd2!? + 10.cxd5. Nice tactical feel, but the light-square bishop got stuck later. Study the model plan ∆Bd3, 0-0, e4 to keep the bishop active.
- Add one new line a week; test it in 5|5 to get reps without severe clock pressure.
3. Tactics & Calculation
- Many decisive moments revolved around missed intermediate moves (Zwischenzug). Solve 10–15 timed puzzles daily focusing on forcing-move trees “check, capture, threat”.
- When pieces swarm the opponent’s king, pause for 5-second blunder-check before executing the flashy sacrifice.
4. Converting Advantages
- In the win vs. TheKnightBefore, you were +6 but allowed counter-play before finishing. Adopt the “Two-step conversion” rule:
- Simplify (trade into a clearly won endgame).
- Push passed pawns only when your king and pieces are maximally active.
- Replay the critical phase quickly:
. Ask: “Where was the safest win?”
5. Endgame Toolkit
Your middlegame attacking skill often leaves you low on endgame mileage. Shore this up:
- Practice basic rook endgames (Philidor & Lucena). Two of your time-forfeit losses could have been drawn with correct rook placement.
- Play thematic endgame sparring (30-move preset rook + 4 pawns vs. rook + 4) with a friend or against bots.
Next Steps
- Track blitz sessions with a 5-minute post-mortem; note one recurring mistake each day.
- Revisit these notes weekly and plug the biggest leak first.
- Check progress in a month via . Aim for +5 % improvement in games finished with >10 s on the clock.
Stay curious and keep the pieces active—looking forward to seeing Benedict Smail break the next rating plateau!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mark Kotliar | 70W / 77L / 17D | |
| 2011KING | 54W / 73L / 7D | |
| Ignacio Raviolo | 48W / 69L / 6D | |
| Michael Baron | 28W / 65L / 11D | |
| Jovan Miletic | 40W / 53L / 9D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2506 | 2505 | ||
| 2021 | 2432 | |||
| 2020 | 2269 | 2319 | ||
| 2019 | 2213 | 2334 | ||
| 2018 | 2269 | 2339 | ||
| 2017 | 2276 | 2225 | 2136 | |
| 2016 | 2305 | 2317 | 1909 | |
| 2015 | 2042 | 2185 | 1888 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 601W / 676L / 163D | 559W / 745L / 158D | 88.4 |
| 2021 | 1627W / 1547L / 372D | 1421W / 1734L / 403D | 86.0 |
| 2020 | 423W / 438L / 89D | 391W / 462L / 106D | 82.7 |
| 2019 | 908W / 877L / 210D | 804W / 945L / 231D | 83.3 |
| 2018 | 937W / 866L / 176D | 814W / 1005L / 173D | 84.3 |
| 2017 | 989W / 962L / 184D | 839W / 1110L / 205D | 83.4 |
| 2016 | 1448W / 1436L / 262D | 1253W / 1617L / 278D | 85.5 |
| 2015 | 1187W / 1181L / 175D | 1037W / 1302L / 194D | 84.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense | 1481 | 731 | 588 | 162 | 49.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 1364 | 666 | 559 | 139 | 48.8% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation | 734 | 295 | 356 | 83 | 40.2% |
| Czech Defense | 718 | 330 | 335 | 53 | 46.0% |
| Modern | 715 | 352 | 316 | 47 | 49.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 709 | 299 | 355 | 55 | 42.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 628 | 252 | 325 | 51 | 40.1% |
| Australian Defense | 612 | 296 | 266 | 50 | 48.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 582 | 210 | 307 | 65 | 36.1% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 582 | 239 | 285 | 58 | 41.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 115 | 57 | 49 | 9 | 49.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 112 | 53 | 53 | 6 | 47.3% |
| Australian Defense | 102 | 45 | 52 | 5 | 44.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 70 | 33 | 35 | 2 | 47.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 69 | 39 | 25 | 5 | 56.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 63 | 33 | 24 | 6 | 52.4% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 61 | 29 | 28 | 4 | 47.5% |
| Czech Defense | 51 | 21 | 27 | 3 | 41.2% |
| Döry Defense | 44 | 11 | 29 | 4 | 25.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 42 | 25 | 17 | 0 | 59.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 4.e3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Modern Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 1 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |