Profile of Riobaldo56
Meet Riobaldo56, a chess aficionado whose game is as deep as a philosophical novel and as thrilling as a rollercoaster ride! Starting from a modest Blitz rating of 1602 back in 2018, this player has aggressively climbed the ranks to an impressive peak of above 2600 in Blitz by 2025. Not just a one-trick pony, Riobaldo56 dabbles in all time formats, including Rapid and the adrenaline-fueled Bullet games, boasting ratings over 2100 and 2500 respectively.
With nearly 10,000 wins under their belt in Blitz alone, balanced with almost as many losses, Riobaldo56 keeps the adrenaline flowing and the competition fierce. Their longest winning streak of 13 games proves you’re never safe when facing them on the board. However, even titans like Riobaldo56 sometimes hit the “pause” button—currently on a respectable break from streaks, but always ready for another chess marathon.
This cunning tactician rarely resigns early (0.47% early resignation rate) and delights in complex endgames, navigating through them in over 76% of their games. True to the spirit of a fighter, Riobaldo56’s legendary 86% comeback rate and perfect win record after losing a piece (100%) make them a nightmare for opponents who ever think an advantage is secured.
While their White pieces tend to enjoy more victories (50.77% win rate) than Black, Riobaldo56’s psychological resilience is admirable, even though their tilt factor stands at 12—reminding us that even grandmasters sometimes grumble about losing a queen.
Off the board, Riobaldo56’s opening strategy remains a well-guarded secret, shrouding their repertoire of over 21,000 Blitz games in mysterious intrigue. Opponents beware: this player’s consistency and vast experience mean you’re likely to be outmaneuvered before you’ve finished your opening moves!
So, if you ever bump into Riobaldo56 online, get ready for a chess experience that mixes razor-sharp tactics with a dash of volatility — and maybe a joke or two while they plot their next checkmate.
Overview of recent rapid games
You’ve demonstrated a solid ability to compete in rapid by handling a diverse opening repertoire and keeping pressure in the middlegame. There were clear moments where you seized opportunities and converted them into advantages. A couple of games showed tactical clashes where your opponent gained the initiative, which is a natural part of rapid chess and provides valuable learning points.
What you’re doing well
- You’re comfortable with a wide opening set, especially in the English Opening family and several Sicilian branches. This flexibility helps you reach playable middlegames against different setups.
- Your pieces often become active quickly, coordinating on open files and diagonals. This gives you chances to press in the middlegame.
- You show resilience and persistence in complex positions, continuing to look for practical chances even when the position is challenging.
Areas to improve
- Time management in the critical middlegame: try to balance calculation with practical choices so you don’t scramble in the last minutes of a game.
- Scanning for tactical threats earlier: keep a quick check for captures, forks, or forcing moves that could swing momentum in your opponent’s favor.
- Endgame conversion: sharpen technique in transitions to king-and-pawn endings and rook endings to turn advantages into wins.
- Opening consistency: while variety is good, having a few well-practiced lines in core openings can reduce early uncertainty and improve early-middle game planning.
Opening notes and plan
Your openings show strength across multiple lines, with strong results in the English Opening family and several Sicilian branches. To keep consistency, consider deepening a few reliable sublines and sticking to clear development plans in the first 10 moves.
- In the English Opening family, aim to develop knights and bishops efficiently and keep a flexible pawn structure to support central breaks. See opening references: English Opening
- In Sicilian areas like the Alapin Variation and Taimanov Variation, focus on solid development and timely central breaks rather than overextending on the wings. See opening references: Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation and Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation
- Practice tactical motifs such as forks, pins, and skewers regularly to strengthen your ability to spot forcing moves in rapid games.
Practice plan
- Daily quick-tactic practice (about 15-20 minutes) focused on forks and pins to improve immediate recognition in rapid games.
- Weekly endgame review: study rook endings and simple king-and-pawn endings to improve conversion in late middlegames.
- Two opening-focused sessions per week: pick a core line from your English or Sicilian repertoire and work through typical middlegame plans and common move orders.
- Review two recent games with a coach or engine to identify a concrete improvement in opening choice and middlegame plan.
Opening spotlight (optional)
Focus areas where you’ve shown promise and where a bit more polish could help next:
- English Opening family – strong performance in several branches. See opening type: English Opening
- Sicilian Defense variants (Alapin, Taimanov, and related lines) – consistent activity with room for improvement in central breaks. See [Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation] and [Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation] highlights: Sicilian Defense
Personal note
Keep leveraging your strengths in piece activity and your flexible opening approach, while tightening time management and endgame technique. If you’d like, I can tailor a short training plan to fit your current practice time and target openings.
Profile and resources
If you want to reference your recent games or share a specific game for review, we can attach a Pgn snippet or a game link in this section using the provided placeholders. For example, you could point to a recent opponent or opening line using internal references: Riobaldo56
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hyoukami | 4W / 2L / 1D | |
| sicilianenjoyer24 | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| countingblunders | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| ialwaysplayb3 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| murdoczek | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| dear-ken-im-in-pieces | 4W / 1L / 0D | |
| res128 | 2W / 1L / 1D | |
| angryjellyfish | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| najdorf_oniy | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| road-to-gm_2028 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ff aa | 34W / 20L / 5D | |
| jazzyatom | 15W / 22L / 7D | |
| GygesI | 23W / 15L / 5D | |
| Nejmeddine Dhaouadi | 23W / 15L / 4D | |
| nimzo31 | 20W / 14L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2505 | 2112 | ||
| 2024 | 2504 | 2507 | 1711 | |
| 2023 | 2496 | |||
| 2022 | 2340 | 1588 | ||
| 2021 | 2405 | |||
| 2020 | 2307 | |||
| 2019 | 2203 | 2410 | ||
| 2018 | 2383 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2035W / 1638L / 420D | 1702W / 1948L / 448D | 77.7 |
| 2024 | 1934W / 1526L / 396D | 1648W / 1819L / 390D | 74.1 |
| 2023 | 348W / 240L / 67D | 262W / 296L / 81D | 72.2 |
| 2022 | 881W / 712L / 143D | 798W / 791L / 124D | 72.5 |
| 2021 | 117W / 85L / 12D | 96W / 87L / 24D | 74.3 |
| 2020 | 199W / 165L / 28D | 172W / 192L / 24D | 69.7 |
| 2019 | 749W / 626L / 109D | 646W / 765L / 83D | 71.3 |
| 2018 | 175W / 142L / 22D | 141W / 173L / 23D | 72.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense: Exchange Variation | 1310 | 740 | 440 | 130 | 56.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1257 | 574 | 555 | 128 | 45.7% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 1134 | 639 | 400 | 95 | 56.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1091 | 468 | 530 | 93 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 887 | 363 | 416 | 108 | 40.9% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation | 879 | 467 | 321 | 91 | 53.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 860 | 356 | 436 | 68 | 41.4% |
| Slav Defense | 835 | 353 | 407 | 75 | 42.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 777 | 361 | 351 | 65 | 46.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 765 | 427 | 257 | 81 | 55.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| English Opening | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense: Czech Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Old Indian Defense: Duz-Khotimirsky Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 4 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |