Salomeja Zaksaite - Woman Grandmaster (WGM)
Known in the chess kingdom as salomez, Salomeja Zaksaite has steadily grown into a formidable force on the 64 squares, earning the coveted title of Woman Grandmaster from FIDE. With a tactical awareness as sharp as a needle in a haystack, Salomeja’s playstyle leans heavily towards deep, enduring endgames—fascinatingly clocking an endgame frequency of over 78%. That's more than just a mere game of chess; it’s a true biological test of endurance and strategy, where every cell of calculation counts!
Salomeja's blitz rating has blossomed from modest beginnings in 2013 to hitting a peak rating of 2417, showing a growth spurt that any budding organism would envy. Even in bullet chess, where reflexes are as quick as nerve impulses, she reaches impressive peaks above 2200, proving her synapses fire both fast and efficiently. Her white pieces enjoy a slightly better survival rate with a 48.85% win rate, while black pieces still hold respectable ground at 42.68%—a balanced immune system of sorts for both sides of the board.
With a longest winning streak of 11 games, she's no stranger to sustained performance, generally winning games with an average of about 71 moves—talk about stamina! And should she lose a piece, Salomeja's comeback rate is an astonishing 87.4%, with a flawless 100% win rate after losing material, displaying resilience that would make even a cockroach jealous.
Off the board, you might find Salomeja striking at games mostly on Monday and Wednesday with over 52% win rates on those days. Intriguingly, the best moment to catch her in action is around midnight (0:00 hour), where her win rate peaks at an amazing 80%. Clearly, her brain cells are most active when the rest of the world sleeps—a classic nocturnal neuron firing!
In summary, Salomeja Zaksaite is a true chess organism, adapting and thriving through years of blitz battles, producing endgame magic and tactical comebacks with biological precision and energy. Her playstyle not only challenges opponents but also provides a thrilling example of the intricate dance between brain cells and chess pieces on the chessboard's genetic code.
Hi Salomėja (“salomez”) 👋
Below is a concise review of your recent blitz games together with practical suggestions to accelerate your progress toward the next rating band. Feel free to revisit this page after every training cycle and tick off the items you have addressed.
1. Quick Snapshot
- Current trend: steady performance vs. 2200-2400, occasional struggles vs. 2500+.
- Typical openings: Queen’s Pawn (g3 systems, Catalan-like setups) as White; Alekhine / Modern / King’s Indian structures as Black.
- Most common result in losses: flagged in an equal or slightly worse position (3 of the last 5 defeats were on time).
- 2449 (2025-06-10) gives you a realistic target—set the next milestone +50 elo above it.
2. What You Already Do Well
- Initiative-first mindset. In your win vs. Aidana Madi you sacrificed the
b-pawn (20.Qxa5!) to grab the initiative and never let go. - Tactical alertness. Nice use of back-rank motifs (23.Rxc8+!) and mating nets (24.Qc6–27.Qh8+).
- End-game technique. In equal rook-and-pawn endings you convert small advantages with good pawn breaks (games on 22 May).
3. Priority Fixes
-
Time management.
• Average remaining time at move 25 in losses: ≈ 6 seconds.
• In wins: ≈ 40 seconds.
Action plan: play two 5-minute sessions per day where you verbally annotate candidate moves but must move with >10 seconds on the clock. Build the habit away from tournament pressure. -
Stalling French Advance positions. The loss vs. Yaroslav Shevchenko highlighted difficulty meeting …c5/Qb6 ideas.
• Add the 30-minute chapter on the Milner-Barry Gambit to your study queue.
• Play at least five training games beginning 1.d4 e6 2.e4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.c3 to test new ideas. - Clarify pawn breaks in Alekhine Defence as Black. In several defeats you allowed White’s space advantage to freeze your pieces. Memorise thematic breaks …c5 and …f6 and rehearse them vs. the engine.
4. Opening Toolkit Upgrades
| Colour | Current Choice | Suggested Addition |
|---|---|---|
| White | 1.d4 & g3 systems | Blend in a main-line Queen’s Gambit (3.Nc3 & 4.cxd5) to become less predictable. |
| Black vs. 1.e4 | Alekhine / Modern mix | Add a solid but dynamic backup—e.g. the French Rubinstein—for tournament variety. |
5. Illustrative Moment
The following key sequence from your latest win shows how quickly the position can turn once the initiative is seized:
Note how Bxg7 removed the last defender, leading to forced weaknesses. Replicate this kind of forcing-move scan in quieter games too.
6. Training Menu for the Next 2 Weeks
- Daily: 15 min of “instant-move” exercise (move within three seconds vs. 2000-rated bot) to fight time pressure.
- 3× per week: solve five intermediate tactics featuring
…c5/…f6breaks in cramped positions. - Weekend: analyse one loss with a friend or coach, focusing only on the first mistake (not the final blunder).
7. Final Thoughts
You are already playing at a strong candidate-master level. Shoring up time usage and ironing out one or two opening holes will likely push you beyond your 2449 (2025-06-10) within a month. Keep the games coming, and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| juliandobrynin | 50W / 10L / 2D | |
| Julian Estrada | 5W / 16L / 2D | |
| Ivan Illiev | 3W / 9L / 3D | |
| Tom Borvander | 7W / 3L / 4D | |
| samuraichessman | 3W / 9L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2358 | |||
| 2024 | 2059 | 2229 | ||
| 2023 | 2136 | 2347 | ||
| 2022 | 2252 | 2320 | ||
| 2021 | 2169 | 2244 | ||
| 2020 | 2053 | 2252 | 1886 | |
| 2019 | 1907 | 2197 | ||
| 2018 | 1975 | 2135 | ||
| 2017 | 1950 | 2145 | ||
| 2016 | 1997 | 2196 | 2173 | |
| 2015 | 1742 | 2097 | 2292 | |
| 2014 | 1828 | 2174 | 2246 | |
| 2013 | 1796 | 2013 | 2203 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22W / 24L / 3D | 20W / 27L / 3D | 74.8 |
| 2024 | 72W / 100L / 10D | 60W / 113L / 7D | 69.3 |
| 2023 | 93W / 120L / 10D | 68W / 136L / 18D | 75.2 |
| 2022 | 156W / 179L / 24D | 136W / 212L / 23D | 75.8 |
| 2021 | 264W / 260L / 40D | 232W / 280L / 56D | 72.4 |
| 2020 | 222W / 197L / 29D | 192W / 225L / 38D | 73.3 |
| 2019 | 99W / 58L / 13D | 88W / 70L / 12D | 71.8 |
| 2018 | 28W / 15L / 1D | 21W / 22L / 2D | 64.8 |
| 2017 | 70W / 62L / 10D | 62W / 68L / 11D | 73.1 |
| 2016 | 103W / 76L / 11D | 97W / 79L / 13D | 71.1 |
| 2015 | 89W / 81L / 10D | 88W / 83L / 13D | 72.1 |
| 2014 | 100W / 61L / 4D | 89W / 61L / 3D | 72.4 |
| 2013 | 39W / 20L / 1D | 36W / 22L / 3D | 65.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 225 | 106 | 106 | 13 | 47.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 210 | 85 | 113 | 12 | 40.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 192 | 80 | 101 | 11 | 41.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 166 | 54 | 96 | 16 | 32.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 165 | 78 | 75 | 12 | 47.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 159 | 77 | 73 | 9 | 48.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 138 | 76 | 57 | 5 | 55.1% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 128 | 48 | 69 | 11 | 37.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 115 | 50 | 60 | 5 | 43.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 107 | 48 | 50 | 9 | 44.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 125 | 59 | 62 | 4 | 47.2% |
| Modern | 52 | 29 | 21 | 2 | 55.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 29 | 16 | 12 | 1 | 55.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 29 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 62.1% |
| Australian Defense | 22 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 19 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 57.9% |
| Czech Defense | 15 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 53.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 13 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 38.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Alekhine-Chatard Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Russian, Smyslov, Main Line, 9...Nb6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Russian, Smyslov, 8.Be2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation, Wolf Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 1 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |