Sammed Shete - International Master
Meet Sammed_Shete, a formidable International Master from FIDE who turns 64 squares into their own personal playground. Armed with a mind sharper than a freshly honed knight's edge and a rating that dances near the 2800 mark in blitz, Sammed's chess journey is nothing short of epic.
Career Highlights & Style
Sammed’s blitz rating soared to a peak of 2848 in early 2024, proving that when the clock ticks down, they tick up. Despite dabbling in bullet and rapid formats, Blitz has always been the battlefield of choice — where Sammed fights with tactical wizardry, impressive comebacks (a remarkable 81% comeback rate after falling behind), and a steady nerve that survives an occasional 'tilt' (a mere 17% tilt factor, almost like meditation in chaos).
Known for loving endgames (76% frequency) and playing long, intense games (an average of 70 moves per win!), this player clearly doesn't believe in rushing towards checkmate. It’s more like a marathon with queens and rooks.
Fun Facts
- White pieces are lucky: Sammed wins about 47% of games with White, but Black struggles not too far behind at 43%.
- Opening repertoire: From the Scandinavian Defense (with a perfect 100% win rate!) to the occasional sneaky Scandinavian Mieses Kotrc Variation, Sammed keeps opponents guessing.
- Streaky: Their longest winning streak reached a fierce 15 games, but even the best face a challenge—Sammed's longest losing streak hit 17 games once. It’s all part of the game!
- Peak performance time? Chess at 7 PM is when Sammed shines brightest, with a win rate touching a remarkable 57%!
- Games count: Over 7,000 blitz games played — that’s a lot of pawns danced across the board.
Recent Notable Game
On June 3, 2025, Sammed clinched a convincing victory against Atom596 in a Queen’s Pawn Opening (Zukertort Variation). Material and time pressure combined into a perfect storm, ending with Sammed’s opponent running out of time. It was a patient, strategic game reflective of their style: careful, tactical, and relentless.
In Summary
Sammed_Shete is a player who blends resilience, sharp tactics, and deep strategical understanding to dazzle on the board. Whether rattling off rapid-fire blitz moves or grinding deep endgames, Sammed embodies the spirit of a true chess warrior — always learning, sometimes stumbling, but mostly checkmating their way into the hearts of fans around the world.
Overall Performance Analysis
Sammed, your recent blitz performances show a strong upward momentum, especially noticeable in the past month with a rating increase of nearly 400 points and a positive trend slope. This indicates significant improvement and effective adaptation during your games. Despite the overall positive trend, the strength adjusted win rate of approximately 47.5% suggests competitiveness against similarly rated or higher rated opponents but also highlights areas where further growth is possible.
Strengths Demonstrated
- Opening Preparation: Your handling of openings like the Queen’s Gambit Declined and Nimzo-Indian Defense systems showed sound understanding, establishing good positions early on.
- Positional Play: You often developed pieces harmoniously and seized control of key squares, as seen in games where you successfully pressured opposing pawns and created dynamic opportunities.
- Endgame Technique: Several victories came from well-executed plans in the late middle game or endgame phase, reflecting solid technique and patience.
- Time Management: Your games ended with time pressure on the opponents many times, suggesting good speed and efficient decision making during blitz.
Areas for Improvement
- Critical Moment Calculations: Some losses indicate difficulties in precise calculation during complex or sharp positions. Focus on tactics training to sharpen visualization and calculation speed.
- Handling Pressure in the Opening: In a few games, your position was challenged early by opponents’ aggressive responses, sometimes leading to cramped positions. Study counter-attacking and flexible opening responses to maintain balance.
- Defensive Techniques: There were instances where slight inaccuracies led to opponents gaining initiative. Working on defensive resources and prophylactic thinking can reduce such vulnerabilities.
- Consistent Endgame Execution: While generally strong, a few endgames against higher-rated players could be improved with focused review of theoretical endgames and technique under time pressure.
Practical Recommendations
- Continue reinforcing your opening repertoire, especially with the lines shown in your recent successful games like the Sammed Shete vs JaackCamel game featuring the Queen’s Gambit Declined with 3.g3.
- Integrate regular tactics puzzles focused on calculation accuracy and pattern recognition to raise your tactical sharpness.
- Analyze your losses deeply to understand the turning points, particularly moments where misjudgments in positional assessment or calculation occurred.
- Explore deeper endgame studies, focusing on rook and minor piece endgames to increase confidence and proficiency during critical closing phases.
- Maintain your positive momentum by balancing intensive study with practical blitz experience to apply ideas effectively under time constraints.
Looking Forward
Your recent rating improvements and solid performance trajectory are encouraging. To sustain and accelerate your progress, continue focusing on both strategic understanding and tactical agility. Combining these improvements with your existing strengths will contribute to a more robust and consistent blitz performance.
Stay motivated, keep analyzing, and enjoy your journey in blitz chess!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Nico Georgiadis | 0W / 4L / 1D | View |
| valio_m1948 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| schachmatttv_tobi | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Nebojsa Djordjevic | 3W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Mathieu Ternault | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Abdulla Kashwani Faisa | 2W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Artem-chess2 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| doktorspi3le | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Ali Farahat | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| wojtekyy | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sankalp Gupta | 83W / 193L / 8D | View Games |
| Vaibhav Raut | 38W / 115L / 6D | View Games |
| Sameer Kath | 60W / 41L / 4D | View Games |
| Tiago Pereira Rodrigues | 55W / 38L / 6D | View Games |
| aakash-dalvi7 | 27W / 46L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2577 | 2664 | 2326 | |
| 2024 | 2581 | 2616 | 2326 | |
| 2023 | 2586 | 2740 | 2326 | |
| 2022 | 2541 | 2602 | 2404 | |
| 2021 | 2590 | 2641 | 2296 | |
| 2020 | 2672 | 2650 | 2054 | |
| 2019 | 2349 | 2545 | ||
| 2018 | 2320 | 2503 | ||
| 2017 | 2157 | 2072 | ||
| 2016 | 2149 | 2140 | 1800 | |
| 2015 | 1533 | 2105 | 1800 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 79W / 56L / 3D | 90W / 66L / 2D | 69.7 |
| 2024 | 105W / 107L / 15D | 79W / 126L / 18D | 83.9 |
| 2023 | 76W / 88L / 12D | 78W / 89L / 6D | 80.6 |
| 2022 | 65W / 84L / 11D | 68W / 76L / 15D | 83.2 |
| 2021 | 553W / 595L / 83D | 507W / 629L / 98D | 84.9 |
| 2020 | 1026W / 1204L / 117D | 893W / 1296L / 143D | 65.6 |
| 2019 | 283W / 262L / 33D | 262W / 274L / 31D | 79.1 |
| 2018 | 507W / 448L / 27D | 489W / 453L / 37D | 75.0 |
| 2017 | 311W / 301L / 9D | 278W / 345L / 14D | 68.8 |
| 2016 | 122W / 71L / 5D | 98W / 81L / 5D | 71.5 |
| 2015 | 19W / 16L / 2D | 24W / 14L / 0D | 73.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1037 | 410 | 618 | 9 | 39.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 344 | 137 | 175 | 32 | 39.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 251 | 96 | 136 | 19 | 38.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 178 | 86 | 78 | 14 | 48.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 154 | 76 | 65 | 13 | 49.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 144 | 63 | 66 | 15 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 139 | 65 | 68 | 6 | 46.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 138 | 68 | 62 | 8 | 49.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 137 | 64 | 62 | 11 | 46.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 129 | 54 | 64 | 11 | 41.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 343 | 151 | 183 | 9 | 44.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 261 | 122 | 135 | 4 | 46.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 210 | 89 | 115 | 6 | 42.4% |
| Modern | 206 | 101 | 101 | 4 | 49.0% |
| Czech Defense | 169 | 86 | 76 | 7 | 50.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 160 | 75 | 79 | 6 | 46.9% |
| French Defense | 154 | 82 | 69 | 3 | 53.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 148 | 64 | 81 | 3 | 43.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 142 | 72 | 69 | 1 | 50.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 132 | 64 | 63 | 5 | 48.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 17 | 1 |