Player Profile: Sanyukina
Sanyukina is a dedicated chess enthusiast who has explored multiple time controls over several years of competitive play. She has demonstrated her skill particularly in blitz, achieving a peak rating of around 2200 in 2025. Across bullet and rapid formats, she has also shown impressive performances, reaching peaks near 2000+ in bullet and surpassing 2100 in rapid. In daily (correspondence) chess, she continues to gain experience and aims to improve her record there.
Playing Record & Style
In blitz alone, she has played well over 2,000 games, splitting her results almost evenly between wins and losses—a testament to both her willingness to compete fiercely and her strong resilience at the board. Combining all time controls, she has achieved a longest winning streak of 13 consecutive victories. She prefers to take games into deeper stages, leading to endgame scenarios in over 64% of her matches.
Sanyukina’s capacity for comebacks is notable—she has an 82.6% fight-back rate after facing setbacks, and her “win rate after losing material” impressively hovers around 95%. While she remains competitive, early resignations constitute less than 6% of her games, suggesting she prefers to battle on and look for resourceful chances.
Opening & Opponent Insights
Sanyukina frequently plays classical chess openings in blitz and has accumulated valuable practical experience in various variants, acting as a well-rounded competitor. She has faced a wide range of opponents, often contending with the same rivals multiple times. In some matchups, she boasts a perfect or near-perfect record, reflecting her ability to adapt and learn from each encounter.
When & How She Plays Best
Statistical trends show that Sanyukina’s performance tends to shine in the afternoon hours, with especially strong results around 14:00 and 17:00. Mondays also yield slightly better win rates compared to other days of the week. Despite some fluctuations, her overall consistency remains a hallmark of her playing style, and she adapts readily to new challenges.
Conclusion
Sanyukina’s story is one of evolving talent, marked by impressive rating peaks, measured strategic play, and an unwavering drive to improve. Her journey showcases robust endgame skills, excellent resilience, and a desire to master every facet of the game—from fiercely fought blitz battles to longer, more methodical formats. She stands as a formidable opponent and a student of the game who strives for continued success on the chessboard.
Feedback Report for Sanan Aliyev (2122 (2015-01-11))
Quick Glance
• Current form: strong 55-60 % win rate in 3 + 2 live games.
• Typical openings: 1.d4 systems (Slav / Nimzo-Indian) when White, Sicilian & English set-ups as Black.
• Preferred style: dynamic piece activity – you often sacrifice structure for initiative.
• Key charts for reference:
Your Strengths
- Pressure in the middlegame. In your win vs
dagadu123you converted a space edge into a rolling passed d-pawn, finishing with 40.Qg8#. Your coordination of queen + minor pieces was excellent. - Piece activity over material. Even when down a pawn you often create powerful counter-play (e.g. …Rc8+c4 breaks in several Sicilian victories).
- Tactical alertness. You rarely miss basic forks & pins; the tactic 24.Rc7! in the Slav game showed good calculation depth.
- Increment usage. You stay calm in mutual time trouble and gain seconds with fast forcing moves.
Recurring Issues
- Premature pawn thrusts around your king.
• Loss vs paulbjork: …h5-h4 weakened g5/f5-squares & you never castled long enough to reorganise.
• Loss vsFamousBroccoli: …g5 and …h6 invited Nd5, Qg3 ideas and the pawn storm turned against you.
Tip: Before pushing wing pawns ask “Will this move improve my worst-placed piece?” If not, reconsider. - Overlooking opponent counter-play in symmetrical structures.
In the English (A34) game you allowed Nd5 & exd5 leaving weak dark squares. Study classic games by Karpov on the English to learn typical plans. - End-game technique.
AgainstFamousBroccoliyou reached a rook + pawn ending that was still defensible but resigned after inaccuracy 54…e4?. Work on 4-vs-3 same-side rook endings. - Piece coordination after material imbalances.
In the Nimzo (loss vs Kenpachi-Dmitar) 12…Rh6?!/…Rg6?! put rooks offside. Follow the rule “activate heavy pieces after stabilising the centre.”
Opening Priorities (next 2 weeks)
| Colour | Focus | Concrete Task |
|---|---|---|
| White | Slav Exchange & Nimzo Classical | Add one quiet line versus early …cxd4 to avoid repeating 4…Nf6 5…Nc6 setups. |
| Black | English Symmetrical | Prepare a solid plan vs 1.c4 g3/Bg2. Suggest learning the hedgehog move-order: …e6, …b6, …Bb7. |
Illustrative Moment
Study this miniature; replay it slowly and note how every move attacks or defends a key square.
Training Plan (next 4 weeks)
- Week 1: 30 min / day of end-game drills (rook + pawn & minor-piece vs pawns).
- Week 2: Build a model-game database for each main opening. Annotate one game nightly, focusing on plans not moves.
- Week 3: Tactics sprint – 50 puzzles; specifically positions with zwischenzug Zwischenzug and double-attack themes.
- Week 4: Play 10 training games without pawn pushes on your own side of the board before move 8 (forces piece development discipline). Review critically.
Mindset & Practical Tips
• Apply two-move blunder check: look at every capture and check your opponent can make in the next two moves.
• Incorporate Prophylaxis – ask “What is my opponent’s idea?” before deciding.
• Keep a journal of critical positions where you felt uncertain; revisit them weekly with an engine to quantify the evaluation shifts.
Next Review
After 75 additional rapid games (or in one month) export your PGN set and we’ll reassess progress, particularly king safety decisions.
Good luck in your upcoming games, Sanan! Stay curious and keep analysing.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| huseyn0iqnoobas | 15W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
| abu-ada5 | 5W / 4L / 3D | View Games |
| Eldar7005 | 9W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| nihad1199 | 8W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| patofacil | 5W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2018 | 2144 | 1602 | |
| 2024 | 1905 | 1487 | ||
| 2023 | 1848 | 1935 | 1729 | 713 |
| 2022 | 1295 | 1722 | 777 | |
| 2021 | 1588 | 1735 | 1843 | |
| 2020 | 1553 | 1691 | ||
| 2019 | 1562 | 1683 | ||
| 2017 | 1514 | 1573 | 1466 | |
| 2016 | 1642 | 1570 | ||
| 2015 | 1375 | 1717 | 1711 | |
| 2014 | 1705 | 1766 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 261W / 283L / 41D | 255W / 293L / 27D | 67.6 |
| 2024 | 33W / 52L / 4D | 36W / 49L / 6D | 66.3 |
| 2023 | 294W / 279L / 27D | 271W / 297L / 28D | 65.3 |
| 2022 | 25W / 20L / 1D | 30W / 39L / 1D | 37.6 |
| 2021 | 32W / 27L / 3D | 31W / 24L / 6D | 62.5 |
| 2020 | 18W / 20L / 2D | 22W / 19L / 0D | 63.9 |
| 2019 | 49W / 31L / 3D | 49W / 26L / 3D | 50.2 |
| 2017 | 13W / 3L / 0D | 12W / 4L / 0D | 47.8 |
| 2016 | 3W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 3L / 0D | 54.2 |
| 2015 | 32W / 20L / 1D | 25W / 26L / 0D | 67.1 |
| 2014 | 6W / 0L / 0D | 5W / 1L / 0D | 58.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 113 | 61 | 46 | 6 | 54.0% |
| Unknown | 109 | 57 | 51 | 1 | 52.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 101 | 44 | 50 | 7 | 43.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 80 | 45 | 32 | 3 | 56.2% |
| Australian Defense | 74 | 32 | 38 | 4 | 43.2% |
| Czech Defense | 74 | 33 | 40 | 1 | 44.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 69 | 32 | 35 | 2 | 46.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 69 | 30 | 35 | 4 | 43.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 66 | 33 | 28 | 5 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 63 | 33 | 28 | 2 | 52.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Australian Defense | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapport-Jobava System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Slav Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 2 |