Sai Nirupama Kotepalli - Woman FIDE Master & Chess Enthusiast
Meet Sai Nirupama Kotepalli, a chess player who’s not just about kings and queens, but also about conquering the 64 squares with style and determination. Awarded the prestigious title of Woman FIDE Master, Sai Nirupama has proven that patience, tactical brilliance, and maybe a little caffeine, can make all the difference in the game.
Starting from modest blitz ratings in 2014, Sai Nirupama’s journey is a rollercoaster of comebacks, long winning streaks, and countless hours of head-scratching over forks, pins, and unexpected sacrifices. With a blitz peak rating soaring over 2500, this player’s rapid and bullet performances are nothing short of impressive — they’ve got the speed and precision that make opponents wish they brought their owl friends for advice.
When it comes to tactics, Sai Nirupama is the master of comebacks: an astounding 81.76% comeback rate proves that giving up is not in their vocabulary. Lose a piece? No problem — a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece suggests this player thrives under pressure or perhaps simply loves dramatic finishes.
Not one to throw in the towel early, their early resignation rate is a modest 7.94%, showing patience that would put even the longest marathon film watcher to shame. And speaking of marathons — average games last nearly 68 moves, proving Sai Nirupama enjoys torturing their opponents in the endgame as much as checking their emails during time pressure.
Sai Nirupama’s style favors the white pieces slightly more with a 51.79% win rate, but opponents beware: their black pieces fight valiantly with a respectable 46.23% win rate. Their playing schedule might make you curious too — highest winning hours are around midday and late morning, so strategically scheduling a game at 12 PM could give you less of a fighting chance!
Off the board, Sai Nirupama is known for an unflappable approach — their tilt factor is moderate, suggesting they maintain a calm demeanor even when the queen goes missing unexpectedly. And online, they show just as much fight, racking up wins against a broad variety of opponents with some impressive streaks including a longest winning run hitting 29 games. Not bad for someone who presumably also sleeps and eats!
In summary: Sai Nirupama Kotepalli is a fierce, resilient, and witty chess warrior, whose games aren’t just battles but stories of tactical intrigue, quirky moments, and impressive skill. Challenge them online, and prepare for a match that’s more rollercoaster than slideshow.
Hi Sai Nirupama!
You have been playing energetic, resource-seeking chess and it clearly shows in your strong results and a current peak of 2525 (2025-05-08). Below is a concise performance snapshot:
What you’re already doing well
- Tactical alertness: Your 18…Ng4!! in the win against benyamin-1993 instantly revived a piece-down position and converted to a resignation. (See the critical phase in the PGN viewer.)
- Endgame patience: The queen + rook endgame versus shortcrustpiastri was converted with calm centralization and perpetual mating nets. Your coordination of queen + bishop vs. lone king in the final seconds is textbook.
- Flexible opening setups: As White you alternate between the Closed Sicilian structure (e4, Nf3, d3, g3) and the King’s Indian Attack versus …e5. This keeps opponents guessing while keeping theory light.
Targeted growth areas
- Handling dynamic imbalances as Black
Loss to Mahir Salkic (Slav Exchange) shows hesitation after 14…Ne4. You willingly entered a structure with an IQP & bishop pair for White without a concrete plan. Before committing to such structural concessions, ask: “What is my next forcing move?” If you can’t find one, consider a quieter option like …Qa5 or …Rc8 first. - King safety in the Pirc setups
In the game vs. Slow-Demon, the sequence 10.Qxb7 and 17.Rd6 exploited your loose dark squares. React faster to early queen sorties by meeting Qxb7 with …Qc8 (guarding b7 & h3) or simply delaying …c5 until castled. - Clock management
Your average time left at move 25 is ~25 s in wins but <15 s in losses. Try the “30-20-10” rule: aim to have ≥30 s on move 10, ≥20 s on move 20, ≥10 s entering the endgame. Even one extra second per move will cut the blunder rate drastically. - Scoring versus higher-rated players
Against 2600+ you often choose solid but slightly passive systems. Consider adding one ambitious line to surprise them, e.g. Open Sicilian with 3.d4 (you already showed good feel for the resulting structures as Black!).
Action plan for the next two weeks
- Replay the critical losses with the engine for 10 minutes each. Ask “Where was my first non-forcing decision?” Correcting one early inaccurate plan usually fixes the whole game.
- Daily exercise: 15 mixed tactics, theme defensive resources & zwischenzug. Track your score; aim for >80 % accuracy.
- Opening tune-up: prepare one new idea in the Sicilian as White (e.g. 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Ice-Cream Attack) and test it in five blitz games. Record the practical results.
- Time-control drill: play three 3|2 blitz games focusing solely on keeping ≥20 s after move 20. Ignore the result; train the habit.
Motivational nugget
“Improvement begins at the edge of your comfort zone. Push one boundary each session.”
Keep the energy high and the calculation clean—looking forward to your next rating jump!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| cherry2803 | 11W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| gacg | 4W / 3L / 1D | View Games |
| pKiLz5Rn9b | 2W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| juniortay | 0W / 6L / 1D | View Games |
| kevin9512 | 1W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2248 | 2525 | 1766 | |
| 2024 | 2405 | 2452 | 1744 | 1873 |
| 2023 | 2350 | 2354 | 1893 | |
| 2022 | 2362 | 2377 | 1637 | |
| 2021 | 2311 | 2445 | 1583 | 1958 |
| 2020 | 2332 | 2404 | 1576 | 1843 |
| 2019 | 2231 | 1662 | 1873 | |
| 2018 | 2262 | 1871 | ||
| 2017 | 2182 | 2272 | 1855 | 1796 |
| 2016 | 1792 | 1398 | ||
| 2015 | 1884 | 1192 | ||
| 2014 | 1775 | 2094 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11W / 9L / 0D | 11W / 9L / 1D | 74.4 |
| 2024 | 33W / 17L / 0D | 26W / 21L / 3D | 73.3 |
| 2023 | 42W / 37L / 4D | 41W / 35L / 3D | 68.6 |
| 2022 | 39W / 39L / 3D | 32W / 42L / 5D | 82.3 |
| 2021 | 70W / 38L / 13D | 57W / 59L / 6D | 80.0 |
| 2020 | 67W / 71L / 5D | 63W / 81L / 8D | 70.9 |
| 2019 | 36W / 42L / 6D | 34W / 40L / 12D | 71.5 |
| 2018 | 122W / 74L / 9D | 108W / 72L / 18D | 56.9 |
| 2017 | 52W / 42L / 6D | 48W / 43L / 7D | 73.9 |
| 2016 | 50W / 43L / 7D | 45W / 58L / 7D | 70.4 |
| 2015 | 5W / 4L / 1D | 5W / 7L / 0D | 68.3 |
| 2014 | 15W / 31L / 1D | 21W / 26L / 5D | 76.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 50 | 38 | 10 | 2 | 76.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 50 | 32 | 15 | 3 | 64.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 43 | 23 | 18 | 2 | 53.5% |
| Australian Defense | 35 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 34 | 21 | 8 | 5 | 61.8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 25 | 14 | 11 | 0 | 56.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 25 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 64.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 24 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 22 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 68.2% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 126 | 51 | 65 | 10 | 40.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 122 | 40 | 70 | 12 | 32.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 108 | 56 | 42 | 10 | 51.9% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 65 | 32 | 30 | 3 | 49.2% |
| Australian Defense | 63 | 31 | 29 | 3 | 49.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 51 | 19 | 28 | 4 | 37.2% |
| French Defense | 49 | 15 | 31 | 3 | 30.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 42 | 14 | 25 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 38 | 15 | 19 | 4 | 39.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 37 | 21 | 12 | 4 | 56.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| French Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 26 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 70.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 29 | 2 |
| Losing | 24 | 0 |