Overview
Andreas H. (sometimes seen online as Sardoche) is a lively, blitz-first chess player who treats the 3|0 clock like a playground — fast, a little chaotic, and often surprisingly effective. Over several years Andreas built a huge volume of games across Blitz, Rapid and Bullet, with blitz emerging as the preferred time control.
- Preferred time control: Blitz — the arena where Andreas is most active.
- Career high moments include a Rapid peak near the 2155 mark and a Blitz peak around 1849.
- Style: aggressive openings, long endgames and a knack for comebacks.
Playing style & tendencies
Andreas mixes creative opening choices with surprisingly long games — many decisive results go well past move 60. He is not afraid to play offbeat systems and often presses in endgames rather than cashing in early.
- Avg moves per decisive game: ~64 (wins and losses are both long affairs).
- Endgame frequency: high — about 65% of his games reach deep endings.
- Tactical resilience: Comeback rate ~78% — he fights until the last second.
- Early resignation rate: low (~1.6%), meaning he plays out most lost causes.
Favorite openings (highlights)
Andreas favors offbeat flank systems and dynamic Sicilian structures. Below are some openings he returns to again and again in blitz and rapid play.
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack — a core weapon in his repertoire (thousands of games played).
- Sicilian Defense and sub-branches (notably the Accelerated Dragon: Exchange Variation).
- Amar Gambit — surprisingly successful for rapid tactics.
- Benko/Benoni ideas and the Bird/Batavo Gambit for sharp imbalanced play.
- Often chooses openings that lead to unusual middlegames where practical chances abound.
Career highlights & streaks
Andreas's timeline is a mix of steady growth, long streaks and big volumes of games — the kind of record that makes him both familiar and unpredictable to regular opponents.
- Longest winning streak: 19 games.
- Longest losing streak: 14 games (it happens to the best of us).
- Peak Rapid rating: 2155 (a career high that shows his strength at longer fast time controls).
- Peak Blitz rating: 1849 — aligns with his identity as a blitz specialist.
Rivals & head-to-heads
Andreas has cultivated notable rivalries through volume play. A few frequently seen names:
- Nemo Zhou — most-played opponent (tough matchup historically).
- BatonRougeJr — a positive record in many encounters.
- maxstirner77, roroowtv — regular competitors in his pool of blitz games.
- Some standout records: dominating wins versus princessesabri and rikirixx.
Statistics snapshot
To translate volume into performance: Andreas has thousands of blitz games with a nearly even win/loss split and a small share of draws — typical for very active online blitz players who prefer decisive, tactical battles.
- Blitz: tens of thousands of games played across years with an overall near-50% adjusted win rate.
- Rapid & Bullet: strong showings in rapid (peak 2155) and solid tactical results in bullet as well.
- Strength-adjusted win rates: Blitz ~0.503, Rapid ~0.504, Bullet ~0.51 — consistent across formats.
Sample game & interactive elements
Explore a typical sharp Sicilian sequence Andreas might enjoy (clickable viewer placeholder):
- Trend chart (blitz rating snapshot):
- Quick stat badge: 2155 (2025-06-10)
Fun facts & closing
Andreas plays like someone who treats each blitz game as a short story: plenty of drama, a few plot twists, and often an ending that leaves both players wondering what just happened. Best time of day to catch him at his peak? The data teases a late-night/early-morning edge — so bring coffee, snacks, and a tactical alertness.
- Best time of day (data hint): early morning hours show a small edge.
- Signature trait: refuses to give up — comebacks are his specialty.
- Parting line: challenge him in blitz and expect a wild ride (and an entertaining postgame chat).
Hi Andreas H. — quick summary
Nice sharp play in your recent blitz win: you created a decisive kingside attack, coordinated rooks and queen well, and finished cleanly. Your losses show a recurring practical issue: time trouble and some tactical oversights when positions get sharp. Below are focused, actionable suggestions to keep the attacking strengths and fix the leaks.
What you did well (keep doing)
- Direct attacking instincts — you push pawns to open lines and follow up with pieces (the Rg2 → Rg5 → Rxh7 idea was efficient and thematic).
- Good piece coordination — rooks and queen worked together to exploit open files and weak back ranks.
- Willingness to simplify when it helps the attack — exchanging into lines that favour a mating net or decisive material gain.
- Opening choice suits your style — your use of the Nimzo-Larsen Attack gives you unbalanced middlegames with attacking chances.
Main areas to improve
- Time management — several losses ended when you ran low on clock. Blitz decisions must be faster in the opening and early middlegame to reserve time for tactics and endgames.
- Tactical accuracy under pressure — avoid hanging pieces or allowing forks and back-rank motifs around move 20–30 when the board gets chaotic.
- Opening follow-up plans — with your preferred openings, focus on the typical pawn breaks and piece targets so you know where to put pieces without long calculation on the clock.
- Defensive prophylaxis — in some losses you allowed opponent counterplay (knight jumps or pins). A quick "what is my opponent threatening?" check each move will cut these down.
Concrete drills (daily / weekly)
- Tactics: 10–15 minutes daily of mixed tactics with a focus on forks, pins and discovered attacks. Emphasize speed — set 5 minutes to solve as many as possible, then 10 minutes accuracy work.
- Opening mini-repertoire: make a 10–12 move cheat-sheet for your main lines (for example the typical plans in the Nimzo-Larsen Attack). Practice these for rapid familiarity — you should play them instinctively in the first 10 moves.
- Rapid conversion practice: play 5 games with 5+3 time control where you practice converting a material/positional advantage while keeping 30+ seconds on clock.
- Blitz clock drills: play sessions where you force yourself to spend < 10 seconds on the first 10 moves (preparation zone), and then allocate time for the middlegame. This trains fast, reasonable moves early.
Practical game tips (blitz)
- Move 1–10: choose familiar, safe moves. If you know the main plan, play fast — this saves time for the messy middlegame.
- When you get an attack: if you can simplify into a winning endgame or a direct mating net, trade pieces purposefully — don't keep unnecessary complications when you're ahead on time.
- Before every move ask: "What is my opponent threatening?" — that 2–3 second check prevents many tactical losses.
- Use the clock as a resource: if you’re low, avoid deep tactical puzzles unless they’re forced. Choose the practical, risk-averse line more often when flagging is a danger.
Short game notes — one win and one loss
Win: excellent kingside break and decisive finish. Replay the line to internalize the motif:
Loss (time trouble): the opening reached sharp middlegame positions quickly — you flagged with rough equality. Replay and note moments where you could have chosen a simpler, quicker move.
7-day improvement plan (compact)
- Day 1: 20 min tactics (speed), 1 rapid game (10+3), review opening moves you used.
- Day 2: 15 min opening drills (typical plans in Nimzo-Larsen Attack), 20 min endgame basics (king + pawn vs king), 1 blitz session with focus on time control.
- Day 3: 20 min tactics (accuracy), 2 blitz games with a rule: spend <10s on first 10 moves.
- Day 4: Analyze two losses — find where time drain started and write a 3-move plan for similar positions.
- Day 5: Play 4 rapid (5+3) games and practice converting + keep 30s buffer at move 25.
- Day 6: Tactics marathon 30min + play one training game and aim to win within time with practical moves.
- Day 7: Restless review — pick a typical middle-game structure from your opening and prepare a 5-move forced plan to save time in actual games.
Quick checklist before each blitz game
- Do I know the first 8 moves of my chosen line? If yes, play them fast.
- Is my king safe? If not, consider exchanging pieces or castling quickly.
- Any immediate tactics for either side? Spend 5–10s scanning for forks/pins.
- If significantly low on time: trade into simpler positions or aim for perpetual/drawish resources instead of long calculation.
Closing — focus for next week
Prioritize time management and fast pattern recognition (tactics + typical plans in your openings). You already have a strong attacking toolkit — with a couple of simple clock habits and focused tactics work you’ll convert more wins and stop the flag losses.
Want a 2-week personalized plan based on your most-played lines (I can generate a move-by-move cheat sheet and common tactic list for your top openings)?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Nemo Zhou | 7W / 33L / 9D | View Games |
| BatonRougeJr | 16W / 11L / 0D | View Games |
| maxstirner77 | 4W / 12L / 1D | View Games |
| princessesabri | 14W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| roroowtv | 15W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1592 | 1789 | 1949 | |
| 2024 | 1318 | 1535 | 1970 | |
| 2023 | 1362 | 1595 | 1748 | |
| 2022 | 1456 | 1607 | 1810 | 253 |
| 2021 | 1307 | 1432 | 1718 | |
| 2020 | 1014 | 933 | 1108 | |
| 2016 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1088W / 1064L / 87D | 1004W / 1108L / 106D | 71.9 |
| 2024 | 307W / 265L / 21D | 267W / 292L / 34D | 70.5 |
| 2023 | 765W / 779L / 56D | 764W / 778L / 59D | 66.6 |
| 2022 | 1564W / 1626L / 111D | 1621W / 1554L / 120D | 64.2 |
| 2021 | 2725W / 2484L / 164D | 2628W / 2558L / 201D | 63.1 |
| 2020 | 82W / 61L / 4D | 66W / 75L / 4D | 54.8 |
| 2016 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 49.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2283 | 1128 | 1085 | 70 | 49.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 675 | 330 | 320 | 25 | 48.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 664 | 317 | 324 | 23 | 47.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 654 | 351 | 273 | 30 | 53.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 651 | 289 | 335 | 27 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 545 | 266 | 266 | 13 | 48.8% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 522 | 268 | 242 | 12 | 51.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 471 | 236 | 222 | 13 | 50.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 375 | 175 | 183 | 17 | 46.7% |
| Benko Gambit | 346 | 183 | 151 | 12 | 52.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 976 | 493 | 437 | 46 | 50.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 830 | 395 | 401 | 34 | 47.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 719 | 366 | 333 | 20 | 50.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 609 | 303 | 272 | 34 | 49.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 452 | 198 | 226 | 28 | 43.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 393 | 204 | 178 | 11 | 51.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 363 | 202 | 152 | 9 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 329 | 132 | 169 | 28 | 40.1% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 318 | 145 | 168 | 5 | 45.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 305 | 155 | 137 | 13 | 50.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 249 | 129 | 117 | 3 | 51.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 242 | 122 | 115 | 5 | 50.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 131 | 68 | 59 | 4 | 51.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 97 | 52 | 41 | 4 | 53.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 89 | 42 | 46 | 1 | 47.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 76 | 41 | 35 | 0 | 54.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 73 | 33 | 39 | 1 | 45.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 64 | 27 | 35 | 2 | 42.2% |
| Benoni Defense | 59 | 35 | 22 | 2 | 59.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 54 | 24 | 28 | 2 | 44.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 7 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |