Selatin — Blitz Whisperer
Selatin is a chess player who thrives on the fast pace of blitz battles, where every second counts and every capture echoes. His wit keeps pace with his clock, and his games often feel like a short, sharp story told in checks and forks.
Preferred time control: Blitz. When the timer starts, Selatin dives into sharp positions with a calm focus and a grin that says, “I’ve got this… maybe.”
Playing Style and Character
Endgame frequency of 57.62% shows Selatin routinely converts tricky middlegames into clean conversions. His comeback rate of 83.85 highlights a tenacious spirit—no lead is safe when Selatin has a tactical idea brewing. Tilt factor sits at 25, a reminder that competitive fire fuels his play, and his most productive hours tend to be around 02:00, when the internet quiets and the board hums with clarity.
Opening Repertoire (Blitz)
Selatin favors dynamic, double-edged openings in blitz. The Scotch Game leads the charge, boasting strong results across hundreds of games. Other frequent choices include the French Defense and the Sicilian Defense, each offering rich, aggressive chances when the clock is pressing.
- Scotch Game — 619 games, 363 wins, 249 losses, 7 draws (WinRate 58.64%)
- French Defense — 296 games, 142 wins, 142 losses, 12 draws (WinRate 47.97%)
- Sicilian Defense — 248 games, 112 wins, 123 losses, 13 draws (WinRate 45.16%)
- Australian Defense — 195 games, 98 wins, 92 losses, 5 draws (WinRate 50.26%)
Profile Snapshot
Selatin carries a record of perseverance: a longest winning streak of 20 games and a longest losing streak of 25. These swings are part of the blitz story, where every game teaches something new. For a quick look at his profile, you can explore Selatin.
Quick Glance
A compact glimpse at his rating journey is available through a placeholder chart:
. For a sample game sequence, here is a PGN snippet you can inspect: .
Overview of your recent blitz play
You’ve shown a willingness to take tactical chances and press for active play in blitz. In your recent win you demonstrated strong initiative and the ability to convert concrete threats into a quick victory. However, you’ve also had losses where aggressive lines or opening deviations left you with difficult positions, and a few long games where timing and defensive accuracy mattered. Your openings indicate comfort with sharp, tactical structures, but there’s room to improve practical decision-making under time pressure and to shore up some typical blitz pitfalls.
What you do well
- Sharp, tactical intuition: you often seek forcing lines and look for concrete weaknesses in your opponent’s setup.
- Determined piece activity: you actively develop pieces with drive and are not afraid to sacrifice or create complications when the position allows it.
- Opening readiness in dynamic lines: you handle lively openings (like Scotch-related structures) with confidence and turn the midgame into tactical combat where you can press your initiative.
Key patterns to address in blitz
- Defensive exposure in aggressive lines: some losses show how quickly an attack can become dangerous if you overextend. Build a simple, reliable plan for king safety and predictable development even when the opponent sifts through tactical ideas.
- Endgame conversion under time pressure: practice converting small advantages into wins and recognizing when to simplify to a favorable endgame rather than chasing complications.
- Time management: keep a steady pace, especially in the early middlegame. Avoid deep, multi-branch calculations when you’re low on time; instead, focus on a clear plan and quick candidate moves.
Areas to improve
- Defensive resourcefulness in sharp positions: work on recognizing typical attacking motifs and reliable defensive ideas, such as reinforcing back rank protection and maintaining a solid pawn structure when under pressure.
- Opening discipline in blitz: while aggressive openings suit your style, prepare safe, solid replies to avoid early material losses or tactical traps that your opponent may set on the first few moves.
- Pattern recognition and calculation efficiency: train to spot a few key tactical motifs (forks, pins, overloaded pieces) and prune branches quickly to avoid time trouble.
Training plan and micro-goals
- Daily tactic practice: 15–20 minutes of bite-sized puzzles focusing on forks, pins, and overloading ideas. Aim for at least 20 correct solutions in a session to build automatic recognition.
- Blitz-specific endgame drills: 2–3 sessions per week, 10–15 minutes each, practicing king and pawn endings, opposition, and simple rook endings to improve conversion under clock pressure.
- Opening refinement: choose a compact, reliable line in your preferred opening family (for example, the Scotch family) and study 1–2 standard middlegame plans for that line. Practice these ideas in rapid games to reinforce familiarity. See: [[Link|opening|Scotch Game]]
- Post-game reflection: after each blitz session, write down 3 concrete takeaways (one tactical, one strategic, one time-management note) and attempt to implement them in the next games.
- Time-management discipline: implement a simple time budget per game (e.g., aim to keep roughly equal time on both sides through the first 15 moves) to reduce time pressure and avoid haste decisions.
Opening focus with practical notes
Your data shows strong results from the Scotch Game family when played well, suggesting a good fit for your style in blitz. Consider building a concise set of responses to common defenses and focusing on a consistent middlegame plan that keeps your king safe while maintaining active piece play. This can reduce risk while preserving your aggressive tone. For quick reference, you may explore the Scotch Game concepts here: Scotch Game
Next steps
- Commit to a 20–30 minute daily blitz training block, combining tactics, endgames, and one opening study streak.
- Review 2–3 recent games (including the losses) to extract 3 actionable lessons per game and implement them in your next session.
- Track your progress with a simple log: note the opening, the critical moment, and the improvement target for the next game.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| bigblee | 1W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| krocke | 1W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| masdarji | 0W / 2L / 1D | View Games |
| n3ovisi0n | 0W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| splitsanddoubles | 1W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 679 | 825 | 1225 | 1038 |
| 2024 | 1058 | 806 | 1210 | 1006 |
| 2023 | 1010 | 753 | 1133 | 1101 |
| 2022 | 1012 | 864 | 1134 | 1078 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 434W / 391L / 14D | 371W / 430L / 33D | 57.3 |
| 2024 | 570W / 509L / 17D | 491W / 572L / 30D | 55.1 |
| 2023 | 407W / 372L / 25D | 365W / 409L / 32D | 58.4 |
| 2022 | 326W / 289L / 13D | 299W / 317L / 15D | 53.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 645 | 378 | 260 | 7 | 58.6% |
| French Defense | 300 | 145 | 143 | 12 | 48.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 274 | 127 | 143 | 4 | 46.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 258 | 117 | 137 | 4 | 45.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 253 | 115 | 125 | 13 | 45.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 196 | 93 | 99 | 4 | 47.5% |
| Australian Defense | 196 | 98 | 93 | 5 | 50.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 170 | 85 | 83 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 149 | 73 | 72 | 4 | 49.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 146 | 73 | 67 | 6 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 91.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 16 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 43.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 15 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 86.7% |
| Australian Defense | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 10 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| French Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 98 | 51 | 44 | 3 | 52.0% |
| Scotch Game | 37 | 19 | 17 | 1 | 51.4% |
| Australian Defense | 36 | 15 | 20 | 1 | 41.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 35 | 12 | 22 | 1 | 34.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 29 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 48.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 29 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 62.1% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 29 | 14 | 13 | 2 | 48.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 28 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 35.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 27 | 10 | 17 | 0 | 37.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 25 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 72.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 10 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Scotch Game | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 1 |
| Losing | 25 | 0 |