Sam Shankland: A Chess Maestro
Sam Shankland, a renowned Grandmaster, has made significant strides in the world of chess, with a storied career characterized by impressive victories and thrilling performances across various formats. Known for his exceptional tactical awareness and strategic prowess, Shankland's journey in chess is nothing short of inspiring.
Shankland's chess career is highlighted by his strong win rates across different game formats. His Blitz performance, showcasing 2404 wins out of 4493 games, is particularly remarkable, illustrating his adaptability and quick thinking during rapid games. Shankland's Bullet performance further cements his reputation as a formidable player, boasting an impressive win rate of 73.44% from 418 games.
In the realm of Rapid chess, Shankland has demonstrated consistent proficiency, achieving a 52% win rate, reflecting his deep understanding of chess nuances. His Daily games also reflect his tenacity, securing 37 wins out of 59 matches.
Shankland's expertise is further exemplified in his tactical approach; his ability to maintain composure and seize opportunities even after losing a piece contributes to his high comeback rate of 92.57%. This resilience has earned him admiration and respect from peers and fans alike.
Throughout his career, Shankland has faced and often triumphed over formidable opponents, including the likes of Hikaru Nakamura and Daniel Naroditsky. His strategic mind is on full display, with an exceptional win rate when playing as White at 57.93% and as Black at 52.48%.
Despite an average tilt factor of 7, Shankland remains a force to be reckoned with, often executing thrilling games that extend beyond the conventional number of moves. His strategic patience in endgames, featuring prominently in 84.81% of his games, showcases his comprehensive understanding of chess strategy.
Sam Shankland's contribution to chess extends beyond his personal achievements. Through his games, he continues to inspire upcoming talents and enrich the global chess community with his analytical style and unyielding dedication to the sport. As Shankland continues to compete at the highest levels, his presence in the chess world underscores the profound blend of skill, intellect, and passion that defines chess mastery.
Feedback for Sam Shankland
Sam, your recent games show strong grasp of opening theory and solid middlegame strategies, especially in Queen's Gambit Declined and related lines. Your ability to transition from the opening to an active initiative is commendable, and you often capitalize well on minor inaccuracies by opponents.
Strengths
- Opening Preparation: You consistently choose reliable openings like the Queen's Gambit Declined and demonstrate good understanding of thematic plans such as pressure on the center and timely breaks (e.g. e4 and c4 advances).
- Positional Play: Your piece coordination and control of key squares are notable. Moves like 15.Ne5 and 23.exf7+ show your willingness to initiate dynamic complications when advantageous.
- Endgame Technique: You demonstrate good technique in complex rook and minor piece endgames, converting slight advantages meticulously.
- Time Management: You generally maintain a consistent pace during games, reducing the chance of blunders in time pressure.
Areas for Improvement
- Handling Pressure from Strong Opponents: Against higher-rated players, sometimes small inaccuracies or strategic misjudgments have led to losing critical material or deteriorating positions. For example, in your recent losses, be mindful of tactics around piece coordination and king safety, especially in the middlegame.
- Defensive Accuracy: There were a few instances where defensive resources could be explored deeper to prolong the game or prevent opponent breakthroughs (e.g., avoid rushed exchanges that weaken your position).
- Opening Variety: Though consistency in openings is good, incorporating a few surprise weapon lines could unsettle opponents who have prepared against your main repertoires.
Specific Suggestions
- Review critical moments in your losses, focusing on tactical alertness and king safety โ ensuring that checks, pins, and forks are always accounted for.
- Work on prophylactic thinking to prevent opponent plans before they develop fully, particularly against active counters in the center and on the wings.
- Experiment with minor opening deviations occasionally to maintain unpredictability.
- Strengthen your calculation skills by practicing puzzles focusing on dynamic imbalances โ this can help in complex middlegame positions like the ones you encounter.
Here is a recent game example showing your handling of a Queenโs Gambit Declined structure with strategic pressure and tactical awareness that led to a win:
Review this game against resha1988
Keep up the strong play and continue to fine-tune your defensive precision and flexibility in the opening. You're performing at a very high level with 3096 (2025-01-17) close to 3000, which is impressive!
๐ Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Naroditsky | 67W / 107L / 32D | |
| Alexander Rustemov | 98W / 66L / 36D | |
| Dmitrij Kollars | 38W / 34L / 11D | |
| x-3704738925 | 63W / 4L / 9D | |
| Rudik Makarian | 26W / 28L / 13D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2984 | |||
| 2024 | 3035 | 2546 | ||
| 2023 | 2987 | 2561 | ||
| 2022 | 2868 | |||
| 2021 | 2946 | 2744 | ||
| 2020 | 2882 | 2744 | ||
| 2019 | 2536 | 2878 | 2776 | |
| 2018 | 2403 | |||
| 2017 | 2363 | 2679 | ||
| 2016 | 2363 | |||
| 2015 | 2572 | 2520 | ||
| 2014 | 2200 | 2440 | 1937 | |
| 2013 | 2187 | 2479 | 1937 | |
| 2012 | 2354 | 2425 | 1937 | 1909 |
| 2011 | 2537 | 2510 | ||
| 2010 | 1978 | 1695 | 1200 | 2034 |
| 2009 | 2031 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 172W / 108L / 40D | 160W / 110L / 48D | 86.9 |
| 2024 | 721W / 392L / 165D | 626W / 432L / 215D | 86.5 |
| 2023 | 36W / 17L / 10D | 35W / 21L / 10D | 82.1 |
| 2022 | 43W / 21L / 13D | 33W / 29L / 10D | 82.1 |
| 2021 | 33W / 30L / 9D | 43W / 21L / 11D | 78.3 |
| 2020 | 102W / 64L / 30D | 88W / 67L / 29D | 82.6 |
| 2019 | 72W / 49L / 40D | 76W / 53L / 41D | 80.3 |
| 2018 | 5W / 0L / 3D | 3W / 0L / 3D | 80.3 |
| 2017 | 1W / 1L / 2D | 3W / 0L / 2D | 81.3 |
| 2016 | 1W / 4L / 0D | 3W / 1L / 0D | 83.7 |
| 2015 | 6W / 10L / 4D | 4W / 9L / 3D | 81.4 |
| 2014 | 35W / 9L / 0D | 29W / 8L / 5D | 72.6 |
| 2013 | 83W / 9L / 6D | 74W / 21L / 7D | 70.6 |
| 2012 | 202W / 49L / 27D | 194W / 66L / 19D | 73.9 |
| 2011 | 14W / 2L / 0D | 13W / 2L / 0D | 72.6 |
| 2010 | 10W / 5L / 2D | 8W / 4L / 3D | 61.6 |
| 2009 | 14W / 1L / 2D | 10W / 4L / 1D | 54.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 212 | 106 | 67 | 39 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 115 | 69 | 30 | 16 | 60.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 107 | 68 | 27 | 12 | 63.5% |
| Slav Defense | 106 | 62 | 29 | 15 | 58.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 102 | 61 | 32 | 9 | 59.8% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 101 | 51 | 35 | 15 | 50.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 88 | 58 | 22 | 8 | 65.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 87 | 53 | 20 | 14 | 60.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 85 | 39 | 34 | 12 | 45.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 78 | 40 | 28 | 10 | 51.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 33.3% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Berlin Wall | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 33 | 26 | 7 | 0 | 78.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 19 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 47.4% |
| Australian Defense | 19 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 84.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 92.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 83.3% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 11 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 81.8% |
| French Defense | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Czech Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Colle: 3...Bf5, Alekhine Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
๐ฅ Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 0 |
| Losing | 7 | 0 |