Sidhant Mohapatra (aka Sid_98)
International Master - FIDE
Sidhant Mohapatra, known in the chess circuits as Sid_98, is an International Master who blends fierce tactical awareness with a touch of unpredictability. With a penchant for comebacks—boasting a near 49% comeback rate—Sid_98 proves that giving up early is not in their playbook, even if early resignations sneak in almost half the time (hey, every chess warrior has quirks).
A versatile player, Sidhant excels across all major time controls. In blitz, where reflexes and rapid calculation reign supreme, Sid_98 has reached dazzling peak ratings above 2700, and against the clock's tyranny, they maintain a solid 53.8% win rate. Bullet games? Faster than the eye can follow, and Sidhant still holds a respectable win rate near 45%, with streaks that would intimidate even the most hardened opponents. Rapid chess seems to be the crown jewel, winning over 72% of their battles in this format, proving that patience combined with speed is a deadly combo.
Known for a somewhat roller-coaster rating journey, their performance graph resembles a thrilling chess thriller—highs abound, occasional dips too, but always bouncing back stronger. Sidhant’s longest winning streak is an impressive 19 games; if chess were a soap opera, this would be the must-see cliffhanger!
Off the board, Sid_98 favors evening play, with peak performance hours during the magic 16-18h window (where endgames turn into poetic finales), and Saturdays bring out their best winning magic. Opponents beware: from “kakarot_001” to “devikbronstein,” Sid_98’s win rates reveal an arsenal of well-prepared strategies and some fierce rivalry stat lines. There's even an endearing mystery about their "Top Secret" opening repertoire—with over 900 blitz games logged under this enigmatic label—keeping adversaries perpetually guessing.
Sidhant’s style? They win a tad more when playing white (52.3% win rate) but definitely hold their own with black (47.7% wins). Games tend to be moderately lengthy—an average of 43 moves per win and 42 for losses—suggesting that Sid_98 enjoys a thoughtful battle rather than quick knockouts (though sudden surprises do occur).
When not dismantling foes with calculated precision, Sid_98 may be found analyzing their next opponent or recovering gracefully from tilt—a rare visitor in their psychological profile at just 12%.
In the grand theater of chess, Sid_98’s performances are a mix of thrilling comebacks, tactical mastery, and a dash of humor—because what's a game without the occasional unexpected blunder or cheeky strategy? Keep an eye on this International Master; they are a rising star with tales yet to be told on the 64 squares.
Hi Sidhant! 👋
Snapshot of your current blitz form
- Personal best: 2762 (2025-02-11) – an elite level already.
- When you win most often:
- Your “good” and “tough” days:
What you’re already doing exceptionally well
- Flexible opening menu. 1 Nf3 & Bf4/Reti structures keep opponents guessing. Your Catalan win against Alex King shows you know how to steer positions into middlegames you understand.
- Sharp tactical vision. The 19…g5–g4 thrust vs. Akeem Brown demonstrates precise calculation of forcing lines and confidence in pawn storms.
- Practical defending. In several worse positions you found resourceful counter-shots (…Nd5 ideas, repeated zwischenzugs) that either equalised or turned the tables.
Opportunities to score even more points
- Time-management. Five of your last ten decisive games (both wins & losses) were settled by the clock. You often reach ‟critical mass” positions with <10 s, leaving no room to convert technical wins (e.g. vs. ykam78 and Zurability).
Quick fix: Decide on a move in 15 s, spend the extra 10 s only if the position is sharp. Train with 1 | 1 games to force instant pattern recognition. - Conversion technique in simplified endings. Lost endgames against wild3000 and eljanov were objectively drawable earlier. You missed chances to activate the king and trade into won pawn endings.
Training menu (30 min / week):
– 25 rook+pawn studies (Silman’s “100 Endgames” §§82-106).
– Play ‟rook & knight vs. rook” against a table-base bot until you hold 10/10. - Handling early …d4 strikes in the Reti. In the ykam78 game the 3…d4 4…c5 structure gave Black the initiative. Study:
– 4.e3 dxe3 5.fxe3 !? (top engine line).
– 4.b4 (Morozevich gambit style) to catch opponents off-guard. - Strategic clarity vs. the London set-ups. In your loss to eljanov you entered an IQP position but then drifted. Two models to copy:
– Carlsen–So, Wijk 2023 (…d5-d4 break).
– Giri–Aronian, Stavanger 2022 (early …g6 and …Nh5-f4).
Four-week improvement plan
| Focus | Tool / Drill | Weekly Time |
|---|---|---|
| Clock discipline | Play 10 bullet games, review only moves made <1 s | 30 min |
| Endgame technique | Lichess table-base trainer, rook+minor piece vs pawns | 60 min |
| Opening patch | Analyse 3…d4 Reti lines with engine, build a mini-file | 45 min |
| Tactics (defensive) | Custom puzzle set: “Find only the *non-obvious* save” | 15 min daily |
Motivational checkpoint
Your attacking win vs. AlexanderKing is still fresh:
Lock-in the feeling from that game, and apply the tweaks above – breaking 2800 blitz is well within reach!
Good luck, and keep enjoying the grind!
– Your Chess Coach 🤝
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Harikrishnan A Ra | 42W / 67L / 1D | View Games |
| Karthik Venkataraman | 40W / 27L / 2D | View Games |
| baivabmishra | 45W / 7L / 1D | View Games |
| Aravindh Chithambaram | 15W / 28L / 2D | View Games |
| Sai Agni Jeevitesh J | 20W / 21L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2650 | 2730 | 2364 | |
| 2024 | 1932 | |||
| 2022 | 1897 | 2364 | ||
| 2021 | 2634 | 2725 | 2389 | |
| 2020 | 1881 | 1881 | 2360 | 1947 |
| 2019 | 2397 | 1724 | 2363 | 1818 |
| 2018 | 2416 | 2561 | ||
| 2017 | 2302 | 2565 | 1800 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25W / 8L / 3D | 29W / 6L / 7D | 80.6 |
| 2024 | 35W / 21L / 0D | 24W / 17L / 0D | 0.0 |
| 2022 | 2W / 2L / 0D | 2W / 1L / 0D | 82.0 |
| 2021 | 49W / 44L / 3D | 51W / 34L / 2D | 16.4 |
| 2020 | 173W / 136L / 12D | 173W / 167L / 9D | 13.6 |
| 2019 | 124W / 107L / 13D | 105W / 132L / 13D | 78.2 |
| 2018 | 6W / 10L / 2D | 11W / 5L / 0D | 92.8 |
| 2017 | 101W / 94L / 7D | 84W / 110L / 8D | 69.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petrov's Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 763 | 406 | 349 | 8 | 53.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 15 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 53.3% |
| Modern | 13 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 53.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 48 | 73 | 0 | 39.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 46 | 21 | 22 | 3 | 45.6% |
| Modern | 31 | 14 | 14 | 3 | 45.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 21 | 9 | 12 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 20 | 7 | 12 | 1 | 35.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 19 | 8 | 10 | 1 | 42.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 19 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 73.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 19 | 5 | 12 | 2 | 26.3% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 17 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 52.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 17 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 35.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 6 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |