Muhammad Lutfi Ali - International Master Extraordinaire
Muhammad Lutfi Ali, affectionately known online as Sippp, is no chess amateur. This International Master, certified by FIDE, has dazzled the chess community with a relentless blitzkrieg of games and an uncanny ability to bounce back from even the darkest of positions—boasting a remarkable 91.33% comeback rate. When life takes a piece, Muhammad takes the board!
Starting with modest blitz ratings around 1300 in 2010, Muhammad rapidly ascended the ranks, smashing records and opponents alike. Peaking beyond 2900 in bullet chess—a realm where reflexes and rapid calculations are king—this maestro has shown a win rate soaring above 54% in bullet and over 52% in blitz, crafting victories with surgical precision and a sprinkle of secret opening tactics that leave rivals befuddled.
Famous for playing lengthy battles (an average of ~79 moves per win and 85 moves per loss), this player prefers the scenic route over quick finishes, proving that patience and endurance in chess are truly virtues. Despite an intimidating rating, Muhammad's psychological resilience is legendary, maintaining a tilt factor of just 12 in the chaotic battlefield of online chess. Not to mention an average daily win rate hovering just above 50%, because who said grinding couldn't be glamorous?
Whether it’s the crack of dawn or the dead of night (with a spike in win rates at odd hours like 5 AM and 6 AM), Muhammad is ready to deliver moves that dazzle and confound. This adaptability also shows in a balanced performance with White and Black pieces, wielding each side with a near-equal winning hand.
Off the 64 squares, Muhammad’s greatest rival might just be the caffeine supply—or perhaps the chess clock, which has often been merciless against those who blink first. Yet, with a longest winning streak pegged at 17 games, this is a player who once locked opponents in a relentless victory chain worthy of chess folklore.
In summary, Muhammad Lutfi Ali doesn’t just play chess—they turn it into an art form, a battlefield, and occasionally, a hilarious puzzle for their opponents. Keep an eye on this IM, as the “Top Secret” openings and lightning-fast tactics continue to shape the online chess battlefield.
Hi Muhammad Lutfi Ali, here’s your personalised chess-improvement report
1. Quick snapshot
Your current best blitz peak: 2912 (2023-12-27). Recent form: 5 wins – 5 losses (last 10 games). Activity charts:
2. What you are already doing well
- Courageous central breaks. Moves like 20.e5 (vs TheeShelbyy) and 17.e5 (vs Danila Bilan) show you are not afraid to seize the initiative.
- Tactical alertness. The combination 26.Qxc7+–27.Re7+ in your win with White exploited a pin and forced material gain.
- Piece activity from the opening. In several Philidor/Sicilian games you quickly developed bishops to g5/bc4, creating early pressure.
3. Priority fixes
-
King safety vs counter-sacrifices.
In the loss to Danila Bilan you allowed 21.Nf6+! because the diagonal a1–h8 was loose and …f5 weakened the dark squares. Guideline: before pawn thrusts like …f5/…h5 ask, “What squares become weak and can my opponent sac there?” -
Converting extra material.
You were up two pawns against ClassyEl but let the position drift and the game was abandoned worse. Create a habit checklist in winning positions:- Centralise king after queens are traded.
- Trade pieces, not pawns, when ahead.
- Avoid unnecessary pawn moves near own king.
-
Time management.
Most critical blunders came with <25 seconds. Try the “15-10-5” rule: aim to have ≥1:45 after move 15, ≥1:10 after move 25, ≥0:30 entering any tactical sequence. If you drop below, simplify.
4. Opening recommendations
| Your side | Frequent line | Suggested tweak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Hyper-accelerated Dragon | Study the Maroczy plans after 5.c4. Model game: Caruana–Carlsen, London 2019. |
| Black | King’s Indian setups vs Torre | Replace …Na5 with …Nbd7 & …e5; keeps queenside intact. |
| White | Philidor Exchange | Add 12.a4 lines to fight …b5 early. |
5. Illustrative snapshot
The critical blunder in your last loss – spot why 36…Rg8? loses on the spot:
6. Middlegame themes to study next
- Dark-square strategy in the King’s Indian & Pirc structures.
- Switching from attack to prophylaxis prophylaxis once you’ve won material.
- Identifying and executing a zwischenzug zwischenzug to refute tactics like Nf6+ above.
7. Action plan for the coming week
- Review each loss, pausing at the first big evaluation swing; ask “What simple move kept control?”
- Play five 10 + 5 games focusing solely on not pushing the f-pawn unless your king is 100 % safe.
- Finish the Chess.com Drill “Defending against Greek Gift” (15 positions).
Stay consistent, and those 2700-level opponents will soon feel the pressure. Good luck!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| masruri_rahman | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Bibek Thing | 4W / 0L / 0D | |
| Drasko Boskovic | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| Vignesh N.R | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Kent Slate | 2W / 4L / 0D | |
| gelarsagaradwitama | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| prayogisaputra13 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| ziyad907 | 5W / 0L / 0D | |
| kondor4860 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Susanto Megaranto | 36W / 84L / 11D | |
| stellarchess | 75W / 46L / 6D | |
| aakash-dalvi7 | 55W / 47L / 5D | |
| Pranav Anand | 22W / 46L / 3D | |
| Νik kontos | 41W / 22L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2808 | 2863 | 2348 | |
| 2024 | 2804 | 2791 | 2348 | |
| 2023 | 2676 | 2833 | ||
| 2022 | 2718 | 2753 | 2345 | |
| 2021 | 2612 | 2746 | 2310 | |
| 2020 | 2652 | 2668 | 2238 | |
| 2019 | 2705 | 2778 | ||
| 2018 | 2658 | 2571 | ||
| 2017 | 2508 | 2480 | ||
| 2016 | 2569 | 2433 | 1918 | |
| 2015 | 2370 | 2315 | 1601 | |
| 2012 | 2521 | 1956 | ||
| 2011 | 2651 | 1930 | 1440 | |
| 2010 | 2574 | 1223 | 1595 | |
| 2009 | 1610 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 330W / 223L / 31D | 299W / 230L / 47D | 84.1 |
| 2024 | 1079W / 706L / 125D | 1005W / 757L / 142D | 86.1 |
| 2023 | 521W / 312L / 56D | 464W / 346L / 81D | 86.3 |
| 2022 | 99W / 44L / 9D | 87W / 59L / 10D | 81.7 |
| 2021 | 320W / 224L / 26D | 286W / 227L / 37D | 80.5 |
| 2020 | 56W / 37L / 20D | 56W / 43L / 16D | 90.8 |
| 2019 | 105W / 68L / 17D | 118W / 62L / 17D | 86.9 |
| 2018 | 94W / 54L / 13D | 92W / 64L / 15D | 85.2 |
| 2017 | 76W / 78L / 5D | 79W / 65L / 12D | 88.4 |
| 2016 | 437W / 351L / 38D | 394W / 376L / 46D | 82.2 |
| 2015 | 130W / 111L / 7D | 120W / 119L / 12D | 79.4 |
| 2012 | 6W / 2L / 1D | 5W / 5L / 0D | 82.2 |
| 2011 | 23W / 21L / 1D | 32W / 19L / 1D | 56.2 |
| 2010 | 49W / 35L / 0D | 49W / 37L / 1D | 64.6 |
| 2009 | 9W / 5L / 0D | 8W / 4L / 1D | 35.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 847 | 476 | 331 | 40 | 56.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 531 | 292 | 213 | 26 | 55.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 451 | 259 | 172 | 20 | 57.4% |
| East Indian Defense | 277 | 138 | 118 | 21 | 49.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 230 | 123 | 92 | 15 | 53.5% |
| Döry Defense | 227 | 120 | 89 | 18 | 52.9% |
| Czech Defense | 194 | 117 | 69 | 8 | 60.3% |
| Australian Defense | 191 | 110 | 73 | 8 | 57.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 179 | 102 | 65 | 12 | 57.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 169 | 98 | 61 | 10 | 58.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 366 | 194 | 147 | 25 | 53.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 112 | 70 | 36 | 6 | 62.5% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 91 | 39 | 43 | 9 | 42.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 87 | 43 | 34 | 10 | 49.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 84 | 40 | 28 | 16 | 47.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 81 | 45 | 29 | 7 | 55.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 75 | 45 | 25 | 5 | 60.0% |
| Czech Defense | 72 | 42 | 25 | 5 | 58.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 68 | 35 | 31 | 2 | 51.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 63 | 35 | 23 | 5 | 55.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Modern Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed, Kecskemet Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Döry Defense | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |