Sky-net: A Brief Chess Biography
Sky-net is a titled chess player who holds the prestigious Candidate Master title from FIDE. A Blitz enthusiast with a lightning-fast clock hand, Sky-net treats the board like a playground where every move might be a cheeky grin and a daring plan. When Sky-net sits down for a game, the pieces seem to lean in, eager for the next surprise.
Rise to the Title
Beginning in the mid-2010s as a steady climber from the 1200s, Sky-net surged through the ranks with bold, practical play. A hallmark of the journey was a long winning streak, famously hitting 17 consecutive victories, which became club legend. The ascent culminated in earning the Candidate Master title from FIDE, a badge that marks Sky-net as one of the rising stars in the chess world. In Blitz, Sky-net peaked at 2138, a testament to fast, sharp combat on the clock.
Playing Style and Time Controls
Preferred time control: Blitz. Sky-net thrives on rapid-fire decisions, blending tactical acuity with practical resourcefulness. The style favors aggressive openings and dynamic positions that keep opponents guessing and clocks buzzing.
Opening Preference and Notable Openings
Sky-net has shown versatility across a wide opening repertoire in Blitz, including:
- English Opening and its Hyphenate family (Agincourt Defense, Symmetrical Variation)
- Sicilian Defense variants (Kan Variation, Knight Variation)
- Benko Gambit and Amar Gambit as sharp, surprise tools
Representative Moments
Sky-net is known for resilience and creative endgames. The player’s game history reveals a knack for turning near-defeats into winning triumphs, a trait that endears Sky-net to fans and fellow competitors alike.
Learn More
For a profile overview, see Sky-net. You can also explore a sample game:
What Sky-net does well in blitz
You tend to keep your pieces active and push for dynamic imbalances, especially when you steer the game toward sharp middlegame lines. Your openings show comfort with pieces in the center and quick development, which helps you create practical chances under time pressure. In several recent games you’ve demonstrated the ability to capitalize on tactical opportunities and convert pressure into clear plans.
- Active piece play early in the middlegame leads to practical attacking chances.
- Solid handling of typical English Opening structures, generating comfortable positions with clear plans.
- Resilience in complicated positions and willingness to seek tactical solutions when needed.
Key areas to improve (concrete actions)
- Time management in blitz: practice allocating a quick opening plan and a two-step middlegame plan for each game. Set a personal target to decide on a basic plan within the first 8–10 moves and stick to it unless a clear tactical shot appears.
- Blunder prevention in sharp lines: in tactically dense games, double-check forcing trades and recaptures before committing. When you feel time pressure, simplify rather than chase complications you’re not certain about.
- Convert pressure into wins: in balanced middlegames, push for concrete gains (pawn breaks, activity on open files) rather than remaining in long, indecisive battles. Create a simple plan to convert your initiative into a material or positional edge within 2–3 precise moves.
- Endgame practice for blitz clarity: strengthen rook-and-pawn endings and king activity themes so you can convert even small advantages efficiently when there’s little time left.
- Pattern recognition and puzzles: focus on common blitz motifs (back-rank ideas, forks, skewers, and discovered attacks) with a targeted puzzle routine of 15–20 minutes daily.
Opening guidance and repertoire focus
Your results with the English Opening and its variations (including the Symmetrical and Agincourt lines) are a strength. Maintain those as your core toolkit, since they tend to land you in comfortable middlegames with clear plans. You also show solid practical results in related lines like the Anglo-Indian and certain Benoni setups. Consider building a compact, easy-to-remember plan for the middlegame in each of these main lines so you can respond quickly under time pressure.
To keep things tight and consistent, you might adopt a small, focused repertoire for blitz: pick 2–3 main lines you play best (for example one English variation and one semi-symmetric reply) and 1-2 surprise options for opponents who deviate. If you’d like, I can propose a concise 2-month repertoire with move-by-move plan ideas. English Opening repertoire
Structured training plan for the next weeks
- Daily: 15–20 tactical puzzles focusing on motifs you encounter in your openings.
- Weekly: review your last 6 blitz games; identify 2 recurring mistakes and create quick-checks to avoid them (e.g., back-rank vulnerabilities, overextension, or unsound trades).
- Two-week cycle: practice a small endgame module (rook endings, king activity) with focused drills and simple decision rules.
- Time management drills: run 3+0 or 5+0 practice games, track time per move, and aim to keep a healthier clock afterward (target staying in a comfortable time margin by move 15).
- Opening consolidation: reinforce the chosen core lines with a short, practical middlegame plan you can recall quickly in blitz.
Quick encouragement and next steps
Your longer-term trend shows positive growth, which is a strong sign you’re building a solid foundation. The goal now is to convert that progress into consistently winning blitz gestures by tightening your opening plans, improving quick decision-making under pressure, and strengthening endgame technique.
Want a tailored 2-month repertoire outline or a focused daily puzzle plan? I can customize it to your preferred openings and typical opponent responses. Sky-net
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| notopfer | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| fianchetto95 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| eladbery1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ancora999 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| smaczek | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| just_klymba | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| nebojsadjokovic | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| divyam27 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| vahagn-yesayan | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| hatturogfattur | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| polina_k08 | 7W / 6L / 0D | |
| ariel_aryel | 3W / 6L / 0D | |
| ponekad tu | 0W / 9L / 0D | |
| gertelmaste | 0W / 8L / 0D | |
| tumewu | 3W / 5L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2023 | 2359 | ||
| 2024 | 1785 | 2061 | 2343 | |
| 2023 | 1995 | 2076 | 2340 | |
| 2022 | 1741 | 1930 | 1869 | 2301 |
| 2021 | 1741 | 1937 | 1378 | 2353 |
| 2020 | 1857 | 2000 | 2082 | |
| 2019 | 2006 | 2296 | ||
| 2018 | 2022 | 2249 | ||
| 2017 | 1981 | 2190 | ||
| 2016 | 1939 | 1973 | ||
| 2015 | 1904 | 1254 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 96W / 52L / 8D | 80W / 68L / 4D | 69.0 |
| 2024 | 91W / 27L / 7D | 78W / 42L / 7D | 68.1 |
| 2023 | 62W / 24L / 8D | 58W / 28L / 10D | 70.0 |
| 2022 | 206W / 99L / 11D | 169W / 129L / 23D | 69.0 |
| 2021 | 352W / 236L / 19D | 331W / 256L / 22D | 68.7 |
| 2020 | 231W / 158L / 19D | 214W / 175L / 15D | 67.3 |
| 2019 | 72W / 55L / 4D | 65W / 56L / 7D | 68.5 |
| 2018 | 52W / 37L / 11D | 48W / 43L / 7D | 71.0 |
| 2017 | 60W / 40L / 6D | 64W / 40L / 7D | 70.3 |
| 2016 | 45W / 24L / 6D | 41W / 27L / 4D | 69.3 |
| 2015 | 13W / 6L / 1D | 14W / 6L / 0D | 71.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening | 30 | 23 | 1 | 6 | 76.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 24 | 10 | 3 | 11 | 41.7% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 21 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 18 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 72.2% |
| Benko Gambit | 18 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 53.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Gipslis Variation | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 69.2% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 138 | 78 | 55 | 5 | 56.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 126 | 69 | 54 | 3 | 54.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 122 | 76 | 43 | 3 | 62.3% |
| English Opening | 115 | 72 | 40 | 3 | 62.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 109 | 60 | 43 | 6 | 55.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 105 | 63 | 36 | 6 | 60.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 104 | 68 | 33 | 3 | 65.4% |
| Benko Gambit | 103 | 54 | 45 | 4 | 52.4% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 101 | 56 | 41 | 4 | 55.5% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation | 87 | 50 | 34 | 3 | 57.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Fianchetto Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening | 86 | 45 | 39 | 2 | 52.3% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 71 | 40 | 30 | 1 | 56.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 68 | 33 | 35 | 0 | 48.5% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 64 | 45 | 18 | 1 | 70.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 62 | 33 | 26 | 3 | 53.2% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 50 | 24 | 25 | 1 | 48.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 45 | 27 | 16 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 44 | 20 | 23 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 44 | 26 | 18 | 0 | 59.1% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 40 | 13 | 25 | 2 | 32.5% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 1 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |