Краткая справка
Диомид Спасов — известный онлайн-шахматист, выступающий под ником Snowzz_Apex. Активно играет в 2023–2025 годах, предпочитает спокойный режим на долгие раздумья: Preferred time control — Daily. Этот игрок сочетает взрывной тактический стиль в блице и терпеливую, методичную игру в дэйли — словом, шахматный хамелеон с чувством юмора.
Ключевые слова для поиска: Диомид Спасов, Snowzz_Apex, шахматы, блиц, рапид, дэйли, онлайн-игры, тактика, эндшпиль.
Стиль игры
Диомид любит долгие, тонкие победы: высокий показатель частоты эндшпиля и длинные средние партии говорят сами за себя. В шутку можно сказать, что он не торопится — короли у него уходят в гости, пока ферзём улаживают формальности.
- Частота эндшпиля: 69.5%
- Средняя длина партии при победе: ~69 ходов
- Средний ход первой взятии: ~5.5
- Комбинационная стойкость: коэффициент камбэка ~80.6%
- Режим предпочтения: Daily
Достижения и пик формы
Диомид добился устойчивого прогресса во всех контролях времени, особенно в Bullet и Blitz, где частая практика привела к серьёзным результатам.
- Пиковые значения (поддерживаемые метками): 2103 (2025-07-29), 2051 (2025-09-10), 1958 (2025-09-10), 1602 (2024-03-02)
- Самая длинная победная серия: 22 партии; самая длинная проигрышная серия: 54 партии (да, и такое бывает)
- Частые возвращения в партию после сложных позиций: высокий ComebackRate ~80.6%
- График динамики рейтинга (фрагмент):
Любимые начала
Диомид часто экспериментирует, но у него есть явные фавориты — от дерзких гамбитов до надежных защит. Благодаря этому репертуару соперники никогда не скучают.
- Scandinavian Defense — Scandinavian Defense
- Amar Gambit — Amar Gambit
- Caro-Kann Defense — Caro-Kann Defense
- French Defense, Barnes Defense, Amazon Attack
В блице и рапиде часто проявляются острые идеи; в дэйли любимые линии проходят глубокую проработку.
Запоминающиеся партии
Одна из тех партий, где тактика и терпение встретились в дверях эндшпиля (просмотр через встроенный просмотрщик):
Пример партии (динамичная скандинавская линия):
Главные соперники
В репертуаре у Диомида есть регулярные встречные имена — с кем-то он чувствует себя вселенной, с кем-то — вечной загадкой.
- gmcanty — 7–102–1 (встреч: 110)
- witty_alien — 11–49–3 (63)
- illingworth — 0–54–0 (54)
- jimboislost — 23–26–2 (51)
- hunterwhiz — 39–3–1 (43) — довольно успешный оппонент!
Если хотите посмотреть профиль одного из частых соперников: Hunter Whisenant
Привычки и курьёзы
- Лучшее время для игры: около 12:00 по внутренним часам — тут у него максимальная продуктивность.
- Уровень «tilt»: 54 — иногда эмоции берут верх, но чаще Диомид возвращается и выигрывает.
- Early resignation rate небольшой — 1.9% — любит сражаться до конца.
- Средняя длина партий показывает готовность глубоко рассчитывать эндшпили и ставить мат в стиле «медленного пожирания».
Как следить
Хотите увидеть больше партий или найти конкретное открытие? В профиле есть подробная история по годам и по контролям времени, а также примеры партий и статистика по открытиям. Для быстрого входа в любимые термины используйте встроенные ссылки: Scandinavian Defense и Amar Gambit.
Quick summary for Диомид Спасов
Nice progress — your rating jumped a lot recently and you’ve started finishing games with clean tactical wins. You show strong pattern recognition for mating nets, but you still lose too many games from tactical oversights and mixed opening choices. Below are targeted, practical steps to turn your strengths into consistent wins.
Highlights — what you do well
- You spot and execute mating patterns quickly. Your wins include classic attacking motifs: a bishop sac on the king side followed by knight/queen follow-ups, and a decisive knight fork to finish — excellent instincts for mating nets (see the bishop sac on h7 in one of your recent wins: Greek gift ).
- You convert tactical chances when they appear — you calculate forcing sequences deep enough to finish the game.
- Your recent rating trend and big month-over-month jump show you are learning fast. Keep the momentum.
- You play actively — you try to create threats rather than passively wait, which produces more winning chances.
Main weaknesses to fix
- Tactical oversights in non-forcing positions: you win when the position is forcing, but lose when subtle tactics go the other way. Spend time on quiet tactics (overloads, pins, discoveries), not only mates.
- Inconsistent opening choices: your openings performance shows many different lines and several poor results with the same defenses. That makes the middlegame unfamiliar and increases mistakes.
- King safety and back-rank / exposed-king issues: a number of losses come from openings or pawn moves that weaken the king; prioritize safe development and castling when appropriate.
- Endgame basics and simplification decisions: when materially equal or slightly worse, trading into simplifications might be safer than entering tactical complications you haven’t calculated fully.
Concrete technical advice (with examples)
- Study the bishop-sac + knight/queen finish pattern you used in your wins. Practice the motif “bishop takes h7 (or h2) — knight jumps to g5/f7 or e6 — queen joins” until it’s automatic. You can replay one of your finishing sequences here: .
- Before pushing pawns or launching attacks, ask three short questions: (1) Are my pieces developed? (2) Is my king safe? (3) What are the opponent’s checks or captures next? This prevents easy tactical refutations and saves you from creating holes.
- When the position is unclear, trade one pair of minor pieces to reduce tactics and simplify — especially if your king is a bit exposed.
- Watch square control: your knight jumps to f7/e6 were very effective because you created or exploited weak squares in the opponent’s camp. Learn to value outposts and avoid placing knights on the rim — remember: Knight on the rim is dim.
Opening plan — simplify and specialize
- Pick 1–2 openings for White and 1–2 defenses for Black and learn the typical middlegame plans rather than many sidelines. Your openers list shows many “Unknown” / mixed results — consistency will reduce early mistakes.
- If you like sharp play, keep the lines that lead to attacking chances (you do well there). If you prefer safer strategy, choose solid systems (for example, a simple e4 repertoire like the Italian or a London setup as White; a reliable reply like the French or a classical Sicilian as Black).
- Create a one-page cheat sheet for each opening with: typical pawn breaks, where your knights/bishops should go, common tactical shots, and typical endgame transitions.
Tactics & calculation training plan
- Daily: 20–30 minutes of tactics puzzles focused on mating motifs, forks, pins, and sacrifices. Prioritize puzzles that are not immediate mates to train calculation in quiet positions too.
- Weekly: Solve 5–10 longer puzzles where you must calculate 4–6 moves. Pause and write candidate moves before calculating — this prevents jumping to the first attractive move.
- After each game: annotate 3 critical moments (your move, opponent’s move, and an alternative) — ask “what I missed?” and replay the line without engine first, then check with engine for confirmation.
Practical tips for daily games
- When you see a forcing sequence (checks, captures, threats) — calculate it fully. Those are your strengths; convert them.
- If you’re worse or unclear, trade pieces or aim for simplification rather than speculative attacks.
- Keep a short post-mortem routine: 1) mark the move you regret most, 2) find the better move, 3) record the pattern to practice later.
- Use short study sessions (15–30 minutes) consistently — your rating jump shows that regular focused practice works for you.
Suggested short training plan (next 4 weeks)
- Weekdays: 20 min tactics (mix mates and quiet tactics), 10 min opening review (flashcards of typical plans).
- Weekend: 1 annotated game — play, then spend 30–45 minutes annotating without engine, then check with engine. Focus on one recurring mistake each week.
- Monthly goal: reduce losses by 25% by improving error-checking (checks/captures/threats) before finalizing moves.
Resources & small exercises
- Practice basic mates (queen+rook vs king, knight+knight rarely) and common endgames — a few 10–15 minute sessions will pay off.
- Revisit the two recent tactical finishes and write down the patterns on index cards (Bxh7+, knight-sacrifice to e6/f7). Review the cards daily until they’re automatic.
- Review the loss to Chess_Elizabeth: go through move 16–22 slowly and ask what allowed White’s piece activity; mark pawn moves that opened your king or left important squares undefended.
Motivation & next steps
You’re improving rapidly — an 825 increase in one month is impressive. Keep the training compact and consistent. Focus first on shoring up king safety, a small opening repertoire, and targeted tactics practice. After that, your natural attacking instincts will convert many more games into wins.
If you want, I can prepare a 4-week training calendar tailored to how much time you have per day and a short opening cheat-sheet for one White and one Black setup. Also tell me which of your recent wins you'd like a deeper move-by-move review of (I can show critical positions and alternatives).
Extras / quick links
- Replay your tactical win (bishop sac -> mating net): interactive PGN above.
- Opponent examples you beat recently: remy-rook-bot, madame-mate-bot
- Study tip: keep a one-line note for every game titled “main lesson” — after 20 games you’ll have a powerful personalized training list.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| haarp06 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| pleasedontflag | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| samavati | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| kisshellow51 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| videvk | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| domin057390 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| onlyfrankchess | 0W / 4L / 2D | View |
| scaryducky | 9W / 25L / 2D | View |
| master297865 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| saiteja1000 | 7W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| James Canty | 7W / 102L / 1D | View Games |
| Volen Dyulgerov | 11W / 49L / 3D | View Games |
| Max Illingworth | 0W / 54L / 0D | View Games |
| jimboislost | 23W / 26L / 2D | View Games |
| Hunter Whisenant | 39W / 3L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2103 | 2051 | 1958 | |
| 2024 | 2103 | 2025 | 1856 | 1602 |
| 2023 | 1674 | 1725 | 1512 | 777 |
| 2022 | 100 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 185W / 85L / 10D | 168W / 87L / 5D | 74.0 |
| 2024 | 1924W / 903L / 122D | 1732W / 1090L / 118D | 69.9 |
| 2023 | 1295W / 1009L / 119D | 1294W / 1031L / 116D | 68.6 |
| 2022 | 0W / 4L / 0D | 1W / 4L / 0D | 29.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 759 | 427 | 303 | 29 | 56.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 482 | 284 | 182 | 16 | 58.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 434 | 263 | 163 | 8 | 60.6% |
| Unknown Opening* | 271 | 172 | 90 | 9 | 63.5% |
| French Defense | 225 | 136 | 87 | 2 | 60.4% |
| Czech Defense | 220 | 124 | 88 | 8 | 56.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 217 | 132 | 81 | 4 | 60.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 208 | 116 | 83 | 9 | 55.8% |
| Australian Defense | 183 | 106 | 69 | 8 | 57.9% |
| Modern | 182 | 113 | 63 | 6 | 62.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 76 | 40 | 26 | 10 | 52.6% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 59 | 31 | 20 | 8 | 52.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 45 | 27 | 13 | 5 | 60.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 45 | 24 | 13 | 8 | 53.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 41 | 30 | 8 | 3 | 73.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 37 | 23 | 13 | 1 | 62.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 36 | 20 | 11 | 5 | 55.6% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 28 | 17 | 8 | 3 | 60.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 25 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 68.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 22 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 95.5% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 228 | 127 | 90 | 11 | 55.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 193 | 116 | 68 | 9 | 60.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 158 | 91 | 57 | 10 | 57.6% |
| Scotch Game | 120 | 77 | 33 | 10 | 64.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 104 | 53 | 42 | 9 | 51.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 95 | 43 | 46 | 6 | 45.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 91 | 44 | 45 | 2 | 48.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 90 | 51 | 36 | 3 | 56.7% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 86 | 52 | 32 | 2 | 60.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 73 | 44 | 25 | 4 | 60.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 12.5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Three Knights Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 5 |
| Losing | 54 | 0 |