SoyLatte17 - Woman FIDE Master
Meet SoyLatte17, a chess player who sips strategy like a fine latte — carefully, artfully, and with plenty of bold moves. Awarded the prestigious title of Woman FIDE Master, SoyLatte17 blends experience with a dash of daring across all time controls, but especially shines in the fiery world of bullet and blitz chess.
Rating & Performance Highlights
- Peak Bullet rating: 2085 in 2024, with a fingerprint on over 1,000 games revealing a dogged win rate around 52% using a topsy-turvy "Top Secret" opening strategy(s).
- Blitz warrior with a maximum of 2052, known to turn up the heat when the clock ticks down.
- Rapid play isn’t left behind — a proud peak rating of 2088, proving SoyLatte17 doesn’t just blitz but reigns with elegant precision.
Playing Style & Tactics
SoyLatte17 is quite the chess chameleon: an endgame enthusiast who sees the battlefield until the very last piece falls, with an impressive 77% frequency in endgames. Games tend to be marathons, averaging over 67 moves per win, showing resilience and a liking for deep strategic battles rather than quick strikes – except when sprinting in Bullet!
Despite a modest early resignation rate of just 0.75%, they never back down easily and demonstrate remarkable resilience with a phenomenal 87% comeback rate after setbacks. In fact, losing a piece rarely means defeat, as their win rate after losing material stands at a perfect 100% – a true testament to tactical tenacity!
Opponent Conquests & Streaks
From the mysteriously named “bigwinnerhere” to the elusive “zirk24,” SoyLatte17 has faced a wide spectrum of rivals. They boast a terrifying winning streak glory, with a longest unbeaten run of 9 games, and they currently hold a fresh winning momentum.
When & How They Play
With a clear preference for prime-time battles, SoyLatte17 dominates most on Friday afternoons and mornings around 6 AM (yes, early bird or really committed night owl?). Their best wins come between 4 AM and 7 AM, with win rates inching above 60%, and they skillfully avoid the notorious "tilt," holding an impressively low tilt factor of 8 in the mood department.
A Fun Fact
Despite the high stakes and cruel chess world, SoyLatte17 keeps their cool and humor intact — because even a grandmaster knows, the best victories come after a good laugh... or a perfectly brewed cup of coffee.
Hi SoyLatte17! 👋
You are a dynamic 1700–2000-level player whose games are rarely boring. You show a clear willingness to seize the initiative and steer the position into sharp, tactical waters. Below is a balanced review of your recent play, followed by an actionable study plan. (Numbers are drawn from your last 15 rapid/blitz games.)
1. What you already do well
- Piece activity & tactical alertness. In wins against j-tobler and BetweenBlunders you out-calculated your opponents, using …Bb4+, …f6, …h5 motifs to open lines and pile up on f- and g-files.
- Handling open Sicilian structures as Black. The victories in the Modern-Defence and Indian-Game demonstrate that you know when to strike in the centre with …d5 and how to relocate knights to c4/e4 for pressure.
- Finishing ability. When you’re ahead you convert efficiently—four of your last six wins ended in checkmate or resignation before move 32.
- Healthy game volume & consistency. Your activity chart shows few big gaps: . Consistent play accelerates improvement.
2. Main improvement themes
- Over-ambitious pawn storms as White. In two recent losses (vs ezxcvsm & Teminatorm) early g4/h4 pushes weakened f3/e4 squares and invited decisive counter-tactics (10…Nxg4!). Try delaying flank pawns until your centre is secure.
- Blunder filtering. Both losses above hinged on overlooking one-move tactics. Your puzzle-rating trend (if similar to game trend) suggests calculation depth can improve. Adopt a “scan for checks, captures, threats” routine before every move.
- Endgame & rook-handling. Versus northw00d you reached an equal rook ending but failed to activate the king and resigned a few moves later. More endgame study will convert these half-points.
- Clock management. The time-forfeit vs samiromerbegovic and multiple sub-20-second scrambles hint that you spend too long in the opening. Aim to keep >50% of your initial time until move 15.
3. Targeted training plan (4-week block)
- Daily tactics (15 min). Two sets: one “untimed accuracy” (calculate until 100% sure) and one “speed” set (Puzzle Rush / Storm) to simulate practical pressure.
- Endgame essentials (2 hrs per week).
- King + rook vs king + rook: active king rule, cutting-off technique, Lucena & Philidor.
- Pawn endings: opposition & “square” concept.
- Opening hygiene.
- Add a solid Italian branch (e.g. d3/0-0-0 plans or the Giuoco Pianissimo) to complement your sharp lines.
- With Black, pick one anti-Sicilian you struggle against and analyse 5 master games; update your notes.
- Post-mortem routine. After every session, pick one win & one loss; spend 10 min identifying the first moment Stockfish shows ±1.5 and write why the evaluation changed.
- Blitz discipline drill (3 games, 5 + 2). Force yourself to move within 20 seconds for the first 12 moves; focus on safe development & 0 blunders rather than fancy lines.
4. Milestones to track
- Reduce average centipawn loss by 4 points over the next 30 games.
- Reach 2052 (2023-07-18) + 50 by month-end.
- No time losses in the next 20 games.
5. Stay motivated!
Improvement isn’t linear—celebrate small gains and use losses as data. You’ve already built a versatile repertoire and a fighting style; refine the calculation discipline and endgame technique to unlock the next rating band.
Good luck, and see you on the leaderboard!
Optional stats for later review:
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| zirk24 | 3W / 5L / 0D | |
| poulioss | 5W / 2L / 0D | |
| turnipcow | 6W / 1L / 0D | |
| swift30 | 2W / 4L / 0D | |
| nerner1973 | 0W / 5L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2042 | 1696 | ||
| 2024 | 2046 | 1856 | 2088 | |
| 2023 | 1842 | 1971 | ||
| 2022 | 1959 | |||
| 2021 | 1982 | 1884 | 1986 | 1476 |
| 2020 | 1791 | 1790 | ||
| 2019 | 1812 | 1855 | 1476 | |
| 2018 | 1834 | 1789 | 1800 | 1476 |
| 2017 | 1800 | 1785 | ||
| 2016 | 1870 | 1728 | 1499 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2W / 4L / 0D | 2W / 4L / 0D | 70.2 |
| 2024 | 22W / 19L / 0D | 22W / 12L / 5D | 74.6 |
| 2023 | 3W / 4L / 0D | 4W / 2L / 1D | 75.1 |
| 2022 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 63.5 |
| 2021 | 41W / 19L / 5D | 31W / 31L / 2D | 70.8 |
| 2020 | 7W / 12L / 1D | 7W / 13L / 1D | 70.7 |
| 2019 | 53W / 42L / 2D | 45W / 48L / 4D | 73.4 |
| 2018 | 146W / 121L / 2D | 138W / 127L / 9D | 71.6 |
| 2017 | 14W / 18L / 0D | 20W / 10L / 1D | 66.0 |
| 2016 | 35W / 27L / 2D | 43W / 25L / 0D | 58.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 64 | 31 | 32 | 1 | 48.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 41 | 23 | 17 | 1 | 56.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 39 | 23 | 16 | 0 | 59.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 36 | 15 | 17 | 4 | 41.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 35 | 23 | 10 | 2 | 65.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 31 | 12 | 19 | 0 | 38.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 30 | 17 | 13 | 0 | 56.7% |
| Modern | 28 | 15 | 11 | 2 | 53.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 25 | 12 | 11 | 2 | 48.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 25 | 19 | 6 | 0 | 76.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Scotch Game | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Döry Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 9 | 1 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |