Nicolas Checa — The SPEEDSKATER of Chess
Meet Nicolas Checa, a Grandmaster whose chessboard wizardry can make pawns tremble and bishops bow! Rising from youthful enthusiasm to the dizzying heights of a FIDE Grandmaster title, Nicolas has shown that speed and strategy can coexist, sometimes with explosive results.
Rating Rockets 🚀
With a peak blitz rating soaring to an incredible 3060 as of January 2025, Nicolas is practically a speed demon on the 64 squares. Bullet enthusiasts beware — his top bullet peak is a strong 2955. Rapid and classical? Still impressive, with a rapid peak rating of 2488.
Playing Style: The Art of Endgames & Comebacks
Nicolas has a penchant for late-game fireworks, boasting a high endgame frequency of 86.19%. He’s got a knack for snatching victories even after stumbling, with an astonishing 88.93% comeback rate. Losing a piece? No sweat — there’s a 54.84% chance he’ll still steer the game to victory. Early resignation? Only 0.56% of the time because who gives up when the fun is just kicking off?
Record & Rivals
With over 4384 wins in blitz alone, Nicolas thrives in the fast and furious realm. Yet, even masters face challenges: his longest losing streak stands at 14 games, a humbling reminder that even a SPEEDSKATER occasionally hits a patch of ice.
Some of his most played opponents include the likes of yaacovn and want2lose — ironically named, since Nicolas seems to bundle up many wins against them. His whimsical username SPEEDSKATER perfectly sums up his lightning-quick tactics and relentless pace.
Recent Triumph
On June 4th, 2025, Nicolas showcased his strategic depth in a win against Alez_Nunez, relying on the Colle System Anti-Colle variation — a positional dance leading to a resignation victory. Whether it’s rapid-fire blitz or the thoughtful calm of rapid games, Nicolas knows how to skate circles around the competition.
Beyond the Board
While most mortals stick to a couple of openings, Nicolas has a vast repertoire covering everything from the Queen's Gambit Declined Ragozin Defense to the King’s Indian Defense Orthodox Variation — and his win rates across these lines prove he’s as versatile as he is fast.
With a win rate often hovering above 55% in blitz and a killer instinct that strikes best around 3 PM (his prime time), Nicolas is a force to reckon with, whether it’s a casual online blitz or a high-stakes tournament.
So the next time you hear the phrase "SPEEDSKATER on the ice," remember, it’s not just about snow and skates — it's about a chess Grandmaster slicing through the opposition at blitz speed!
Blitz Feedback Overview
Your recent blitz activity shows a balance of sharp attacking potential and moments where you can tighten the plan. The win demonstrates you can seize the initiative and finish a tactical sequence when the position cooperates. The loss highlights the importance of managing counterplay and keeping a clear middlegame plan against flexible defenses. The draws indicate you can hold balanced positions under pressure, but you could convert more of those opportunities into wins with a bit more consistency and structure.
What You Did Well
- You think actively when you have the initiative. In the winning game, you coordinated your pieces to create direct pressure on the opponent’s king, culminating in a decisive finish. This shows you’re comfortable converting initiative into a finish when the lines open up.
- Your willingness to pursue tactical ideas and lines is a valuable strength in blitz. When you spot a tactical sequence, you can exploit it to force practical gains even if the position gets sharp.
- You keep the pawn structure fairly solid in many games, which provides a reliable platform for piece activity and future breakthroughs.
Areas to Improve
- Balance aggression with solid development. In some blitz moments, it’s easy to overextend for a tactical blow. Practice a simple rule: if your king becomes exposed or you don’t have a concrete continuation, pause for a developing move that improves your piece coordination before launching further attacks.
- Develop a clear middlegame plan against flexible defenses (like the London System family you faced). Have a two-step plan: (1) contest the center and develop pieces to active squares, (2) identify a target or break that creates concrete counterplay or a better pawn structure.
- Endgame conversion. In positions where you reach a slight material or structural edge, practice converting that edge into a win. Work on common rook endings and minor-piece endings so you can lock in advantages rather than drifting into equal endings under time pressure.
- Time management in blitz. Allocate a quick, consistent tempo in the opening to reach a solid middlegame with time to calculate critical lines. After that, reserve time for the most forcing moments and avoid long, uncertain sequences unless you’re sure of the path forward.
Practical Training Plan (Next 2 Weeks)
- Choose two reliable openings you’re comfortable with for both colors and drill them in 15–20 minute blitz simulations. Focus on typical middlegame plans that arise from those openings so you have a predictable road map.
- Engage in daily tactical practice. Target 8–12 puzzles per day that emphasize patterns you’ve recently seen (pins, overloads, forced sequences). Review missed puzzles to understand the correct idea.
- Endgame basics: study one endgame pattern per week (for example rook endings with pawns, or knight vs bishop endings) and play short drills to reinforce conversion techniques.
- Post-game reflection: after each blitz session, write down your two biggest mistakes and one strong decision you made, plus one alternative you could have played in the same moment.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Artem Dyachuk | 0W / 3L / 0D | View |
| panabong | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Danger_in_prime | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| just_bahodirovv | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| manu_na | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| XTFChess | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Dimitar Mardov | 1W / 3L / 1D | View |
| Etienne Bacrot | 3W / 6L / 1D | View |
| sedrak-matevosyan | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| jll2006 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Yaacov Norowitz | 57W / 77L / 25D | View Games |
| Safal Bora | 47W / 52L / 14D | View Games |
| Alexander Rustemov | 51W / 37L / 18D | View Games |
| Daniel Naroditsky | 33W / 57L / 8D | View Games |
| lIlIlIlI_lIl | 53W / 32L / 8D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2828 | 2948 | ||
| 2024 | 2872 | 2979 | ||
| 2023 | 2870 | 2783 | 2238 | |
| 2022 | 2620 | 2845 | ||
| 2021 | 2739 | 2792 | 2238 | |
| 2020 | 2808 | 2771 | 2409 | |
| 2019 | 2512 | 2678 | 2488 | |
| 2018 | 2553 | 2708 | 2459 | |
| 2017 | 2425 | 2438 | 2380 | |
| 2016 | 2415 | 2327 | 2010 | 1240 |
| 2015 | 2044 | 2276 | ||
| 2014 | 1893 | 2003 | 1495 | |
| 2013 | 1777 | 1796 | 1545 | |
| 2009 | 1093 | |||
| 2008 | 1322 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 343W / 161L / 60D | 283W / 203L / 75D | 93.3 |
| 2024 | 406W / 184L / 77D | 376W / 211L / 73D | 91.6 |
| 2023 | 407W / 230L / 89D | 390W / 260L / 89D | 93.4 |
| 2022 | 104W / 52L / 13D | 105W / 55L / 8D | 80.6 |
| 2021 | 363W / 185L / 61D | 327W / 207L / 68D | 87.7 |
| 2020 | 699W / 416L / 120D | 679W / 421L / 139D | 87.5 |
| 2019 | 359W / 192L / 73D | 338W / 230L / 73D | 88.3 |
| 2018 | 205W / 125L / 28D | 197W / 124L / 42D | 85.2 |
| 2017 | 128W / 73L / 13D | 119W / 83L / 18D | 82.7 |
| 2016 | 132W / 77L / 14D | 130W / 74L / 16D | 80.1 |
| 2015 | 120W / 50L / 10D | 101W / 65L / 12D | 75.0 |
| 2014 | 67W / 43L / 9D | 66W / 41L / 7D | 78.9 |
| 2013 | 44W / 17L / 10D | 45W / 26L / 3D | 70.8 |
| 2009 | 2W / 7L / 1D | 0W / 11L / 0D | 26.3 |
| 2008 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 26.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 337 | 187 | 116 | 34 | 55.5% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 312 | 173 | 95 | 44 | 55.5% |
| French Defense | 305 | 177 | 101 | 27 | 58.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 269 | 136 | 99 | 34 | 50.6% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 263 | 152 | 84 | 27 | 57.8% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 252 | 124 | 91 | 37 | 49.2% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 251 | 161 | 52 | 38 | 64.1% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 242 | 131 | 80 | 31 | 54.1% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 241 | 122 | 104 | 15 | 50.6% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 226 | 113 | 76 | 37 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 148 | 84 | 53 | 11 | 56.8% |
| Australian Defense | 137 | 91 | 37 | 9 | 66.4% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 121 | 76 | 38 | 7 | 62.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 107 | 54 | 42 | 11 | 50.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 105 | 61 | 38 | 6 | 58.1% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 96 | 57 | 29 | 10 | 59.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 82 | 54 | 25 | 3 | 65.8% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 79 | 45 | 27 | 7 | 57.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 71 | 44 | 22 | 5 | 62.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 68 | 35 | 32 | 1 | 51.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 25.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapport-Jobava System | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |