Høgni Egilstoft Nielsen - The International Master with a Tactical Twist
Known in the chess sphere by the formidable username ST-Sandavagur, Høgni Egilstoft Nielsen is no ordinary player. Earning the esteemed International Master title from FIDE, Høgni mixes deep strategic knowledge with an appetite for exciting play — and a dash of flair that can bewilder even the staunchest grandmaster.
With a peak daily rating soaring to 2206 in early 2021 and an astonishing bullet rating that climbed up to 2976 in March 2025, Høgni clearly feels at home both in thoughtful, classical games and the lightning-quick world of bullet chess. Not to mention their rapid rating peak of 2387 showing that speed and precision make an excellent combo in their arsenal.
But rating only tells part of the story. Høgni boasts a jaw-dropping longest winning streak of 45 games and maintains a commendable overall win rate across formats, often winning with the elegance and subtlety of a seasoned maestro. Their games tend to be lengthy affairs, averaging nearly 75 moves per win, proving they love a good, classic battle, not just quick-fire victories.
A tactical magician, Høgni displays an impressive 85.95% comeback rate — yes, when things look bleak, they're just warming up! Plus, with a solid 58.06% win rate after losing a piece, it’s clear giving material away is more a clever trap than a blunder in their playbook.
Opponents beware: Høgni’s style combines patience, precision, and bursts of aggressive ingenuity. They frequently employ the Alapin Sicilian Defense and variations of the Italian Game, enjoying a win rate hovering around 60-70% in these openings. Their nuanced understanding also extends to less trodden paths like the Dutch Defense and Alekhine’s Defense, where their win rates climb impressively.
Outside of the stats, Høgni is a fascinating character. Their psychological resilience is notable, with a relatively low tilt factor and a best playing time often around dawn (the 4 AM club knows!). Perhaps they are working the brain while the rest of us dream—or plotting their next sneaky checkmate over a late-night coffee.
Recently, Høgni dazzled their fans with a shining victory against RantomOpening, winning by a clean and clever checkmate in a beautifully played Alapin Sicilian Defense. Their ability to control the board and time has seen many such triumphs, confirming the mantra: play fast, play smart, and play with heart.
Whether firing off bullets in rapid succession or crafting a masterpiece in long games, Høgni Egilstoft Nielsen stands tall as a chess warrior who loves the game as much as they love winning it.
What you’re doing well in rapid chess
You show a willingness to take the initiative and test sharp lines, which creates practical chances in many games. Your willingness to engage in dynamic, tactical middlegames helps you stay in control and keeps your opponents under pressure. You also demonstrate solid comfort with a variety of openings, which gives you flexible options depending on what your opponent plays.
- You actively seek positions where your pieces have scope and your opponent has to respond to threats.
- You manage the opening phase with confidence in several sharp families, leading to playable middlegames where you can press your advantages.
- Your willingness to experiment with aggressive ideas often yields practical chances to win or complicate matters in your favor.
Areas to focus on for stronger results
- Develop a clear middlegame plan after each opening. In rapid games, having a simple, concrete plan (for example targeting a weak pawn, controlling key files, or coordinating a minority attack) helps prevent unfocused moves and keeps your game cohesive.
- Improve endgame technique to convert advantages more reliably. Practice common rook and pawn endings, and work on simple king activity ideas so you can push winning chances in longer rapid games.
- Strengthen calculation under time pressure. Practice shorter, precise sequences and learn to prune unproductive lines quickly so you don’t get overwhelmed by multiple candidate moves.
- Time management in the opening and early middlegame. Build a steady pace, reserve a small amount of time for critical moments, and avoid rushing decision-making when the position becomes tactical.
Opening themes to reinforce
Your results across several openings suggest strong practical performance in targeted lines. Consider deepening your understanding of these ideas to turn more positions into favorable outcomes. Focus on clear plans and typical middlegame maneuvers in these families:
- Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation — keep building a simple, repeatable plan and review common middlegame ideas and piece coordination.
- Petrov’s Defense — continue refining knowledge of typical structures and regrouping ideas to maintain balance and seize chances when the opponent overextends.
- Blackburne Shilling Gambit — you’re applying it effectively; ensure you know the main replies and how to steer toward favorable endgames.
- Sicilian defenses (Alapin Variation) and Italian Game lines — map out typical break ideas and how to punish inaccuracies in replies.
Suggested study resources
To support the opening themes above, consider exploring these internal reference topics:
Practical training plan for the coming weeks
- Dedicate 15-20 minutes daily to tactical puzzles focusing on motifs that appear in your openings (forks, pins, discovered attacks).
- Review 2-3 recent rapid games after you finish playing, noting one or two errors and a concrete plan you would apply in similar positions.
- Play 2-3 training games per week focusing on a fixed opening from your repertoire to reinforce the planned middlegame ideas, then analyze with a coach or engine to validate the plan.
- Include 1 endgame study per week to improve your ability to convert advantages in longer rapid games.
Encouraging note
You are building a solid foundation in dynamic lines. By consistently applying targeted study to your openings and middlegame plans, you can turn more of your practical chances into decisive results in rapid events. Keep leveraging your strengths and use focused practice to raise your overall consistency.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tiago Pereira Rodrigues | 39W / 34L / 6D | |
| Robert Díaz Villagrán | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Will Moorhouse | 10W / 1L / 1D | |
| Patryk Chylewski | 5W / 1L / 0D | |
| Daniel Dominguez | 4W / 5L / 0D | |
| leebit02 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| vrml20 | 5W / 4L / 2D | |
| jorgerivera76 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| kenlonecarson | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| stealthyy | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| cockroachdolly | 176W / 97L / 9D | |
| Anselm Wagner | 100W / 68L / 5D | |
| Davit_Tiraturyan | 72W / 60L / 5D | |
| singular_chess_brain_cell | 89W / 35L / 5D | |
| Petros Trimitzios | 41W / 81L / 5D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2774 | 2754 | 2074 | |
| 2024 | 2860 | 2615 | 2387 | 2114 |
| 2023 | 2732 | 2491 | 2387 | 2062 |
| 2022 | 2632 | 2487 | 2217 | 2107 |
| 2021 | 2720 | 2570 | 2069 | 2085 |
| 2020 | 2604 | 2479 | 2028 | 2196 |
| 2019 | 2612 | 2443 | 1850 | 2041 |
| 2018 | 2600 | 2430 | 2067 | |
| 2017 | 2661 | 2507 | 2004 | |
| 2016 | 2553 | 2380 | 1845 | 2028 |
| 2015 | 2382 | 2262 | 1892 | 2037 |
| 2014 | 2307 | 2187 | 1790 | |
| 2013 | 2204 | 2040 | 1992 | |
| 2012 | 2229 | 1818 | 1966 | |
| 2011 | 2397 | 1923 | 2011 | |
| 2010 | 1759 | 2133 | ||
| 2009 | 2066 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1035W / 581L / 80D | 970W / 672L / 67D | 84.7 |
| 2024 | 1139W / 723L / 91D | 1014W / 834L / 96D | 83.4 |
| 2023 | 715W / 389L / 55D | 627W / 465L / 55D | 80.9 |
| 2022 | 1223W / 583L / 73D | 1130W / 675L / 86D | 80.7 |
| 2021 | 1393W / 632L / 98D | 1282W / 753L / 86D | 79.7 |
| 2020 | 639W / 308L / 42D | 573W / 361L / 52D | 80.9 |
| 2019 | 667W / 306L / 47D | 600W / 369L / 55D | 81.2 |
| 2018 | 685W / 397L / 73D | 634W / 434L / 60D | 80.3 |
| 2017 | 1056W / 454L / 85D | 976W / 543L / 94D | 82.2 |
| 2016 | 1005W / 508L / 110D | 867W / 630L / 105D | 76.5 |
| 2015 | 595W / 276L / 67D | 519W / 299L / 90D | 76.5 |
| 2014 | 195W / 118L / 22D | 190W / 124L / 14D | 79.3 |
| 2013 | 70W / 44L / 4D | 79W / 32L / 4D | 71.9 |
| 2012 | 21W / 6L / 4D | 15W / 13L / 1D | 74.4 |
| 2011 | 54W / 16L / 0D | 52W / 16L / 2D | 59.2 |
| 2010 | 41W / 16L / 1D | 39W / 12L / 3D | 61.5 |
| 2009 | 113W / 31L / 7D | 106W / 35L / 5D | 55.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 175 | 127 | 25 | 23 | 72.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 156 | 93 | 38 | 25 | 59.6% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 139 | 104 | 27 | 8 | 74.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 134 | 91 | 28 | 15 | 67.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 124 | 70 | 34 | 20 | 56.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 117 | 74 | 31 | 12 | 63.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 86 | 54 | 18 | 14 | 62.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 84 | 63 | 15 | 6 | 75.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 83 | 62 | 12 | 9 | 74.7% |
| Scotch Game | 79 | 47 | 21 | 11 | 59.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2852 | 1793 | 924 | 135 | 62.9% |
| Dutch Defense | 2131 | 1231 | 815 | 85 | 57.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1540 | 993 | 486 | 61 | 64.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1217 | 698 | 461 | 58 | 57.4% |
| Modern | 1198 | 730 | 421 | 47 | 60.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1136 | 706 | 379 | 51 | 62.1% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 1046 | 691 | 322 | 33 | 66.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 918 | 510 | 368 | 40 | 55.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 830 | 504 | 290 | 36 | 60.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 823 | 535 | 264 | 24 | 65.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 12 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Scotch Game | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 294 | 175 | 119 | 0 | 59.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 136 | 88 | 44 | 4 | 64.7% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 93 | 67 | 16 | 10 | 72.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 85 | 59 | 19 | 7 | 69.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 66 | 50 | 11 | 5 | 75.8% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 65 | 45 | 15 | 5 | 69.2% |
| Dutch Defense | 39 | 20 | 16 | 3 | 51.3% |
| Scotch Game | 38 | 24 | 12 | 2 | 63.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 37 | 23 | 10 | 4 | 62.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 36 | 26 | 8 | 2 | 72.2% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 45 | 0 |
| Losing | 18 | 3 |