Jonathan Hawkins (aka SumoHawk)
Grandmaster Extraordinaire and Relentless Chess Gladiator
Jonathan Hawkins, known in the online chess realm as SumoHawk, is no ordinary player—this Grandmaster has battled pawns, knights, and queens alike with a flair worthy of Shakespeare. Armed with a FIDE Grandmaster title, Jonathan’s chess journey reads like an epic saga of dazzling wins, strategic brilliance, and an occasional bout of humble online blunders.
Rating Rollercoaster & Playing Habits
Jonathan’s chess rating has traveled through the years much like a rollercoaster zooming through rapid and blitz modes. With a blistering peak rapid rating of 2590 in 2017, and blitz ratings comfortably perched in the high 2300s, this player combines speed, strategy, and cheeky tactics to keep opponents guessing.
Fun fact: Jonathan once scored a flawless 100% win rate against some opponents, while others might still be scratching their heads waiting for a rematch!
Favorite Openings: Top Secret (or just really, really good)
Ask Jonathan about their favorite openings, and you’ll get the cryptic answer: Top Secret. With win rates soaring above 70% in every time format—blitz, bullet, rapid, and daily—Jonathan’s opening repertoire keeps the competition on their toes and chess commentators sipping their coffee nervously.
Playing Style & Psychological Edge
- Endgame Enthusiast: Nearly 77% of Jonathan’s games see him dancing through the endgame with precision and grace.
- Comeback King: An astonishing 84% comeback win rate, proving no piece lost is a game lost. Count on SumoHawk to roar back from the brink!
- Winning by Waiting: Jonathan averages nearly 70 moves to victory, showing patience is truly a virtue.
Chess Streaks & Stats
Jonathan’s longest winning streak clocks in at an impressive 22 consecutive victories—enough to make even the toughest opponents break a sweat.
A Day in the Life (or Should We Say Hour?)
Timing is everything, and Jonathan knows it. Peak win rates spike around 22:00 with a magnificent 93.1%, and mornings at 9, 8, and noon boast perfect 100% scores. Clearly, mornings and late nights are prime hunting times for SumoHawk.
Community and Competition
Facing a variety of opponents online, from longtime rivals like sumoyoon (74% win rate) to newcomers who sometimes get the cold shoulder (looking at you, coin with 0% wins), Jonathan’s competitive spirit is as fierce as their tactical ingenuity.
Final Thoughts
Whether you're a chess enthusiast or just someone who appreciates strategic art wrapped in a battle of wits, Jonathan Hawkins (SumoHawk) is a player worth watching. Just don’t blink—you might miss the next brilliant checkmate or a sly grin behind the screen.
Jonathan, here’s a personalised review of your recent play
Your current profile highlights
- Peak Blitz rating: 2441 (2016-07-21)
- Peak Rapid rating: 2590 (2017-10-16)
- Typical playing hours →
- Weekly consistency →
What you’re already doing well
- Dynamic pawn play. Your most recent win (see diagram after 24…Kh7) shows excellent use of the c- and b-pawns to create a connected passer that decided the game.
Key moment:30.Nc6!broke through and forced Black into passive defence. - End-game technique. Converting the rook-and-queen ending with precise checks (moves 48-57) demonstrates good calculation when the position is simplified.
- Opening flexibility. You comfortably switch between 1.d4 systems and English/Réti structures, keeping your opponents out of their book.
Recurring issues to address
- King safety against lower-rated opponents.
Both of your 2025 losses came after premature pawn pushes (5.f4 & 13…g5) that opened files around your own king. Treat every opponent as 2500 until the handshake is over. - Over-ambitious central breaks without backup.
In the Chigorin loss you played 5…e4 and 9…f5 without finishing development, giving White easy targets.
REMEDY: Before pushing two centre pawns ask, “Are all my minor pieces participating?” – a simple prophylaxis check. - Time management.
• You flagged from a clearly winning rook ending on 2019-01-15.
• In several blitz games you reached move 30 with <10 s while your opponent kept >40 s.
Suggestion: Allocate a soft cap of 20 % of your clock for the first 15 moves; train this with 3 | 2 drills.
Targeted exercises
- King-hunt tactics: Solve 15 mating-net puzzles daily to sharpen your eye for resources like 13…Re8 & 24…Qg1# in your own loss.
- Model games with the French structure. Replay Korchnoi-Karpov (1978, game 17) – identical pawn chain to your win; note how Korchnoi timed c4-c5.
- Practical end-games: Rebuild this study from your win and play it vs. engine until you can mate within 20 s:
Opening housekeeping
• As White vs …d5: You score well with c4–c5 breaks; add 7.Be2 lines in the French exchange to avoid early queen swaps when you want complexity.
• As Black vs. 1.e4: Your Scandinavian sideline is fine for blitz, but consider a mainline Sicilian or 1…e5 to cut down on early queen excursions that cost you tempo and time.
Next-step plan (4 weeks)
- Week 1: Annotate every blitz game where your king is attacked; tag mistakes “KS” (King Safety).
- Week 2: Daily 15-minute session of only rook-and-pawn endings.
- Week 3: Play a themed mini-match (10 games) starting from move 4 of the position after 5…e4 in the Chigorin; aim for 70 %.
- Week 4: Review progress using the charts above; set a new peak-rating goal.
Stay disciplined, keep the king healthy, and you’ll break the next rating barrier soon. Good luck and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2541 | |||
| 2020 | 2341 | |||
| 2019 | 2212 | 2340 | 2047 | |
| 2017 | 2224 | 2358 | 2590 | 2042 |
| 2016 | 2076 | 2363 | 2101 | |
| 2015 | 2049 | 2278 | 2133 | 2033 |
| 2014 | 2273 | 2313 | 2027 | 2000 |
| 2013 | 2148 | 2388 | ||
| 2012 | 2346 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 51.5 |
| 2020 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 82.7 |
| 2019 | 6W / 2L / 0D | 5W / 1L / 1D | 63.0 |
| 2017 | 26W / 4L / 1D | 25W / 7L / 1D | 73.8 |
| 2016 | 14W / 2L / 3D | 15W / 4L / 0D | 65.4 |
| 2015 | 14W / 1L / 0D | 15W / 0L / 0D | 63.4 |
| 2014 | 38W / 9L / 0D | 35W / 11L / 3D | 65.3 |
| 2013 | 78W / 20L / 0D | 71W / 29L / 4D | 74.5 |
| 2012 | 123W / 34L / 8D | 108W / 48L / 9D | 77.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 35 | 28 | 6 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation | 28 | 19 | 8 | 1 | 67.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 26 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 80.8% |
| Slav Defense | 24 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 79.2% |
| Australian Defense | 17 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 58.8% |
| Modern | 15 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 86.7% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Czech Defense | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Australian Defense | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% |
| Modern | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 0 |
| Losing | 5 | 2 |