Jason Garfield - The National Master Extraordinaire
Known in the chess world by the moniker TacticalJesus, Jason Garfield is a National Master whose blitz games have dazzled and confused opponents alike since 2013. Born to bend the rules of traditional time controls, Jason’s skill peaks spectacularly in the realm of blitz and bullet chess.
Notable Milestones & Ratings Journey
- Achieved a blitz rating peak of an impressive 2700 in 2024, climbing steadily from a humble 1362 in 2013. Talk about a glow-up!
- Dominates the bullet scene too, with a peak rating surpassing 2700 in 2025, proving that speed doesn’t kill when you’re this good.
- Rapid and daily ratings, while slightly more laid-back, still showcase a strong competitive edge, with recent rapid ratings climbing to an impressive 2500+ level.
Warrior of Openings
Jason's weapon of choice usually revolves around the English Opening. Known for solid defensive systems like the Caro-Kann Defensive System and agile lines like the Anglo-Indian Defense, he doesn’t shy away from mixing classic with modern. Opponents beware – the English Opening Fianchetto Ultra Symmetrical Line and the English Opening Kings English Variation are habitual traps where many have fallen.
Playing Style
With an average of about 90 moves per game on wins and losses alike, Jason clearly enjoys a prolonged battle on the battlefield of 64 squares. Known for a 92.87% comeback rate and a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece, it's safe to say quitting is not in his dictionary. Trouble sets in for opponents when Jason's psychological resilience kicks in, countering moves with surgical precision.
Chess Personality & Fun Facts
Jason’s tilt factor is a mere 14, meaning a gloomy position only slightly detracts from his superhuman calm. In fact, he’s won 55.53% of his games playing White and holds a solid foothold with Black at 50.96% wins – talk about balanced.
Once notorious for the longest winning streak of 23 games, TacticalJesus’s legacy is a blend of brilliance, speed, and a dash of cheek. Known for snappy tactical retreats (early resignations happen only 0.37% of the time), Jason is the player you don’t want to face when the clock is ticking down.
Opponent Roll Call
Jason has squared off against hundreds of opponents, including many with names as quirky as "whereismytoaster," "rhetprof," and "escape_from_chess." Fans joke that you haven't truly tested your skill until you've been outwitted by TacticalJesus in under a minute.
Summary
A master tactician and speed chess virtuoso, Jason Garfield has successfully melded fast-paced intuition with strategic depth. A true national treasure in the chess community, Jason embodies the spirit of competitive play with a flair for stunning comebacks and rapid-fire victories. If chess were a high-speed chase, Jason would be both the driver and the getaway artist.
Positives in Your Recent Blitz Play
Jason, your recent blitz games showcase several strengths that are vital for consistent performance at your rating level:
- Opening Preparation: You have a strong grasp of English Opening variations, maintaining win rates over 50% across many complex lines. This shows good understanding and preparation in your chosen opening repertoire.
- Positional Awareness: Your games illustrate good positional play, particularly the capability to maximize piece activity and control key squares. You frequently exchange pieces to reach favorable endgames.
- Time Management: In the analyzed games, you manage your clock effectively, balancing deep strategic moves with the fast pace of blitz.
- Winning Key Exchanges: In winning games, you often successfully simplify when ahead, converting small advantages efficiently.
Areas for Improvement
To push your blitz performance further, consider focusing on:
- Avoiding Tactical Oversights: The losses pointed to tactical vulnerabilities, sometimes leading to quick material losses or mating nets. Regular tactical drills can reduce these errors.
- Endgame Precision Under Pressure: Some losses showed you allowing decisive threats in critical positions. Review key endgame techniques and practice converting or defending under time pressure.
- Deeper Calculation in Complex Positions: Occasionally, choosing the best continuation in sharp positions can be challenging in blitz. Training calculation depth and visualization will benefit you in these scenarios.
- Flexibility in Opening Choices: While your English Opening skills are excellent, occasionally mixing up your openings or move orders may throw opponents off balance and avoid predictability.
- Handling Time Trouble: Although your time management is good overall, maintaining full focus in the last critical moments can help avoid last-minute mistakes or blunders.
Overall Performance Trends
Your overall performance is very solid at the 2700 level, with a strength adjusted win rate of approximately 50%. Your rating has stabilized recently with consistent results. To continue improving:
- Maintain your focus on tactical sharpenings to minimize losses.
- Capitalize on your strong opening knowledge by expanding into new lines.
- Keep working on converting advantages and resilient defense in endgames.
- Consider deeper post-game analysis to spot recurring patterns or mistakes.
Next Steps
To build on your current strengths and address areas of improvement, you might want to:
- Incorporate daily short tactical puzzle sessions to keep your calculation sharp.
- Analyze complex positions from recent losses with a coach or engine, focusing on alternative plans and defensive resources.
- Review typical endgames arising from your openings to improve conversion skills.
- Experiment with mixed opening repertoires in some training games to develop adaptability.
- Use time management drills in blitz to practice calm decision-making under clock pressure.
These steps can help you maintain your rating at the elite level while steadily increasing your confidence and consistency.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| stellarchess | 15W / 33L / 4D | |
| theroyalsachin | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| xxfrostsoulxx | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| aishagarwal2008 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| mafioso2021 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| vlasikhin_maksim | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| absolutely_ches | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| rhadamanthys_wyvern | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| henry2300 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| mahmoud_187 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ivan Illiev | 101W / 53L / 18D | |
| Mark Kotliar | 97W / 53L / 17D | |
| fwilliams972 | 98W / 47L / 13D | |
| elseres | 73W / 50L / 21D | |
| grandemas | 81W / 35L / 13D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2705 | 2700 | 2550 | 2024 |
| 2024 | 2600 | 2700 | 2425 | 2024 |
| 2023 | 2656 | 2500 | 2121 | |
| 2022 | 2600 | 2121 | ||
| 2021 | 2605 | 2600 | 2121 | |
| 2020 | 2602 | 1809 | 2121 | 2128 |
| 2019 | 2455 | 2575 | 2121 | 2146 |
| 2018 | 2400 | 2410 | 2076 | |
| 2017 | 2514 | 2430 | 1997 | |
| 2016 | 2300 | 2363 | 1938 | 1925 |
| 2015 | 2121 | 2090 | 1934 | 1883 |
| 2014 | 1926 | 1943 | ||
| 2013 | 1900 | 2022 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 157W / 64L / 23D | 141W / 83L / 25D | 92.8 |
| 2024 | 390W / 198L / 59D | 360W / 244L / 61D | 95.6 |
| 2023 | 20W / 19L / 9D | 21W / 19L / 7D | 93.9 |
| 2022 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 36.2 |
| 2021 | 38W / 15L / 8D | 34W / 20L / 2D | 101.3 |
| 2020 | 265W / 168L / 37D | 262W / 175L / 43D | 89.5 |
| 2019 | 732W / 450L / 120D | 672W / 510L / 119D | 94.7 |
| 2018 | 127W / 83L / 30D | 123W / 98L / 23D | 94.7 |
| 2017 | 4669W / 2949L / 770D | 4182W / 3357L / 835D | 94.9 |
| 2016 | 2422W / 1702L / 497D | 2322W / 1828L / 435D | 94.1 |
| 2015 | 572W / 258L / 73D | 523W / 313L / 69D | 86.4 |
| 2014 | 296W / 182L / 23D | 220W / 236L / 38D | 87.4 |
| 2013 | 156W / 93L / 19D | 150W / 100L / 11D | 88.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 702 | 380 | 249 | 73 | 54.1% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 630 | 359 | 217 | 54 | 57.0% |
| English Opening | 624 | 323 | 238 | 63 | 51.8% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 525 | 285 | 186 | 54 | 54.3% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 489 | 282 | 155 | 52 | 57.7% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 477 | 257 | 175 | 45 | 53.9% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 437 | 229 | 156 | 52 | 52.4% |
| Döry Defense | 391 | 191 | 161 | 39 | 48.9% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 351 | 182 | 131 | 38 | 51.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 338 | 162 | 140 | 36 | 47.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 3266 | 1778 | 1169 | 319 | 54.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 806 | 439 | 305 | 62 | 54.5% |
| Australian Defense | 566 | 295 | 218 | 53 | 52.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 500 | 254 | 201 | 45 | 50.8% |
| King's Indian Attack | 480 | 267 | 170 | 43 | 55.6% |
| Czech Defense | 463 | 251 | 176 | 36 | 54.2% |
| Döry Defense | 445 | 216 | 184 | 45 | 48.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 403 | 224 | 135 | 44 | 55.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 392 | 212 | 147 | 33 | 54.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 314 | 185 | 107 | 22 | 58.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation, Alapin Gambit | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Evans Gambit Accepted, 5.c3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 32 | 24 | 7 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 23 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 87.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 17 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 70.6% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 13 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 84.6% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 12 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 83.3% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Modern Defense | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 63.6% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 77.8% |
| English Opening | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 71.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 23 | 1 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |