Profile of Arshaq Saleem (tactwiz)
Meet Arshaq Saleem, known in the chess universe by the cunning handle tactwiz. This National Master titleholder has been maneuvering pawns and castles with a mixture of grit, grace, and a sprinkle of luck on the chessboard since at least 2011. If chess were a grand theatrical play, Arshaq would be the unpredictable lead, sometimes dazzling the audience with brilliant combos, and other times causing suspense with nail-biting moments of recovery.
Rise and Rating
Starting from humble beginnings with a Blitz rating around 1330 back in 2011, Arshaq’s rating graph reads like the plot of a gripping thriller—full of ups, downs, and thrilling comebacks. By mid-2020, tactwiz peaked impressively with a Blitz rating of 2231 and a Bullet rating that even reached 2451, a territory where most mere mortals fear to tread. Not bad for a player who sometimes likely considers a "check" to be a question rather than a threat.
Playing Style & Psychology
Arshaq's style is one of endurance and strategy: averaging about 63 moves per victory and nearly as many in defeat. Their endgame presence is notable, with close to 70% endgame frequency—proof they don’t just run out the clock but fight hard to the bitter end. Also, they tend to maintain their cool, with a tilt factor of 19 (chess players, take note: keep calm and castle on!). However, the best time to challenge tactwiz is around 8 AM, a time when their tactical awareness is as sharp as a knight’s move.
Noteworthy Achievements
- Longest Winning Streak: An impressive 22 games, proving the capacity to ride a wave of dominance.
- Comeback Rate: A heroic 74.88%, meaning if you think you have this one in the bag, think again!
- Main Openings: Known for dabbling in the "Unknown Opening," a mysterious approach that has netted a respectable 56.69% win rate in Blitz games.
Recent Battles
In the latest recorded heat of battle, Arshaq showcased a sharp Sicilian Defense - Najdorf Variation, claiming victory by checkmate swiftly and decisively against FwydRising in June 2025. Not one to shy away, tactwiz frequently employs quick thinking and crafty tactics to turn the tides in their favor, often sealing the game with a flourish.
Unusual Tidbits
While many players might falter after a tough loss, Arshaq has endured losing streaks of up to 19 games, only to bounce back stronger. This resilience is not just commendable; it's downright inspirational for anyone who has had a bad day on the 64 squares.
Whether you face Arshaq on Bullet, Blitz, Rapid, or Daily chess, you can be sure you’re in for a game packed with deep thinking, creative moves, and the occasional cheeky sacrifice. After all, a National Master never reveals all their secrets—especially when the opening is "Unknown."
So, when you see tactwiz challenge you across the board, buckle up—you’re not just playing chess, you’re stepping into a tactical wizard’s realm!
Overall Performance Summary
Arshaq Saleem, over your recent games, your strength adjusted win rate is approximately 58%, which indicates a solid level of consistency and success against opponents of varied ratings. Your rating has shown positive movement over the past 1 and 3 months with an increase of 70 points. However, the 6-month trend reflects a slight dip with a loss of 42 points, suggesting fluctuations in performance that could benefit from focused improvement.
Recent Game Highlights
- You have demonstrated strong opening play with the English Opening variations, particularly showing competence in the Symmetrical and Anglo-Indian setups.
- Many wins came by forcing opponent resignation, illustrating good endgame or middle-game advantages that you successfully capitalized on.
- Your games often involve strategic pawn breaks and control of open files, especially with timely rook and queen maneuvers.
Areas for Improvement
- In losses, common themes include challenges in dealing with pressure in complex middlegame positions, such as the King's Indian Defense structures where opponents capitalize on tactical opportunities.
- Focus on improving defensive technique and tactical calculation in critical moments to avoid resignations against well-prepared adversaries.
- Consider studying typical plans and motifs in openings where you showed some difficulties, such as the King's Indian Defense, to deepen your positional understanding.
Suggested Training Focus
- Analyze lost games especially those where you faced pawn structure challenges or tactical complications to identify recurring mistakes.
- Enhance tactical vision by regular solving of puzzles themed around pins, forks, discovered attacks, and mating nets.
- Study endgame fundamentals especially rook and pawn endgames, as converting or defending endgames is a key to increasing solid results.
- Review and expand your knowledge in your preferred openings and also on sidelines your opponents commonly use.
Positive Trends
Your recent upward trends in rating indicate that your training and playing practice are effective. Keep up consistent study and game review to maintain and accelerate improvement.
Additional Resources
Continue leveraging Chess.com game review tools and consider focusing on openings like the English Opening, where you hold strengths. Use the annotation function to detail your thought process in complex positions for later review.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| master3748 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| whitebeard5 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ahmedramzy99 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| hamtea | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| marcusthebigd | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| jimmehh | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sang16423 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| kerolessaid | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| coolrook | 5W / 5L / 0D | View |
| jmanion373 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rockymonster22 | 77W / 23L / 4D | View Games |
| monkeync | 53W / 33L / 2D | View Games |
| rektboiswag | 64W / 5L / 2D | View Games |
| Gthangs | 21W / 42L / 7D | View Games |
| sagepsych | 31W / 28L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1947 | 2153 | ||
| 2024 | 1632 | 2151 | 2080 | |
| 2023 | 1844 | 2207 | 1842 | 2122 |
| 2022 | 2178 | 2162 | 1916 | 2037 |
| 2021 | 2128 | 2098 | 2017 | 2032 |
| 2020 | 2098 | 2131 | 2107 | 2195 |
| 2019 | 1627 | 2053 | 2195 | |
| 2018 | 1364 | 2030 | 1573 | 2232 |
| 2017 | 1844 | 2008 | 2089 | |
| 2016 | 1827 | 2047 | 1519 | 2113 |
| 2015 | 1639 | 1876 | 2032 | |
| 2014 | 1416 | 1732 | 1964 | |
| 2013 | 1290 | 1563 | 1690 | |
| 2012 | 1207 | 1471 | 1369 | |
| 2011 | 1058 | 1281 | 1365 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1015W / 874L / 14D | 921W / 953L / 26D | 62.9 |
| 2024 | 1031W / 935L / 21D | 973W / 993L / 19D | 60.5 |
| 2023 | 1841W / 1553L / 34D | 1730W / 1626L / 43D | 64.9 |
| 2022 | 1637W / 1321L / 44D | 1474W / 1463L / 41D | 65.2 |
| 2021 | 2107W / 1715L / 71D | 2080W / 1766L / 65D | 65.8 |
| 2020 | 1764W / 1481L / 58D | 1650W / 1586L / 74D | 64.9 |
| 2019 | 532W / 401L / 13D | 453W / 480L / 17D | 54.9 |
| 2018 | 420W / 344L / 20D | 374W / 379L / 17D | 55.8 |
| 2017 | 129W / 113L / 8D | 114W / 114L / 12D | 66.9 |
| 2016 | 103W / 56L / 7D | 77W / 87L / 0D | 61.0 |
| 2015 | 211W / 123L / 9D | 159W / 179L / 6D | 63.7 |
| 2014 | 219W / 155L / 7D | 228W / 141L / 11D | 57.5 |
| 2013 | 587W / 281L / 15D | 516W / 355L / 19D | 58.7 |
| 2012 | 320W / 225L / 5D | 277W / 251L / 6D | 54.3 |
| 2011 | 16W / 16L / 1D | 16W / 16L / 0D | 45.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 253 | 149 | 96 | 8 | 58.9% |
| Unknown | 130 | 70 | 59 | 1 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 128 | 62 | 60 | 6 | 48.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 100 | 51 | 47 | 2 | 51.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 99 | 58 | 39 | 2 | 58.6% |
| Australian Defense | 94 | 52 | 38 | 4 | 55.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 87 | 50 | 34 | 3 | 57.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 80 | 56 | 23 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Czech Defense | 76 | 44 | 32 | 0 | 57.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 74 | 46 | 26 | 2 | 62.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1954 | 1116 | 810 | 28 | 57.1% |
| Australian Defense | 1872 | 1034 | 809 | 29 | 55.2% |
| Modern | 1866 | 994 | 851 | 21 | 53.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 1248 | 644 | 595 | 9 | 51.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1134 | 635 | 477 | 22 | 56.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1096 | 561 | 516 | 19 | 51.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 1007 | 573 | 427 | 7 | 56.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 953 | 463 | 480 | 10 | 48.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 799 | 422 | 363 | 14 | 52.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 758 | 373 | 377 | 8 | 49.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Slav Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 17 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 58.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Elephant Gambit | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Modern | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 7 |
| Losing | 19 | 0 |