The_Fastest_Hand: A Bullet Queen and Tactical Wizard
Known across the chess realm as The_Fastest_Hand, this player’s journey is nothing short of a rollercoaster sprint through the lightning-fast world of bullet and blitz chess. From a humble 970 bullet rating in 2019 to a staggering peak of 2731 in 2025, The_Fastest_Hand has proven that speed with the mouse often matches speed of thought on the board.
With a bullet win rate hovering around 56%, 1763 wins out of nearly 3000 games, and a blitz rating hitting 2609, this player dominates the arena where reflexes and brains collide. Opponents beware: this isn’t just rapid-fire clicking—it’s tactical precision refined by over 4000 bullet games and an astonishing 99.92% win rate after losing a piece. Talk about turning lemons into championship lemonade!
The_Fastest_Hand may have zeroes on the calm rapid time control initially, but a jump to 2297 rapid rating in 2025 proves they’re no one-trick pony. The classic flair for endgames (77% of games reach them) and an average nearly 80 moves per win showcase determination; the game isn’t over until the last piece falls, even if adrenaline runs high.
Psychological resilience is the name of the game here. A comeback rate exceeding 90%, a tilt factor kept in check at 7, and a current winning streak that may have paused but hints at future fireworks. Matches against fan favorites like “guibertv,” “arthasmennethil,” and “epiclooser” often end in tears for the opposition, with near-perfect win records.
If speed equals victory, resilience equals legend. The_Fastest_Hand combines both with a sprinkle of mystery (thanks, “Top Secret” openings!) and a knack for bewildering foes with flashing pieces and quicker decision-making than lightning strikes. No wonder the username fits like a glove.
When not crushing opponents under blistering time constraints, The_Fastest_Hand probably dreams in rapid-fire forks, swift pins, and checkmates delivered before opponents can blink. Chess clocks beware, this profile belongs to a player who turns “fastest” into an art form.
Overall assessment
You're playing a bold, tactical style in rapid games. You often seize the initiative with sharp openings and create active attacking chances. Your openings like the Modern Defense family and certain gambit lines show you can unsettle opponents and force difficult middlegames. At the same time, some risky choices have led to time pressure and tactical collapses. The plan below focuses on keeping your strengths while smoothing out recurring mistakes.
What you’re doing well
- You generate practical problems for opponents early, especially in dynamic openings, which helps you reach favorable middlegames.
- You calculate aggressively and can convert tactical opportunities into decisive results when your attack is well-timed.
- Your opening versatility lets you surprise opponents and put them on the back foot in rapid games.
- When you reach a complex position, you stay active and keep the pressure on, which increases your chances of forcing mistakes.
- Your willingness to engage sharp lines indicates good preparation and confidence in tricky middlegames.
Opening performance highlights
Your opening choices show strong results in several lines. Keep refining the ideas behind these setups and pair them with solid middlegame plans. Noting that some openings have smaller sample sizes, they still point to reliable pathways:
- Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation — high win rate, great for taking the initiative and creating attacking chances. Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation
- QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 — solid in several games with clear ideas for the middlegame. QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5
- Barnes Defense — shows solid, patient play with reasonable winning chances. Barnes Defense
- Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit — very strong in the sample; useful when you want dynamic play. Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit
- Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 — high success in a few games, good test bed for tactical motifs. DDG: 4...f5
- Sicilian: Accelerated Dragon lines — solid results; continue expanding here with emphasis on concrete middlegame plans. Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon
Time management and practical play
- Rapid games with sharp tactical themes benefit from a disciplined time plan. Try allocating time to identify the main plan by the 10th move and avoid deep, non-forcing calculations when there’s no clear tactic on the board.
- Develop a quick, reliable routine for the middle game: after the first 12 moves, ask yourself what your long-term plan is and what threats your opponent is posing.
- When the clock gets tight, switch to solid, straightforward plans rather than hunting flashy combinations. This helps reduce blunders and keeps you competitive even under pressure.
Endgame and conversion
Strengthen the ability to convert advantages into wins in rook endings and simplified middlegames. Practical tips:
- Keep the king active and central in rook endings and seek open files for your rooks to dominate the position.
- Be mindful of overextension; when the position simplifies, ensure your pawn structure and piece activity support a clear plan toward victory rather than a drawn scramble.
Two-week training plan
- Daily tactical puzzles (15–20 minutes) focusing on forks, discovered checks, and back-rank motifs to sharpen calculation under time pressure.
- Opening study: dedicate two weeks to a primary high-win opening family (for example, Week 1 Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation, Week 2 Slavic Bonet Gambit) and learn typical middlegame plans and common tactical ideas within those lines.
- Post-game review: after each rapid game, write two notes — the main plan you attempted and a turning moment where a safer line could have been chosen.
- Play one longer game per day and spend 10–15 minutes afterward reviewing the critical early moves and the key middlegame decision points.
Optional review aids
If you’d like, I can provide a concise annotated recap of your last several rapid games, highlighting turning points and concrete improvements. I can also attach annotated PGNs on request to help you study specific moments.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alexey Furtuna | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| ChessMatic_Weapon | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| drago89 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| jamengrand | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| nicentgmchess2009 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Or Globus | 3W / 4L / 0D | |
| Road_to_3OOO | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Eric Lobron | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| stronghg_pcap | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| natanzinho2 | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gamayevoleg | 15W / 9L / 6D | |
| Never_walk_alone | 10W / 13L / 1D | |
| sberba1 | 15W / 7L / 1D | |
| olegsfo | 10W / 8L / 2D | |
| Jonathan Tayar | 7W / 11L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2705 | 2604 | 2281 | |
| 2022 | 2561 | 2356 | ||
| 2021 | 2423 | 2297 | 2297 | |
| 2020 | 2337 | 2458 | 1745 | |
| 2019 | 2365 | 2308 | 1745 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 425W / 268L / 57D | 389W / 306L / 69D | 83.4 |
| 2022 | 10W / 2L / 2D | 10W / 3L / 2D | 83.8 |
| 2021 | 456W / 301L / 65D | 445W / 328L / 51D | 78.3 |
| 2020 | 326W / 244L / 41D | 303W / 265L / 28D | 78.5 |
| 2019 | 337W / 173L / 14D | 357W / 150L / 24D | 73.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 122 | 76 | 34 | 12 | 62.3% |
| Benko Gambit | 90 | 46 | 35 | 9 | 51.1% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 62 | 39 | 17 | 6 | 62.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 62 | 30 | 26 | 6 | 48.4% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 50 | 27 | 21 | 2 | 54.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 46 | 22 | 20 | 4 | 47.8% |
| Australian Defense | 45 | 22 | 23 | 0 | 48.9% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 44 | 28 | 12 | 4 | 63.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 43 | 28 | 11 | 4 | 65.1% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line | 41 | 30 | 9 | 2 | 73.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 310 | 165 | 130 | 15 | 53.2% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 278 | 145 | 112 | 21 | 52.2% |
| Australian Defense | 158 | 96 | 55 | 7 | 60.8% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 126 | 77 | 39 | 10 | 61.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 116 | 61 | 50 | 5 | 52.6% |
| Döry Defense | 108 | 62 | 40 | 6 | 57.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 105 | 62 | 36 | 7 | 59.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 96 | 61 | 32 | 3 | 63.5% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 94 | 56 | 31 | 7 | 59.6% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 94 | 51 | 41 | 2 | 54.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 11 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 81.8% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Russian, 7.e4 Nfd7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Benko Gambit | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 25 | 1 |
| Losing | 7 | 0 |