Biography
Mohamed Anees M is an International Master who has become a notable figure on the modern chess circuit. Known for his bold Blitz play, razor-sharp tactics, and tireless study habits, he has carved a path through national events and online arenas alike. The FIDE title confirms his status among the world’s rising talents, and his quick-fire decisions at the keyboard frequently leave opponents chasing shadows across the board. His sense of humor is a welcome companion on long tournaments—he jokes that his coffee is the true time control behind every decisive move.
For a visual snapshot of his progression, see
and learn more in his profile: mohamed_anees_m.Career Highlights
- FIDE International Master title earned.
- Peak Blitz rating reached 2908 (2025-03-09).
- Longest winning streak: 27 games.
- Strong, consistent results across multiple Blitz events in 2022–2025.
Opening Style and Repertoire
Mohamed Anees M builds his Blitz repertoire across a wide array of openings, with concrete showcase lines including the Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation, the London System, and several Sicilian and Nimzo-Larsen setups. His results reflect a readiness to balance strategic plans with sharp, tactical opportunities when the position opens:
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — Blitz: 94 games, 66 wins, 22 losses, 6 draws (Win rate 70.21%).
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation — Blitz: 139 games, 60 wins, 65 losses, 14 draws (Win rate 43.17%).
- Sicilian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation — Blitz: 94 games, 50 wins, 37 losses, 7 draws (Win rate 53.19%).
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack — Blitz: 93 games, 42 wins, 47 losses, 4 draws (Win rate 45.16%).
- Sicilian Defense: Closed — Blitz: 91 games, 44 wins, 40 losses, 7 draws (Win rate 48.35%).
Playing Style
- Preferred time control: Blitz.
- High come-from-behind potential (comeback rate around 89%).
- Endgames are a frequent battleground (endgame frequency around 81%).
- End-to-end tactical awareness and a willingness to complicate positions to maximize practical chances.
Notable Moments
Mohamed Anees M has crafted a career characterized by resilience and growth, culminating in a peak Blitz rating of 2908 in early 2025. His longest winning streak stands at 27 games, a testament to his capacity to convert pressure into momentum during tournaments.
Overview and focus
Great work staying introspective and using your recent results to guide improvement. Your strength is growing across a mix of openings, and your trend data shows steady progress over multiple time frames. The openings data highlights several reliable paths that you can lean into for consistent blitz success.
What you’re doing well
- You are comfortable playing a variety of openings and still finding good results. The opening performance shows solid win rates in both solid systems and sharper lines, which helps you adapt to your opponent’s choices in blitz.
- Your overall win rate is above 50% after adjusting for strength, indicating you’re making good decisions more often than not in fast time controls.
- Recent rating trend data indicates momentum, especially in the 3-month window, where growth is notable. This shows you’re learning from recent games and applying those lessons quickly.
- You demonstrate the ability to convert middlegame advantages into decisive results in several recent wins, showing you can press and capitalize on chances when your opponents misstep.
Areas to improve
- Endgame technique and conversion: In blitz, formalizing winning positions into clear, simple plans helps avoid last-minute surprises. Practice identifying a straightforward plan when you reach an advantageous endgame (activate rooks, simplify to a rook ending, or trap opposing weaknesses).
- Defensive clarity: In some games, turning pressures into counterplay against you can shift momentum. Focus on quick positional checks to guard against tactical shots and double-check critical captures before committing.
- Time management: Allocate your clock with a practical rhythm—spend a bit more time in the early middlegame on critical decisions, but avoid getting too locked into long calculations in blitz. Aim to keep a steady pace and leave a buffer for the late game.
- Prophylaxis and threat awareness: Practice spotting your opponent’s plans a few moves ahead. If you can anticipate common opponent ideas in your favorite openings, you’ll reduce surprise tactics and keep the initiative more consistently.
Openings to lean into (based on your performance)
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — strong results with a solid, strategic setup. Consider deepening knowledge of typical pawn structures and how to generate a kingside attack or central break from this structure.
- Scandinavian Defense — solid results and good equalizing chances. Build a clear plan for the early queen development and how to respond to typical white setups to avoid passive positions.
- Amazon Attack and other flexible systems — useful for dynamic play and keeping opponents uncomfortable. Use them when you want to steer the game into sharp, tactical lines.
Actionable idea: pick 2-3 openings with the highest win rates and study 3-4 common middlegame plans for each. This strengthens consistency across your blitz games and reduces time spent on uncertain decisions.
Structured practice plan
- Daily tactics: 15–20 minutes solving puzzles to sharpen calculation and pattern recognition, which supports quicker and safer decisions in blitz.
- Opening review: every 2–3 days, review a model game from your chosen openings (Colle System and Scandinavian as primary focus). Note typical plans, key moves, and common pitfalls.
- Endgame drills: practice rook endings and minor-piece endings from common blitz middlegames to improve conversion under time pressure.
- Time management drills: in practice games, set a rule to save at least 20–30% of your time for the endgame and use quick, repeatable checks to avoid blunders in time trouble.
Next practical steps
- Commit to 2 openings as your primary Blitz repertoire over the next 2 weeks (for example, Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation as White, and Scandinavian Defense as Black). Build a small crib sheet of typical plans and critical moves.
- In each training week, incorporate 1 targeted endgame session (rook endings or opposite-colored bishop endings) to improve conversion in practical blitz games.
- Record quick notes after games: identify one decision you would repeat differently, and practice that pattern in a short drill set.
- Review your most recent wins and losses to extract a single actionable takeaway from each game that you can apply in the next session.
Helpful resources (placeholders)
Profile link: mohamed%20anees%20m
Opening reference: Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jose Rafael Gascon | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
| Mahel Boyer | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| German Spata | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| alexboy14 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Aryan Tari | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Luka Budisavljevic | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| chara | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Isik Can | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| kingcyber19 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Rafail Antoniou | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Khatanbaatar Bazar | 10W / 11L / 4D | |
| Sanjeev Mishra | 7W / 11L / 3D | |
| jeyanth_64 | 14W / 4L / 2D | |
| Vjacheslav Weetik | 5W / 13L / 1D | |
| FarewellToKings2112 | 10W / 7L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2603 | 2775 | ||
| 2024 | 2764 | |||
| 2023 | 2601 | 2579 | ||
| 2022 | 2273 | 2571 | 2181 | |
| 2021 | 2418 | 2101 | ||
| 2020 | 2434 | 2369 | ||
| 2019 | 1738 | 2330 | 1760 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 233W / 169L / 47D | 205W / 216L / 29D | 82.8 |
| 2024 | 160W / 126L / 20D | 142W / 134L / 29D | 82.0 |
| 2023 | 252W / 170L / 30D | 227W / 181L / 40D | 81.0 |
| 2022 | 601W / 422L / 88D | 511W / 497L / 75D | 77.6 |
| 2021 | 52W / 20L / 4D | 47W / 22L / 5D | 70.3 |
| 2020 | 97W / 41L / 6D | 87W / 53L / 3D | 72.0 |
| 2019 | 76W / 36L / 12D | 78W / 33L / 9D | 73.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 191 | 99 | 74 | 18 | 51.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 147 | 64 | 68 | 15 | 43.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 145 | 69 | 63 | 13 | 47.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation | 115 | 61 | 45 | 9 | 53.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 104 | 45 | 54 | 5 | 43.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 103 | 59 | 34 | 10 | 57.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 99 | 69 | 24 | 6 | 69.7% |
| Slav Defense | 94 | 43 | 43 | 8 | 45.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 94 | 45 | 42 | 7 | 47.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 94 | 35 | 51 | 8 | 37.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 25 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Czech Defense | 23 | 8 | 14 | 1 | 34.8% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 23 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 73.9% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 15 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 33.3% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 14 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 78.6% |
| King's Indian Attack | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 12 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 41.7% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Belezky Line | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Closed, Taimanov Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |