Meet Naz: The Chessboard's Molecular Maestro
Known in the realm of 64 squares as thenazgul, Naz is a player whose chess evolution resembles the slow yet steady replication of DNA strands—complex, intriguing, and always improving. With a blitz peak rating soaring to 2186 and a daily max of 1879 during the golden years 2013-2017, Naz has cultivated a solid chess genome that thrives on both rapid-fire tactics and thoughtful daily maneuvers.
Opening Genes and Tactical Traits
Naz's opening repertoire is a genetic marvel. The Indian Game is their dominant allele, boasting a 63% win rate in blitz, while the French Defense Tarrasch Closed variation adds an 80% success rate to their tactical chromosomes. Though the Sicilian Accelerated Dragon Maroczy Bind formation appears to be a viral infection with only a 9% win rate, Naz cleverly avoids lysing their own position too often.
Playing Style: The Cellular Division of Chess
- Early resignation rate of 21.06% shows a pragmatic cell death to preserve energy for the next mitosis.
- Endgame frequency at 56.62% reveals a stamina for prolonged cellular division and strategy.
- With an average of ~62 moves per win, Naz doesn't rush the mitotic phase – they prefer a careful replication of strategy.
Psychology and Resilience
Like a cell repairing DNA damage, Naz exhibits a comeback rate of 76% after setbacks—more impressive than a mitochondrion’s power production. Naz recovers perfectly every time after losing a piece, winning 100% of such games, proving their resilience is encoded deeply within their chess mitochondria.
Notable Opponent Encounters
With a vast interaction genome, Naz has faced over a hundred unique opponents. Some show a 100% loss rate against Naz’s calculated attacks, while others remain a puzzle—like 'hichamkingmate' who managed to break the defensive membrane occasionally. Their most played opponents, like basel83 and ralph2, have offered rich evolutionary challenges, contributing to Naz’s tactical adaptability.
Fun Fact
Naz’s best performance hour is 11 AM, when the synaptic connections are presumably firing at maximum efficiency, leading to a whopping 71% win rate—talk about circadian rhythm synergy!
In summary, Naz is a chess player whose every game feels like a biological experiment—full of trials, adaptations, and evolutionary leaps. Whether blitz or daily, Naz replicates strategies with precision, occasionally mutating openings for surprise attacks, proving that on the chessboard, as in biology, survival favors the fittest moves.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| basel83 | 24W / 1L / 2D | |
| ralph2 | 14W / 10L / 2D | |
| troll29 | 7W / 3L / 2D | |
| fiscus | 5W / 3L / 2D | |
| hishamtouma | 10W / 0L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2071 | |||
| 2017 | 2069 | |||
| 2016 | 2122 | 1598 | ||
| 2015 | 2063 | 1541 | ||
| 2014 | 1911 | 1808 | ||
| 2013 | 1764 | 1798 | ||
| 2012 | 1014 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 6W / 2L / 0D | 4W / 4L / 0D | 67.2 |
| 2017 | 51W / 39L / 8D | 36W / 58L / 4D | 72.0 |
| 2016 | 26W / 10L / 1D | 33W / 21L / 2D | 64.9 |
| 2015 | 60W / 51L / 6D | 59W / 50L / 7D | 63.9 |
| 2014 | 31W / 48L / 6D | 30W / 52L / 1D | 33.0 |
| 2013 | 59W / 45L / 5D | 66W / 40L / 7D | 59.3 |
| 2012 | 26W / 14L / 0D | 26W / 17L / 1D | 47.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Undefined | 32 | 5 | 27 | 0 | 15.6% |
| Queens Pawn Opening | 18 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense Mieses Kotrc Main Line | 16 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 62.5% |
| Kings Pawn Opening | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| French Defense Exchange Variation | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| French Defense Winawer Advance Variation | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Kings Indian Defense Averbakh Variation | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Scotch Game | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense Hyperaccelerated Dragon Variation | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Game | 30 | 19 | 11 | 0 | 63.3% |
| Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack Modern Variation | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense Open Accelerated Dragon Maroczy Bind Formation | 11 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 9.1% |
| Indian Game Black Knights Tango | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense Tarrasch Closed | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack Classical Variation | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 30.0% |
| Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack Indian Variation | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense Open Accelerated Dragon Modern Variation | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| French Defense Exchange Variation | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Queens Pawn Opening Accelerated London System | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 4 |
| Losing | 35 | 0 |