Thore Perske - International Master
Meet Thore Perske, also known in chess circles as Thjop, an International Master whose chess journey is as thrilling as a rollercoaster, but with way more knights and fewer screamers. Thore’s style is a fascinating blend of patience and tactical fireworks — an artist patiently setting the board on fire, one bullet and blitz game at a time.
Chess Career Highlights
Thore's rating graph resembles a thrilling novel, climbing from the high 2300s in bullet chess all the way to a stunning peak of 2823 in November 2024. In blitz, Thore pushes the envelope even further, achieving a peak rating of 2840 — because why settle for less speed when you can blitz and dazzle?
Their playing style boasts a remarkable comeback rate of 85.55%, which means don’t count Thjop out when the game looks bleak — this player fights back like a chessboard Terminator. They also exhibit exceptional endgame prowess, with a high engagement in endgames (over 83% frequency), dishing out long, strategic battles averaging over 86 moves per win. So, it’s safe to say patience is one of their virtues, although occasional early resignations (~3%) hint they know when it’s time to cut their losses and prepare for the next tactical assault.
Opening Choices & Tactical Flair
A bit of a mystery man in opening choice, Thore often dances into the battlefield with “Unknown Opening” strategies, winning more than half of those encounters. Yet, with a chess repertoire that includes sharp dances through the French Defense, Pirc Defense, and Caro-Kann, opponents better beware — Thore can handle diversity with grace.
Recent Battles
The latest game was a nail-biter featuring the Caro-Kann Defense, where Thjop clinched a decisive checkmate after a beautifully played endgame phase. Despite occasional brutal losses—chess is a humbling sport after all—Thore maintains a remarkable psychological resilience, rarely tilting even when the chips fall against them.
Fun Facts & Personality
- Wins most often on Saturday, so if you want to catch Thore at their peak, plan chess sessions on weekends.
- Best time to challenge: 1 AM — sleep-deprived opponents beware!
- Average moves per win: 86 (this player doesn’t do quick draws, prefers a long graceful duel).
- Favorite tactic: Turning a lost position into an epic comeback (85.55% success rate!).
In summary, Thore Perske is not just a player, but a chess warrior who thrives under pressure, loves to strategize deeply, and keeps opponents on their toes with an unpredictable and effective style. Whether in bullet blitz or the calmer rapid and daily games, Thjop's mastery consistently shines — a true chess contender with stories to tell and tactics to execute. Just don’t tell Thore you’re planning a surprise; chances are they’ve anticipated it three moves ago.
Follow the games, and maybe you’ll catch some of that IM magic live!
Recent Successes
Thore, your recent rapid games show several positive aspects worth highlighting:
- Your ability to handle the Sicilian Defense Kan Variation is strong, as evidenced by your win with precise piece development and timely tactical strikes.
- You seem comfortable and confident executing active plans in the King’s Indian Defense and French Defense variations, which supports a stable positional foundation combined with strong attacking possibilities.
- You maintain good control of the center and are especially adept at pushing pawn breaks effectively to create dynamic play, which contributes to your decent strength-adjusted win rate of about 55%.
- Good endgame awareness is visible in your games, accurately converting small advantages into wins, especially in rook and minor piece endgames.
Areas for Improvement
There are key areas where focused work can elevate your game further:
- In the loss against the Sicilian Defense French Variation, some moments showed difficulty in handling counterplay and rook activity in the endgame. Strengthening your defense against active opponent pieces will help.
- Working on sharper calculation in critical moments—especially in complex middle games—can reduce mistakes and missed winning chances. Reviewing your losses in detail to spot tactical oversights will be key.
- Expanding your repertoire against openings where your win rate is lower, such as the Sicilian Alapin and Closed Ruy Lopez, could improve your overall consistency and scoring opportunities.
- Time management can be enhanced as some clocks show significant time use early in the opening; investing time in developing more automatic, yet solid, opening knowledge might free you to focus more on critical middlegame decisions during the game.
Development Recommendations
To build on your strong foundation and recent progress (including a steady 15 rating point increase over 6 months), consider the following:
- Continue analyzing your games right after playing them to reinforce good habits and recognize patterns of errors.
- Incorporate focused tactics training aimed at complex positions, to improve solving speed and accuracy.
- Study thematic endgames related to the structures you commonly reach, particularly rook endgames and positions with pawn majorities.
- Experiment with alternative move orders or sidelines in your less comfortable openings to avoid opponents’ prepared lines and increase your practical chances.
- Use your positive rating trend (with slope ~47) to boost confidence but keep pushing consistently—regular review and practice can accelerate improvement.
Keep up the great work, Thore, and continue to trust your strategic judgment and calculation! With sustained effort, your steady progress will translate into higher ratings and even stronger performances.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 28W / 23L / 1D | View Games |
| 3riksson | 29W / 7L / 8D | View Games |
| white31 | 25W / 14L / 0D | View Games |
| nuw2001 | 13W / 2L / 20D | View Games |
| cherryandmint | 9W / 18L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2589 | 2538 | 2538 | |
| 2024 | 2808 | 2787 | 2538 | |
| 2023 | 2733 | 2676 | 2523 | 1643 |
| 2022 | 2724 | 2563 | 2376 | 1764 |
| 2021 | 2721 | 2528 | ||
| 2020 | 2551 | 2645 | 2376 | |
| 2019 | 2353 | 2618 | 1747 | |
| 2018 | 2700 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 140W / 130L / 32D | 104W / 165L / 29D | 87.3 |
| 2024 | 373W / 320L / 80D | 332W / 343L / 101D | 90.0 |
| 2023 | 222W / 162L / 43D | 208W / 177L / 39D | 89.1 |
| 2022 | 49W / 27L / 24D | 51W / 35L / 17D | 74.6 |
| 2021 | 74W / 48L / 5D | 66W / 44L / 12D | 76.6 |
| 2020 | 81W / 61L / 18D | 85W / 67L / 18D | 82.8 |
| 2019 | 256W / 214L / 54D | 247W / 237L / 45D | 81.4 |
| 2018 | 225W / 157L / 54D | 225W / 164L / 54D | 88.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 250 | 117 | 101 | 32 | 46.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 239 | 132 | 88 | 19 | 55.2% |
| French Defense | 216 | 104 | 92 | 20 | 48.1% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 196 | 95 | 66 | 35 | 48.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 148 | 69 | 73 | 6 | 46.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 138 | 68 | 51 | 19 | 49.3% |
| Unknown | 129 | 53 | 63 | 13 | 41.1% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 121 | 57 | 52 | 12 | 47.1% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 114 | 58 | 39 | 17 | 50.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 112 | 53 | 43 | 16 | 47.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 51 | 27 | 20 | 4 | 52.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 36 | 18 | 17 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 30 | 14 | 13 | 3 | 46.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 22 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 45.5% |
| Modern | 19 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 57.9% |
| Czech Defense | 19 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 47.4% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 19 | 8 | 10 | 1 | 42.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 76.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 16 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 16 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 1 |