John Arni Nilssen - International Master Extraordinaire
Meet John Arni Nilssen, a chess player who has gracefully climbed the ranks to earn the prestigious title of International Master from FIDE. With a keen mind sharpened by countless battles on the 64 squares, John’s chess journey is one of steady improvement, tactical brilliance, and unwavering dedication.
Chess Progress and Style
Beginning with daily games boasting a peak rating above 2100, John soon made an impressive splash into blitz and bullet chess. His blitz rating peaked at an electrifying 2503 in 2023 — proving he’s as fast with his mind as lightning on the clock. His bullet ratings have hovered around stellar numbers, recently reaching near 2500, showing he doesn’t just think quickly, but accurately.
Known for his love of endgames (snapping up 81% frequency) and an uncanny ability to claw back from losses—often because his comeback rate is nearly 92% and he wins every time after losing a piece—John is a blend of resilience and cunning. He has a calculated patience, averaging around 77 moves to triumph, proving he doesn’t just blitz through games; he finishes them with a flourish.
Record and Rivalries
With over 6,300 blitz games under his belt, John has racked up a robust 3,222 wins, with a win rate just over 50%. In bullet chess, he’s an even fiercer competitor with a 60%+ win rate, and daily play clearly shows he means business with an almost 85% win ratio.
When it comes to opponents, John seems to have mixed feelings. Some rivals are like kryptonite (looking at you, musashi and elshadchess, who have been undefeated against him recently), while others like doublexclam and a host of loyal sparring partners enjoy a slightly less happy fate.
Personality on the Board
John’s psychological streak shows a low tilt factor of 8, meaning he hardly lets frustration get the better of him - a rare quality among those who spend hours staring at an army of pawns and knights. His “rated vs casual win difference” sits at a cool 52%, suggesting he’s far from casual—when serious, he’s downright formidable.
Off the board? Probably someone who chuckles at chess memes, drinks way too much coffee, and once tried to checkmate a squirrel in the park—because why not bring tactical genius everywhere?
Fun Facts
- Longest winning streak: 23 games – a blitz bonanza!
- Prefers to win quietly but with style: White pieces win rate at 55%, Black at a respectable 49%
- Most deadly time to play: prime hours like 21:00 with over 61% win rate – late-night brain power unleashed
John Arni Nilssen is proof that chess mastery is a journey full of blood, sweat, and deeply strategic coffee breaks. So watch out—he’s coming for your king, one brilliant move at a time.
What You're Doing Well
John, your recent blitz games demonstrate several strong qualities:
- Opening Knowledge: You are consistently playing solid openings like the Modern Defense and English Opening, which aligns well with your overall opening performance. Your ability to navigate these lines contributes to a stable start in most games.
- Positional Play: You show good understanding of piece coordination and control of key squares, such as in the games where you skillfully managed central tension and expanding pawn structures.
- Endgame Technique: Multiple wins have come from patiently improving your position and capitalizing on small advantages, as seen in your successful conversion in rook and minor piece endgames.
- Consistent Performance Over Time: Your strength-adjusted win rate of about 50% and a positive 6-month rating trend demonstrate your growing mastery in blitz chess.
Areas to Improve
To further elevate your blitz play, consider focusing on these areas:
- Handling Tactical Sharpness: In some losses, tactical oversights occurred during critical moments (e.g., the game ending after an unexpected checkmate). Regular tactics training could help sharpen your calculation and spotting of threats.
- Time Management: Some games show moves made with significantly less time than your opponent. Try to balance your clock usage better during middlegame transitions to avoid rushed decisions late in the game.
- Opening Variety and Preparation: While your main openings are reliable, diversifying can help surprise opponents. Study the weaker-performing openings like the Sicilian Closed lines where your win rate is below 43%.
- Defense under Pressure: Your losses reveal opportunities to improve resilience when under attack, specifically handling opponent's initiative in sharp Modern Defense and English Opening lines.
Practical Tips
- Incorporate daily tactical puzzles focusing on forks, pins, and discovered attacks to reduce tactical blunders.
- Practice time management with blitz and rapid games where you consciously allocate time evenly across opening, middlegame, and endgame phases.
- Analyze your recent losses by reviewing critical moments and identifying recurring mistakes, then work on specific patterns.
- Try experimenting with alternate opening lines in training games to broaden your repertoire and challenge familiar patterns.
- Use moments of advantage to simplify the position strategically rather than rushing an attack, especially in complicated endgames.
Keep Up The Good Work
Your recent performance shows an upward trend overall, with an increase of over 100 points in the last 3 months and a solid foundation in your opening choices. Stay focused on continuous learning, and your blitz results will continue to improve.
Keep harnessing your strengths and working on your weaknesses; improvement at your level is a steady process with rewarding results!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pablo_dmp | 34W / 6L / 0D | |
| cdgrzes | 18W / 1L / 4D | |
| cruz29 | 8W / 12L / 3D | |
| kristvar | 19W / 0L / 2D | |
| Slave Trajkoski | 12W / 5L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2498 | 2506 | 2035 | |
| 2024 | 2385 | 2423 | ||
| 2023 | 2112 | 2472 | ||
| 2022 | 2395 | |||
| 2021 | 2386 | |||
| 2020 | 2413 | |||
| 2019 | 2054 | 2394 | ||
| 2018 | 2170 | 2365 | ||
| 2017 | 2137 | 2188 | 2035 | |
| 2016 | 1952 | 2237 | ||
| 2015 | 2273 | |||
| 2014 | 2134 | |||
| 2013 | 1786 | 2079 | ||
| 2012 | 2170 | 2172 | ||
| 2011 | 2138 | |||
| 2010 | 1848 | 2124 | ||
| 2009 | 2065 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 38W / 19L / 9D | 41W / 24L / 6D | 83.9 |
| 2024 | 146W / 49L / 15D | 138W / 56L / 18D | 80.1 |
| 2023 | 17W / 8L / 2D | 11W / 14L / 2D | 83.9 |
| 2022 | 4W / 1L / 1D | 0W / 4L / 2D | 66.9 |
| 2021 | 5W / 3L / 1D | 0W / 6L / 2D | 71.7 |
| 2020 | 57W / 55L / 11D | 57W / 48L / 10D | 77.6 |
| 2019 | 256W / 199L / 37D | 227W / 244L / 25D | 75.4 |
| 2018 | 465W / 337L / 51D | 390W / 409L / 41D | 76.8 |
| 2017 | 309W / 233L / 28D | 278W / 265L / 35D | 75.9 |
| 2016 | 120W / 80L / 11D | 96W / 93L / 21D | 77.2 |
| 2015 | 207W / 134L / 20D | 180W / 164L / 19D | 77.9 |
| 2014 | 37W / 28L / 3D | 35W / 35L / 5D | 76.3 |
| 2013 | 223W / 176L / 29D | 218W / 180L / 34D | 79.7 |
| 2012 | 104W / 63L / 10D | 96W / 77L / 6D | 81.1 |
| 2011 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 52.0 |
| 2010 | 5W / 0L / 0D | 6W / 0L / 0D | 74.5 |
| 2009 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 65.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGD: Falkbeer, 4.d3 Nf6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 88 | 55 | 27 | 6 | 62.5% |
| Australian Defense | 59 | 39 | 18 | 2 | 66.1% |
| Czech Defense | 52 | 23 | 26 | 3 | 44.2% |
| English Opening | 48 | 29 | 16 | 3 | 60.4% |
| Modern Defense | 40 | 17 | 19 | 4 | 42.5% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 36 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 86.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 32 | 19 | 11 | 2 | 59.4% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 21 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 42.9% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 20 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 353 | 174 | 151 | 28 | 49.3% |
| Modern | 337 | 164 | 153 | 20 | 48.7% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 284 | 135 | 131 | 18 | 47.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 272 | 133 | 127 | 12 | 48.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 198 | 95 | 86 | 17 | 48.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 171 | 73 | 88 | 10 | 42.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 168 | 68 | 81 | 19 | 40.5% |
| Modern Defense | 156 | 72 | 72 | 12 | 46.1% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 149 | 75 | 67 | 7 | 50.3% |
| Czech Defense | 141 | 71 | 66 | 4 | 50.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 23 | 4 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |