Player Profile: TimGrutter03
Ever since TimGrutter03 made their debut in online chess back in 2016, they’ve showcased impressive dedication and a steady climb in skill level. Starting with a modest Blitz rating of 1370, TimGrutter03 steadily pushed boundaries and crossed into the formidable 2700+ range in later years—earning a Max Blitz rating of 2769 in 2025. Their journey spans multiple time controls, achieving notable milestones in Bullet (peaking at 2801), Daily (reaching 1820), and Rapid (maxing at 2353).
Highlights & Rating Trajectory
- Blitz: Progress from 1370 in 2016 to a Max of 2769 in 2025.
- Bullet: Moved up from 1354 in 2017 to a peak of 2801 by 2025.
- Daily: Achieved a highest mark of 1820, showing strong consistency in longer-format games.
- Rapid: Reached a top rating of 2353—proving a balanced skill across both faster and slower time controls.
Style & Approach
A remarkable characteristic of TimGrutter03’s play is a 79.77% comeback rate, indicating they rarely give up and can recover from difficult positions with ease. They also tend to steer their contests into the later stages, with 74.88% of their games heading into endgames. Despite this focus on deeper play, they maintain a relatively low early resignation rate of around 12%, illustrating their “never-say-die” mentality.
When & Where They Excel
Though they keep a balanced performance throughout the week, TimGrutter03 slightly outperforms on Saturday (56.45% win rate) and demonstrates particularly good results in the evenings. At 21:00 server time, their success rate climbs to an impressive 63%, suggesting a preference for battling late into the night.
Opening Preferences
With hundreds of games under their belt, TimGrutter03 shows a broad opening repertoire—ranging from classical lines like the Sicilian Defense to more specialized gambits and unusual setups. Notable is their ability to adapt to both 1.e4 and 1.d4 systems, scoring consistent wins in many variations while showcasing flexibility in the face of new challenges.
Conclusion
From a modest start to a consistent run of strong performances, TimGrutter03 exemplifies perseverance, a fighting spirit, and tactical flair. Whether in Bullet showdowns or methodical Daily encounters, they handle each game with determination—making them a formidable opponent who thrives in high-pressure battles and endgame challenges.
Executive summary
Your recent bullet results show solid opening ideas and good pressure in some games, but time management and endgame conversion are key areas to improve. Focusing on a small, reliable opening repertoire and streamlined decision making will help you convert more near-winning positions in fast time controls.
What you did well
- You generated active piece play and practical plans in several games, using rooks and minor pieces to create pressure on key files and weak squares.
- You showed willingness to go for tactical opportunities when the position allowed, keeping the opponent under pressure instead of shying away from complications.
- You managed to press into the endgame in a few instances, showing you can convert advantages when you maintain piece activity and avoid unnecessary simplifications.
- Your willingness to stick with your chosen openings and follow through with typical middlegame plans demonstrates discipline and a repeatable approach.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in bullet games: the 60-second per game format punishes overthinking. Practice making quick, safe decisions early and reserve deeper analysis for clearly winning lines.
- Decision making under pressure: develop a simple two-pass rule—first identify forcing moves and immediate threats, then choose the best practical continuation if the forcing line isn’t clear.
- Endgame conversion: strengthen rook-and-pawn endings and learn standard rook endgame techniques to convert advantages more reliably, rather than allowing positions to become unclear.
- Opening repertoire for speed: lock in 2–3 solid, easy-to-play openings that lead to clear middlegame plans. This reduces decision fatigue and helps you reach favorable positions faster.
- Time-stress resilience: build a routine to manage the clock, such as setting a rough per-move target, using the first few moves to develop a safe structure, and then escalating pressure when you have small advantages.
Practical drills to raise your game
- Time management drill: play 15–20 bullet games with a strict per-game time limit. After each game, note one moment where you spent too long and one move you could have played instantly with a safe, strong alternative.
- Endgame practice: study and drill rook endings with pawns, focusing on keeping rooks active and pushing passed pawns. Do 15–20 minutes of rook-endgame puzzles per week.
- Opening simplification: pick 2 openings (for example, Colle System and Hungarian Opening) and learn the typical plans and pawn structures. Practice 20–30 quick games using those lines to build familiarity.
- Post-game review habit: after each game, write a 3-point summary: (a) what went well, (b) a decision that could have been faster, (c) one concrete improvement for the next game.
Opening notes
Based on your openings performance, leaning into Colle System variants and solid flexible lines like the Hungarian Opening can be effective for bullet. These choices tend to lead to straightforward middlegame plans and quicker development, which helps in fast time controls.
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — solid structure with clear development paths.
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-beta style ideas — pragmatic and good against a wide range of replies.
Next steps / plan
- Over the next week, choose 2 openings to master for bullet and internalize their typical middlegame plans.
- Implement a strict time-management cadence: aim to spend no more than a fixed amount of time on the first 10 moves and then switch to faster, practical decisions.
- Devote 2 sessions to endgame conversion practice, focusing on rook endings and pawn structure handling.
- After each game, write a short 3-point reflection to reinforce learning and track improvements.
Profile and resources
For quick reference, see your profile summary here: Tim Grutter
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Florescu Codrut Constantin | 3W / 1L / 2D | |
| aizrawjath | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| Bu11et_Pr00f | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| chesspupil777 | 0W / 1L / 3D | |
| lagedema | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| theeshelbyy | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| lilillliliillilililillill | 1W / 3L / 0D | |
| a2-a3a7-a6 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| hemoglobinski | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| uviathqnad | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rob Schoorl | 34W / 22L / 2D | |
| Mees van Osch | 25W / 28L / 4D | |
| TheDiepvries | 29W / 2L / 2D | |
| Valentin Dragnev | 9W / 19L / 4D | |
| Jesse Zafirakos | 5W / 20L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2753 | 2740 | 2361 | 1824 |
| 2024 | 2624 | 2618 | 2353 | 1820 |
| 2023 | 2656 | 2533 | 2366 | 1663 |
| 2022 | 2504 | 2353 | ||
| 2021 | 2521 | 2263 | 2102 | |
| 2020 | 2434 | 2243 | 2142 | |
| 2019 | 2177 | 2099 | 1661 | |
| 2018 | 2105 | 2043 | 1702 | |
| 2017 | 2068 | 1942 | 1121 | |
| 2016 | 1454 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 411W / 274L / 67D | 387W / 304L / 62D | 77.8 |
| 2024 | 525W / 341L / 76D | 472W / 378L / 77D | 84.3 |
| 2023 | 299W / 223L / 33D | 281W / 244L / 34D | 73.7 |
| 2022 | 36W / 13L / 2D | 30W / 22L / 8D | 90.3 |
| 2021 | 49W / 19L / 4D | 39W / 24L / 4D | 82.1 |
| 2020 | 370W / 184L / 47D | 355W / 206L / 28D | 79.6 |
| 2019 | 112W / 40L / 8D | 103W / 55L / 14D | 68.2 |
| 2018 | 89W / 37L / 5D | 75W / 45L / 3D | 56.9 |
| 2017 | 106W / 69L / 12D | 107W / 71L / 11D | 80.6 |
| 2016 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 38.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 136 | 82 | 43 | 11 | 60.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 126 | 71 | 47 | 8 | 56.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 121 | 69 | 44 | 8 | 57.0% |
| Modern | 114 | 60 | 46 | 8 | 52.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 110 | 64 | 38 | 8 | 58.2% |
| King's Indian Attack | 85 | 45 | 34 | 6 | 52.9% |
| Czech Defense | 79 | 44 | 33 | 2 | 55.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 67 | 33 | 30 | 4 | 49.2% |
| Döry Defense | 66 | 36 | 25 | 5 | 54.5% |
| Australian Defense | 60 | 35 | 21 | 4 | 58.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 17 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 94.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 526 | 300 | 226 | 0 | 57.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 132 | 71 | 53 | 8 | 53.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 108 | 66 | 32 | 10 | 61.1% |
| Modern | 106 | 62 | 39 | 5 | 58.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 103 | 48 | 40 | 15 | 46.6% |
| Czech Defense | 94 | 52 | 30 | 12 | 55.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 88 | 57 | 27 | 4 | 64.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 80 | 48 | 25 | 7 | 60.0% |
| Döry Defense | 80 | 42 | 25 | 13 | 52.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 77 | 44 | 27 | 6 | 57.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Modern | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 0 |
| Losing | 15 | 1 |