Biography
Anatoly Moskvin (Tolyanius) is a Candidate Master (FIDE) and an energetic presence on online chess boards. Active since 2018 in public play, Tolyanius became known for marathon games, a fondness for rich endgames and a cheeky willingness to try offbeat traps just to keep opponents on their toes. He favors Rapid time control but has strong credentials across Blitz and Bullet as well.
Keywords: Anatoly Moskvin, Tolyanius, Candidate Master, chess biography, Rapid specialist, openings, endgames.
Playing style
- Deep, endgame-oriented approach — frequently reaches long, technical endings (Endgame frequency ~79%).
- Patient and persistent: average moves per win ~72, average moves per loss ~77, indicating a taste for long battles rather than quick finishes.
- Psychological edges: best time of day to play is early afternoon (around 14:00), and Tolyanius shows a respectable comeback rate after setbacks.
- Preferred time control: Rapid — the format that best showcases his calculation and endurance.
Career highlights
- Title: Candidate Master (FIDE).
- Long experience across time controls with a high volume of decisive games and sustained peak performances.
- Peak performances placeholders: 2852 (2025-09-24) and 2130 (2024-07-25).
- Visual: rating trend in his favored format — .
Openings & toolbox
Tolyanius mixes classical preparation with daring sidelines. Below are frequently employed systems and handy links to the tactical themes he returns to:
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack — a flexible flank weapon he plays often with surprising results.
- Ruy Lopez — dependable classical play when he wants slow maneuvering and progessive pressure.
- Caro-Kann Defense and French Defense — solid responses with counterpunching potential.
- Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation and Blackburne Shilling Gambit — an amusing mix of the positional and the cheeky trap.
He often experiments with the occasional gambit (Amar / Elephant themes) to unbalance opponents early.
Notable opponents & head-to-heads
Frequent rivals on the server — quick reference records (W–L–D):
- Rogelio Jr Antonio — 15–29–2
- phonySallly — 20–15–5
- Vladimir Okhotnik — 17–16–0
- Nebojsa Djordjevic — 14–17–2
- Steve Berger — 18–12–2
These regular matchups have shaped much of Tolyanius’s practical opening choices and endgame repertoire.
Sample game (playable)
Try a short illustrative game to see the style in action:
Personality & off-board notes
Tolyanius combines a researcher’s patience with a prankster’s grin: ready to explore obscure lines, but equally happy to grind in long endgames. Fans appreciate the balanced mix of entertainment and technical depth — expect both cleverly sprung traps and marathon conversion play.
Placeholder for further content and multimedia: consider adding annotated games, opening dossiers, or a visual timeline.
Quick summary
Nice run — you’re converting advantages cleanly, your rapid rating trend is strongly upward, and your repertoire contains several high‑yield lines (for example, your work with the French Defense and aggressive gambits is producing good results). The most recent win shows practical technique: you pushed a queenside pawn majority, opened files for rooks and traded into a clearly winning minor‑piece + rook endgame before finishing with a decisive capture.
What you’re doing well
- Conversion: You convert middlegame advantages into material and then into decisive tactical shots — that’s visible in the recent win where the rooks invaded and you picked off pawns until the opponent resigned.
- Tactical vision: Many wins show clean combinations and forcing sequences. Keep this up — it’s a major strength.
- Variety in openings: You get good results in many different openings (French Defense, Barnes Defense, several gambits). This makes you hard to prepare against.
- Time management in rapid: You’re not burning your clock — you keep comfortable time for the critical moments.
- Momentum & consistency: Recent rating slope and month-to-month gains show you’re improving steadily. Keep a steady training rhythm.
Key areas to improve
- Opening consistency — pick two primary systems and learn typical pawn structures and plans (you have great results in some lines but mixed results in others like the Caro‑Kann and some Sicilian/Anti‑Sicilian setups). Solidify move orders and common middlegame plans to avoid guesswork.
- Middlegame planning — sometimes you win by tactics, but a few losses indicate that long‑term positional plans (where to put knights, when to fix pawn breaks) can be improved. Focus on identifying a plan after the opening rather than only reacting tactically.
- Endgame technique — you convert well when material is decisive, but improving rook endgames and fundamental pawn‑endgame technique (Lucena, Philidor, opposition) will increase your conversion rate in closer games.
- Exploit opponent counterplay less often — when you expand on one wing (like advancing queenside pawns), double‑check the safety of your back rank and weak squares so the opponent cannot create sudden counterchances.
Game-specific notes — your most recent win
Opponent: mhartin1 — Opening: Saragossa Opening (ECO A00). Below is an interactive replay of the game so you can skim key moments quickly.
Replay (tap to open):
- Plain English takeaway: You advanced a queenside pawn to create a weakness, used rooks to open and occupy files, then traded into a simplified material‑up position and forced the opponent’s king into a vulnerable spot. Final tactic grabbed the last critical pawn.
- Small tweak: when you brought the king out early (Kxd1, Kc2) it worked fine here, but avoid unnecessary king marches unless you’re certain the center is closed and your king is safe — it can be a target in faster time controls.
Concrete next steps — 4 week plan
- Daily (15–30 minutes): 10–15 tactics with focus on forks, pins, discovered attacks and endgame tactics. Prioritize patterns that cost material in rook and minor‑piece endings.
- 3× per week (30–45 minutes): Endgame study — Lucena and Philidor techniques, basic rook vs. rook+pawn positions, king and pawn opposition. Drill the conversion methodically.
- 2× per week (30–60 minutes): Opening work — pick two systems to deepen (for example the French Defense and one aggressive gambit you like). Study typical pawn breaks, one model game per line, and common move orders to avoid transposition traps.
- Weekly (1–2 games): Play 15+10 rapid games and annotate each loss and one close win — write in plain English why you think you won or lost before checking an engine.
- Review routine: After each session, pick one theme you noticed (e.g., weak squares after queenside expansions) and make a short checklist for future games.
Practical drills & resources
- Tactics drill: set theme filters for pins, skewers and discovered attacks and do 20 problems — aim for speed + accuracy.
- Endgame drill: practice the Lucena position and the short side vs. long side rook pawn defense until you can convert/hold under time pressure.
- Opening drill: for each chosen opening, memorize 3 typical plans (one attacking plan, one defensive plan, one endgame transition plan).
- Study model games: pick 3 clean wins in your favorite opening (e.g., a classic game in the French Defense) and summarize the plan in one paragraph each.
Small checklist to use during games
- Before each move ask: “What threats does my opponent have?”
- If material is equal, prefer improving the worst‑placed piece rather than chasing pawns.
- When you exchange into an endgame, confirm a concrete winning plan (passed pawn, outside king, target weak pawn).
- When expanding on one flank (pushing a pawn majority), check back‑rank and light‑square weaknesses.
If you want — next options
- I can generate a personalized 4‑week training calendar with specific puzzles and daily sessions.
- If you upload a loss or a game that felt unclear, I’ll annotate it move‑by‑move in plain English and highlight the critical moments.
- We can focus on a targeted opening course for three weeks (pick two systems and I’ll give model lines and plans).
Final note
Great progress — your upward rating trend, strong win rate in many lines, and ability to finish games are all signs you’re on the right track. Focus on consistent opening plans and endgame technique and you’ll turn many of your good wins into routine ones. Tell me which option above you prefer and I’ll prepare the next step.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| magodelcaohs | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| llrchess | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| demanding_bear | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| ErnestoGuevaraLynch | 12W / 10L / 3D | View |
| darkness_64 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| johnniewalkerinthewarroom | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| xcgmzs7 | 5W / 2L / 1D | View |
| miyoloko | 5W / 1L / 1D | View |
| piostew | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Francesco Seresin | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 15W / 29L / 2D | View Games |
| phonysallly | 20W / 15L / 5D | View Games |
| Nebojsa Djordjevic | 14W / 17L / 2D | View Games |
| Vladimir Okhotnik | 17W / 16L / 0D | View Games |
| Steve Berger | 18W / 12L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2664 | |||
| 2025 | 2636 | 2725 | ||
| 2024 | 2646 | 2544 | 2075 | |
| 2023 | 2506 | 2052 | ||
| 2022 | 2473 | 1959 | ||
| 2021 | 1800 | 2378 | 1934 | |
| 2020 | 2222 | |||
| 2018 | 1924 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 32W / 29L / 2D | 27W / 34L / 4D | 86.2 |
| 2025 | 832W / 730L / 108D | 793W / 755L / 123D | 79.0 |
| 2024 | 1136W / 937L / 174D | 981W / 1073L / 188D | 77.9 |
| 2023 | 748W / 678L / 99D | 708W / 686L / 139D | 76.6 |
| 2022 | 399W / 319L / 54D | 340W / 377L / 57D | 73.5 |
| 2021 | 268W / 165L / 23D | 249W / 181L / 33D | 64.2 |
| 2020 | 33W / 22L / 6D | 37W / 24L / 1D | 64.2 |
| 2018 | 6W / 1L / 0D | 5W / 1L / 0D | 63.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1012 | 503 | 452 | 57 | 49.7% |
| French Defense | 650 | 327 | 284 | 39 | 50.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 641 | 337 | 256 | 48 | 52.6% |
| Ruy Lopez | 607 | 323 | 240 | 44 | 53.2% |
| Elephant Gambit | 603 | 292 | 269 | 42 | 48.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 559 | 302 | 220 | 37 | 54.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 504 | 234 | 231 | 39 | 46.4% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 417 | 238 | 157 | 22 | 57.1% |
| Benko Gambit | 392 | 186 | 171 | 35 | 47.5% |
| Modern | 383 | 168 | 182 | 33 | 43.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Czech Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Ruy Lopez | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Horwitz Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Modern | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Czech Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 4 |