Profile Summary: traht
traht is a dynamic and evolving chess competitor whose journey on the board is marked by steady progress across multiple time controls. Known for an aggressive yet resilient playing style, traht has proven a master of both rapid tactical resourcefulness and methodical endgame precision. Over the past few years, traht’s rating trajectory speaks to an ever‐improving understanding of the game; his Bullet and Blitz ratings have steadily escalated, while his Rapid performances continue to reveal a player unafraid of complex, fast–paced positions.
Beginning with formative performances in 2021 – where his Bullet rating was already challenging at 1743 and his Blitz around 1576 – traht quickly demonstrated a knack for sharp tactical encounters and quick decision–making. By 2022, his ratings climbed noticeably: with rapid formats reaching 1900 and continued strong finishes in Bullet and Blitz, his ability to adapt and overcome varied time pressures was evident.
traht’s style reflects a blend of calculated aggression with enviable resilience. He registers an impressive comeback rate of nearly 90% and, even when a piece is lost, he leverages every resource to tilt the game in his favour. An endgame aficionado with an average of roughly 77 moves in wins and losses alike, traht exhibits a thorough understanding of deep positional nuances while managing the psychological rigours of competitive play—a tilt factor kept remarkably low at only 11.
Their performance does not simply depend on opening preparation; the statistics reveal a balanced approach with a nearly even split between his White and Black results, and a disciplined early resignation rate of 1.13%, highlighting an awareness of when to cut losses. Traht’s games often evolve into intricate endgames, where his average moves per win attest to a strong strategic endurance and a keen sense for turning complex positions into victories.
Additional data paints the picture of a player who manages his energy wisely throughout the day, with peak performances during the later hours—his win rate notably peaking around 22:00. Whether engaged in the lightning pace of Bullet or the more measured rhythm of Rapid chess, traht's consistency is bolstered by a refined tactical awareness and an almost uncanny ability to stage comebacks.
In summary, traht is a chess player who exemplifies the blend of creativity, resilience, and analytical precision. His evolving ratings each year, a strategic emphasis on endgame mastery and tactical comebacks, and a psychological fortitude against tilt make him a formidable and intriguing opponent on the competitive chess scene.
Hi Evgeniy!
Great job steadily holding the 1800-plus range! Your recent streak shows you can string together strong tactical wins such as the following miniature:
What you are already doing well
- Tactical alertness. In several wins you sense the moment to break with f4/f5 or g4-g5 and convert pressure into material.
- Initiative with White. Your games against the Dragon and French Exchange show you like keeping the king in the centre, castling long and attacking on the kingside.
- Clock handling in winning positions. Almost every win ends with <30 s for the opponent and >40 s for you―good time management when you are on top.
Patterns in your recent losses
- Sicilian as Black: Four of the six recent losses start 1.e4 c5 … you entered the Taimanov, Accelerated Dragon and Wing Gambit but were out-prepared. Positions quickly became sharp and you defended passively.
- Under-estimating passed pawns. In the loss to illeerio the protected b-pawn marched all the way while your pieces were tied up.
- Pieces on the rim. In both French Exchange defeats you allowed …Nf4/…Qh4 and became the target. Watching for the opponent’s prophylaxis ideas will help.
- End-game technique. Every lost game reached a minor-piece or rook ending with material equality but worse structure. You often pushed pawns too fast (e.g. 44.b4 in the Taimanov game) creating new weaknesses.
Action plan (next 4-6 weeks)
- Patch the Sicilian repertoire. Either:
- Commit to one main line (Taimanov / Kan / Classical) and study 10 model games, or
- Switch to 1…e5; you already handle Giuoco & Ponziani well with Black.
- End-game checkpoint.
- Every session finish with 10 minutes of K+P vs K and rook endings.
- Re-play the critical endings from your losses; set the start position on a board and ask “How do I hold this?”
- Blunder-reduction routine. Before every move run a 3-step scan:
- “What did my opponent just threaten?” (Zwischenzug possibilities)
- “If I move this piece, what changes?”
- Quick back-rank & pawn-push safety check.
- Puzzle mix. 30 per day: 10 basic mates, 10 intermediate tactics, 10 end-game studies. Focus on quiet moves—they are often what you miss in defence.
- Annotate just one game per day. Mark every move with “✓”, “?”, or “?!” and write one sentence about critical moments. Quality beats quantity for learning.
Progress widgets
1982 (2024-04-15)
Mini-checklist for tournament play
- First 10 moves: follow your prep.
- Move 11-20: coordinate pieces before pawn storms.
- After each capture: ask “What changed on back rank and diagonals?”
- End-game: activate king immediately; avoid putting pawns on the color of your remaining bishop.
Keep the attacking spirit, Evgeniy, but add a layer of strategic patience. One month of targeted practice will easily push you past 1900. Good luck!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| fffffffffffy | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| smaugn_clearns | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| flaviogiraldi | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| joebadman69 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| turabek93 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mesogeiosdream | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| brainstorm_is_back | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ihaveasehmi | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mansur5510 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| westmonster | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| makariy1998 | 21W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| secretgod | 15W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| chesscnn | 8W / 5L / 1D | View Games |
| mikulamali | 5W / 6L / 3D | View Games |
| audrycastor | 6W / 6L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1746 | 1850 | ||
| 2024 | 1840 | 1743 | 1951 | |
| 2023 | 1947 | 1965 | 1941 | |
| 2022 | 1847 | 1752 | 1900 | |
| 2021 | 1743 | 1576 | 1365 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 157W / 167L / 13D | 174W / 138L / 24D | 78.9 |
| 2024 | 522W / 473L / 82D | 473W / 520L / 81D | 79.9 |
| 2023 | 741W / 699L / 146D | 711W / 741L / 129D | 82.1 |
| 2022 | 721W / 513L / 100D | 700W / 561L / 93D | 80.9 |
| 2021 | 471W / 350L / 38D | 452W / 382L / 43D | 73.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 475 | 223 | 216 | 36 | 47.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 229 | 113 | 90 | 26 | 49.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 206 | 95 | 97 | 14 | 46.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 182 | 92 | 75 | 15 | 50.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 172 | 78 | 85 | 9 | 45.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 151 | 85 | 59 | 7 | 56.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 136 | 62 | 64 | 10 | 45.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 113 | 57 | 43 | 13 | 50.4% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 107 | 51 | 46 | 10 | 47.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 107 | 52 | 46 | 9 | 48.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 733 | 366 | 321 | 46 | 49.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 474 | 248 | 197 | 29 | 52.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 354 | 184 | 135 | 35 | 52.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 340 | 167 | 142 | 31 | 49.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 236 | 107 | 111 | 18 | 45.3% |
| Czech Defense | 193 | 109 | 71 | 13 | 56.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 184 | 85 | 80 | 19 | 46.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 184 | 79 | 89 | 16 | 42.9% |
| French Defense | 164 | 87 | 69 | 8 | 53.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 160 | 80 | 69 | 11 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 27 | 13 | 14 | 0 | 48.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 19 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 68.4% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 14 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 35.7% |
| Elephant Gambit | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Czech Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Philidor Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 5 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |