Thomas Rendle (Trendle) - International Master Extraordinaire
Meet Thomas Rendle, a chess wizard who wears the title of International Master with pride — and perhaps a hint of humility, but mostly pride. Also known in the online chess world by the cunning pseudonym Trendle, Thomas has battled countless pawns, knights, and queens across some of the most intense blitz and bullet battlegrounds known to humankind (and human-computer hybrids).
Rating Rollercoaster & Statistical Sorcery
Since emerging onto the scene back in 2007, Thomas's blitz rating soared from modest beginnings to a near-legendary peak of 2789 in April 2020. But don’t call it a plateau — no, our hero is a relentless seeker of victory, bringing an impressive 64.92% win rate in blitz games and a staggering 68.83% in bullet chess, proving he’s not just fast with his fingers, but also with his brain.
He's logged thousands of games, with a total of over 2700 blitz wins and an astonishing 3450 bullet wins. If chess were a video game, Thomas would be a top-tier speedrunner with a record for "Most Consecutive Wins" (he once stormed through 33 straight victories without mercy).
Playing Style: The Tactical Magician
Famed for his laser-like tactical awareness, Thomas has an exceptional 83.83% comeback rate — yes, he turns losing positions around like a chess Houdini. His psychological stamina is noteworthy with a relatively low tilt factor of 11, meaning he’s only occasionally frustrated by the game (and then channeling it into fierce comebacks).
Endgames? He loves them — with 76.89% endgame frequency, Thomas shows that the game isn't over till the last pawn crosses the finish line. And his average moves per win (~71) suggest battles fought with patience, precision, and sometimes, just a touch of wizardry.
Victories and Laments
While no player is invincible, Thomas’s recent games reveal his knack for provoking resignations, checkmates, or time-pressure-induced defeats — a testament to his oppressive playing style. One of his most recent wins came by resignation in a French Defense Normal Variation match, showcasing his mastery of complex openings, while his losses are humble lessons in Dutch Defense Hopton Attack, reminding viewers that even masters sometimes fall victim to an unpredictable pawn push.
Off The Board
When not engulfed in deep thought over the 64 squares, Thomas presumably enjoys explaining complex chess strategies in a way that even a pawn could understand, or perhaps indulging in a chess pun or two — after all, with a username like Trendle, wit and style must be part of the package. Online opponents beware: not only is the International Master formidable, but they are known for making the chessboard a thrilling arena of fun, grit, and unyielding resolve.
Recent Performance Highlights
Thomas, your recent games demonstrate strong competitive play, particularly your victories by leveraging opening preparation and tactical awareness. You've secured several wins from challenging positions, which shows good resilience and understanding of your openings.
- Your handling of the Sicilian Defense: Closed and various French Defense lines has been especially effective, reflecting your strong theoretical knowledge and practical skills in these areas.
- You have successfully capitalized on positions to win by checkmate or opponent timeouts, indicating solid pressure maintenance throughout games.
- Continued good performance against higher-rated opponents in tournaments suggests your preparation and strategic play are paying off.
Areas for Improvement
While your win rate is impressive, and your rating trend has been positive recently, consider focusing on these aspects to push your chess further:
- Loss Analysis: Review positions from recent losses, especially where your opponent gained the advantage in the middlegame or endgame. Working to deepen your understanding of critical moments here will reduce errors.
- Drawing and Endgame Technique: While you have a solid number of draws, improving your endgame technique could convert more drawn positions into wins and avoid unnecessary draws under pressure.
- Opening Diversity: Your success with familiar openings is strong, but expanding your repertoire might surprise opponents and give you an edge in less-explored lines.
- Time Management: A number of decisive results were due to opponent timeout. Improve your speed and managing time pressure, especially in complicated positions where accuracy is critical.
Opening Insights
Examining your openings, you excel in the following:
- Sicilian Defense: Closed – Nearly 69% wins, a great foundation for sharp, counter-attacking games.
- French Defense variations – Consistent strong results in advance, classical, and exchange lines demonstrating deep knowledge.
- Barnes Defense – Perfect win record; consider integrating it further if suited to your style.
Consider exploring other defenses and middlegame plans alongside these strengths to diversify your play and keep opponents guessing.
Rating and Progress
Your rating has shown encouraging upward momentum recently, with a 60-point gain in both the last month and last three to six months, reflecting steady improvement. The positive slope in your rating trend indicates you are on the right track with training and play.
Keep focusing on:
- Studying critical game moments, especially from losses, to understand what allowed your opponents to gain the advantage.
- Maintaining consistent practice on time pressure scenarios to avoid losses on time.
- Strengthening your tactical awareness and endgame skills, which often decide close matches.
Staying consistent with these training points will help you build on your solid foundation and continue rising.
Next Steps in Your Improvement Journey
- Analyze your most challenging games, especially where you lost or drew, to identify recurring patterns or mistakes.
- Practice complex endgames and sharpen calculation skills to reduce errors in critical moments.
- Explore a few new openings or variations to enrich your opening toolkit and become less predictable.
- Work on time management by playing speed training games or setting strict time limits in practice to simulate competition pressure.
- Use tools to simulate opponent moves to reinforce tactical and strategic board vision.
You're showing great potential — regular focused work will accelerate your growth. Keep up the effort and enjoy your chess journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rvdc | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| theoch101 | 4W / 0L / 0D | |
| jamesc819 | 21W / 0L / 0D | |
| ninabjurstrom | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| luigi310312 | 22W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 87W / 81L / 5D | |
| Evan Ju | 60W / 59L / 7D | |
| Falko Bindrich | 36W / 49L / 5D | |
| Daniel Rensch | 35W / 38L / 4D | |
| humblespaceman | 56W / 12L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2760 | |||
| 2024 | 2583 | 2703 | ||
| 2023 | 2631 | |||
| 2022 | 2591 | 2673 | ||
| 2021 | 2551 | 2681 | 2274 | |
| 2020 | 2683 | 2564 | 2231 | |
| 2019 | 2635 | 2732 | ||
| 2018 | 2595 | 2607 | 2366 | |
| 2017 | 2665 | 2412 | 2360 | |
| 2016 | 2614 | 2412 | ||
| 2015 | 2493 | 2254 | ||
| 2014 | 2401 | 2319 | ||
| 2013 | 2434 | 2288 | 2039 | |
| 2012 | 2521 | 2382 | 1979 | |
| 2011 | 2815 | 2272 | 2233 | |
| 2010 | 2930 | 2146 | 2398 | |
| 2008 | 1000 | |||
| 2007 | 2235 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 50W / 11L / 5D | 42W / 20L / 3D | 70.8 |
| 2024 | 72W / 23L / 12D | 68W / 31L / 6D | 76.9 |
| 2023 | 117W / 26L / 9D | 114W / 27L / 8D | 65.6 |
| 2022 | 71W / 31L / 6D | 68W / 23L / 14D | 79.2 |
| 2021 | 128W / 42L / 17D | 116W / 56L / 15D | 75.7 |
| 2020 | 117W / 28L / 7D | 101W / 36L / 17D | 75.3 |
| 2019 | 63W / 29L / 12D | 52W / 41L / 11D | 81.4 |
| 2018 | 70W / 34L / 14D | 62W / 49L / 11D | 82.5 |
| 2017 | 216W / 102L / 21D | 181W / 119L / 24D | 79.8 |
| 2016 | 344W / 129L / 33D | 335W / 139L / 34D | 76.1 |
| 2015 | 147W / 30L / 7D | 130W / 49L / 8D | 74.0 |
| 2014 | 193W / 82L / 15D | 186W / 82L / 14D | 74.0 |
| 2013 | 952W / 346L / 61D | 931W / 366L / 84D | 77.6 |
| 2012 | 513W / 266L / 49D | 528W / 240L / 40D | 79.6 |
| 2011 | 66W / 26L / 7D | 70W / 18L / 9D | 45.2 |
| 2010 | 226W / 61L / 26D | 217W / 60L / 26D | 71.9 |
| 2008 | 0W / 4L / 3D | 2W / 7L / 2D | 48.1 |
| 2007 | 13W / 0L / 0D | 11W / 1L / 4D | 53.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 222 | 143 | 63 | 16 | 64.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 173 | 99 | 57 | 17 | 57.2% |
| Dutch Defense | 159 | 89 | 57 | 13 | 56.0% |
| French Defense | 151 | 107 | 35 | 9 | 70.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 143 | 107 | 29 | 7 | 74.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 139 | 103 | 28 | 8 | 74.1% |
| French Defense: Guimard Variation, Thunderbunny Variation | 132 | 81 | 39 | 12 | 61.4% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 103 | 72 | 24 | 7 | 69.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 99 | 66 | 28 | 5 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 97 | 64 | 26 | 7 | 66.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 296 | 211 | 70 | 15 | 71.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 237 | 152 | 74 | 11 | 64.1% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 216 | 139 | 67 | 10 | 64.3% |
| Dutch Defense | 196 | 151 | 33 | 12 | 77.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 191 | 122 | 65 | 4 | 63.9% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 181 | 128 | 40 | 13 | 70.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 175 | 121 | 46 | 8 | 69.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 163 | 111 | 46 | 6 | 68.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 161 | 105 | 53 | 3 | 65.2% |
| Modern | 131 | 94 | 32 | 5 | 71.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 16 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 43.8% |
| French Defense: Guimard Variation, Thunderbunny Variation | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 71.4% |
| French Defense | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 28.6% |
| Dutch Defense | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 51 | 35 | 10 | 6 | 68.6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 87.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 20 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 16 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 16 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 81.2% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 13 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 33 | 14 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |