Chess Player Profile: Mr. Smith
Meet Mr. Smith, a blitz virtuoso who’s been snarling through the ranks since 2012 with a rating trajectory that reads like a thriller novel. Starting out as a humble 1086 on the blitz battlefield, he ascended the ratings ladder with such perseverance that by 2025, he proudly held a peak blitz rating of 2323. Talk about leveling up like a chess boss!
While Mr. Smith’s bullet rating might not have soared to the dizzying heights of his blitz, it still skyrocketed from a modest 1049 in 2019 to an impressive 2116 by 2025. Those are moves so fast, they’d make a caffeine-fueled squirrel jealous.
Playing Style
Known for his endurance and tactical awareness, Mr. Smith likes to stretch his games out, winning with an average of around 71 moves and only bowing out after about 72 moves when the pain of defeat arrives. His endgame expertise is strong—he hits the endgame in about 80% of his matches, proving that patience really is a virtue on the 64 squares.
He’s also the ultimate comeback king, boasting a near-perfect 88% rate of bouncing back after setbacks, and a 100% win rate after losing a piece. Opponents beware: if you take something dear from him, expect a fierce counterattack!
Signature Openings
Mr. Smith’s opening repertoire is a colorful mosaic of chess strategery. The Owens Defense is his favored territory with 3822 blitz games, hitting close to a 44% win rate—a battlefield where he's both aggressive and crafty. He also fans the flames with solid showings in the French Defense Steiner Variation, where nearly half the time his plans come to fruition.
In bullet, he’s a true pyromaniac with the Queens Pawn Opening English Defense, winning a blazing 85% of his 13 games—suggesting that if you blink, you might just miss his lightning moves.
Recent Battles
Just recently, sporting the username TrentAA, Mr. Smith secured a dramatic victory by resignation in a tense game against zivb, showcasing tactical precision in the Sicilian Defense Bowdler Attack. His strategic finesse and unwavering focus led to a triumphant end after a grueling 57 moves of chess warfare. Another recent conquest involved the Scandinavian Defense, where his patient pressure forced yet another opponent to concede.
Of course, no warrior wins all battles. His latest losses came in tightly fought matches involving the Owens Defense and Sicilian Defense, confirming that Mr. Smith is as human as the rest of us—even if his win streaks—up to 14 games in a row—sometimes make us mortals question reality.
Opponent Dynamics
Mr. Smith has tangled the most with opponents like nasa957 and kantemir-08, maintaining a respectable relationship of wins and losses. His psychological resilience shines through his modest tilt factor of 14, meaning that while frustration might knock on the door, it rarely steps inside. Mondays through Sundays, with slightly better performance on weekends and evenings, Mr. Smith proves he's always a contender no matter the clock.
In Summary
Whether he’s pacing the blitz battlefield, dazzling in bullet, or grinding out those marathon endgames, Mr. Smith is a chess journeyman with a spark of genius and a dash of tenacity. A blend of steady climbing, tactical resilience, and a touch of humor make him a beloved figure on any chessboard—where every pawn march may lead to a king’s downfall, and every game promises an adventure.
Key takeaways from your recent blitz results
You have shown an overall upward trend over the past year, with a solid six‑month gain and a positive 12‑month slope. In the last month you dipped a bit, dropping about twenty points, which is common in blitz when the pace and complexity spike. The data suggests you are generally improving in the longer term, but a short‑term wobble happened recently. The openings you’ve used show you handle some dynamic lines well (notably the Bird Opening) but there are also defenses that have been tougher for you to navigate in fast time controls. The plan is to consolidate your strengths and tighten the gaps that show up in the blitz format.
What you did well
- You maintain active piece play and look for practical chances even in sharp positions. This helps you keep the fight going in blitz where calm, slow maneuvering is risky.
- You’ve found a few promising openings where you generate initiative, especially with lines related to the Bird Opening, which shows you can steer the game toward dynamic middlegames.
- Long‑term momentum is positive. A multi‑month rise and a strong yearly trend indicate that your fundamentals (calculation, pattern recognition, and practical decisions) are improving.
- Willingness to complicate positions when you’re ahead or when your opponent is under pressure can pay off in blitz, keeping your opponent uncomfortable and off their preferred rhythm.
Areas to improve
- King safety and defending against sudden tactical breakthroughs. In a couple of the recent decisive games, quick attacks on the king side or central files overwhelmed you. Build a quick “safety check” routine for the first 10 moves of a sharp game.
- Time management. Blitz rewards clear plans and fast verification of threats. Practice setting a mental time budget for each phase (opening, middlegame, endgame) and sticking to it unless a forcing move appears.
- Endgame conversion. When you reach simplified positions, focus on concrete plans to convert advantages (or force draws) rather than chasing material without a clear objective.
- Pattern recognition in common blitz traps. Some losses stemmed from routine tactical motifs. Strengthen your quick recognition of forks, pins, skewers, and back‑rank motifs with focused puzzles.
Opening and pattern guidance for the next phase
- Bird Opening has shown above‑average results for you. Consider expanding it as a reliable weapon in blitz to keep opponents unsure and to practice flexible middlegame plans.
- Balance your repertoire between aggressive and solid responses. For e4 players you’ve faced, having a plan against common Sicilian structures (like the Bowdler/early queenside play) and a solid setup against the French/Caro‑Kann can help you avoid getting into chaotic positions you’re not prepared to navigate quickly.
- Study short, practical middlegame plans that arise from your most effective openings. Know the typical pawn structures and piece placements you want to aim for in those lines, so you can decide your plan in a few moves rather than guessing under time pressure.
Structured 4‑week improvement plan
- Daily tactical focus (15–20 minutes): target motifs like forks, pins, discovered attacks, and back‑rank ideas. Use a mix of 3‑ and 5‑minute puzzles to build speed and accuracy.
- 2 blitz review sessions per week (before/after a blitz session, 20–30 minutes each): replay your losses and draws, identify recurring mistakes, and write down one concrete correction for each bad habit you find.
- Endgame practice (2 sessions per week, 20 minutes): rook endings, simple knight vs. bishop endings, and converting a small material edge. Keep a few go‑to endgame techniques ready for blitz.
- Opening refinement (1 session per week, 30 minutes): reinforce your Bird Opening lines and develop a reliable plan against at least two common defenses you’ve faced most often.
- Time‑management drills during practice games: set a strict “check threats” timer (e.g., pause if you’re spending more than a minute on one move in the critical early phase); practice making safe, simple developing moves when under clock pressure.
Personal notes and next steps
Your long‑term progress is positive, and you’ve shown the ability to press in the right positions. To reduce the recent dip, focus on fast, reliable patterns and a consistent plan for the first 12 moves in your main blitz lines. Build a small, repeatable post‑game review habit: note the moment you felt unsure, why you hesitated, and the one concrete adjustment for the next game.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| alek_0047 | 5W / 11L / 1D | |
| nachoneymar11 | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| moonwalkercat900 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| kotishca | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| blitzenemy | 1W / 3L / 1D | |
| micgamer | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| laufer6460 | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| juliusgladiator | 9W / 8L / 0D | |
| finansistmar | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| mrflexaa | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| nasa957 | 30W / 62L / 3D | |
| kantemir-08 | 22W / 51L / 6D | |
| profcalculus | 28W / 48L / 2D | |
| Cornel U | 27W / 33L / 2D | |
| Cseke Ricsi | 27W / 29L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2077 | 2299 | ||
| 2024 | 2036 | 2183 | ||
| 2023 | 2115 | |||
| 2022 | 1786 | 2204 | ||
| 2021 | 1800 | 2174 | ||
| 2020 | 2138 | |||
| 2019 | 1357 | 2004 | ||
| 2018 | 1972 | |||
| 2017 | 2057 | |||
| 2016 | 1960 | |||
| 2015 | 1808 | |||
| 2014 | 1776 | |||
| 2013 | 1772 | |||
| 2012 | 1727 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 460W / 485L / 49D | 417W / 537L / 40D | 77.3 |
| 2024 | 324W / 378L / 42D | 309W / 396L / 42D | 77.1 |
| 2023 | 376W / 446L / 29D | 360W / 467L / 36D | 77.0 |
| 2022 | 349W / 402L / 30D | 329W / 430L / 28D | 74.6 |
| 2021 | 394W / 458L / 41D | 403W / 463L / 41D | 75.9 |
| 2020 | 444W / 505L / 25D | 433W / 515L / 26D | 74.6 |
| 2019 | 399W / 511L / 36D | 435W / 488L / 46D | 73.1 |
| 2018 | 404W / 454L / 24D | 363W / 490L / 30D | 71.5 |
| 2017 | 483W / 560L / 38D | 457W / 568L / 36D | 71.7 |
| 2016 | 416W / 326L / 19D | 385W / 372L / 21D | 68.4 |
| 2015 | 345W / 265L / 19D | 331W / 285L / 18D | 70.2 |
| 2014 | 157W / 139L / 11D | 146W / 156L / 6D | 69.4 |
| 2013 | 160W / 180L / 14D | 188W / 150L / 15D | 70.5 |
| 2012 | 63W / 54L / 2D | 53W / 60L / 5D | 73.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 4189 | 1840 | 2184 | 165 | 43.9% |
| Australian Defense | 3447 | 1562 | 1751 | 134 | 45.3% |
| French Defense | 2021 | 954 | 989 | 78 | 47.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1957 | 878 | 1011 | 68 | 44.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1416 | 646 | 720 | 50 | 45.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 698 | 341 | 328 | 29 | 48.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 547 | 240 | 285 | 22 | 43.9% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 501 | 268 | 219 | 14 | 53.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 463 | 181 | 271 | 11 | 39.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 406 | 186 | 206 | 14 | 45.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 35 | 23 | 11 | 1 | 65.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 34 | 20 | 14 | 0 | 58.8% |
| Australian Defense | 24 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Czech Defense | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |