Biography
Nadya Toncheva is a FIDE Master celebrated for fearless, fast-paced chess and a quick wit at the board. A seasoned competitor across Blitz, Rapid, and Daily events, she blends sharp tactical sense with inventive openings and a love of the game that shines under pressure.
Her journey spans online tournaments and club play, where she built a reputation for creative thinking, resilience, and a readiness to take bold ideas to the heart of the action.
Titles and Recognition
Nadya earned the FIDE Master title from FIDE, marking her as a strong and respected competitor on the international stage. Her crown jewel is Blitz, where her rapid calculation and dynamic play consistently turn tight moments into memorable achievements.
Playing Style and Openings
Known for an adventurous opening mindset, Nadya often steers opponents into unfamiliar lines, especially when the clock is ticking in Blitz. Her repertoire includes Aggressive setups from the Amar Gambit family and Sicilian paths such as the Alapin Variation, tailored to keep opponents off balance and questions unanswered.
- Amar Gambit in fast games
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation and related aggressive ideas
- Flexible, initiative-driven play with a willingness to embrace risk when needed
Notable Moments
From dramatic time-pressure comebacks to sharp tactical sequences, Nadya’s games underscore a passion for the game and a playful mindset that keeps her opponents guessing—and entertained.
Profile
See Nadya Toncheva’s profile for more details: nadya-toncheva
What stands out in your blitz play
You demonstrate a willingness to fight for initiative and create complications, which can put opponents under pressure in fast games. When you activate your pieces and keep your king safe, you generate practical chances and can seize the moment to complicate in the opponent’s time trouble. Your opening choices show you’re comfortable with dynamic lines, and you often convert into favorable middlegames or tactical chances when you find the right rhythm.
Key strengths you can build on
- Active piece play and willingness to press in the early middlegame.
- Solid results in the Sicilian family and related aggressive lines, suggesting good preparation in those openings.
- Resilience in complex positions; you can turn pressure into winning chances when you maintain piece activity.
Areas to improve (actionable)
- Blunder prevention in tactics: in sharp middlegame swings, pause to verify critical captures or sacrifices. A quick 1–2 second reevaluation can avoid one-sided losses.
- Opening depth and consistency: deepen your understanding of your main openings to reduce surprise responses from opponents. Create concise notes with 2–3 typical middlegame plans per line and common counter ideas to watch for.
- Endgame readiness: practice rook and pawn endings and king activity in drawn or simplified positions to increase conversion rates in blitz.
- Time management: establish a steady pace in the first 15–20 moves and reserve a small time cushion for the critical moments to avoid heavy time pressure later.
Opening performance guidance
Your data shows solid results in the Sicilian Defense and related lines (including the Alapin variation and Amar Gambit). To capitalize on this strength, continue refining those lines and develop a clear, repeatable middlegame plan for each. Also consider adding one flexible, non-Sicilian weapon to diversify your arsenal and reduce predictability. Quick steps:
- Maintain 2–3 core ideas for each top opening and practice them in training games until you can execute them under time pressure.
- Prepare a short checklist for these lines before blitz sessions (e.g., typical pawn breaks, key piece placements, and typical tactical motifs your opponent might try).
Practice plan (next 4 weeks)
- Week 1: Tactics drill every day (15–20 minutes). Focus on recognizing forks, discovered attacks, and quiet threats in blitz positions.
- Week 2: Endgame basics. Practice rook endings and king activity in 5–10 accessible positions; aim for converting small advantages into wins.
- Week 3: Opening refinement. Build concise 1–2 page cheat sheets for your top 2–3 openings, including common replies and middlegame plans.
- Week 4: Practical play with focused review. Play 4 training games where you implement the planned middlegame ideas from your openings and review each game briefly afterward to identify one improvement per game.
Quick post-game routine (optional)
- After each blitz game, note the moment you felt time pressure and whether it affected your decision quality.
- Identify at least one tactical moment you missed or overpressed in the middlegame, and review that position with a quick engine-free analysis later.
- Assess whether your endgame plan matched the position and whether simplifying would have increased your chances of a win or a draw.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| roberz12 | 162W / 162L / 109D | View Games |
| LudiRadovan | 84W / 183L / 26D | View Games |
| nissou-ach | 92W / 114L / 39D | View Games |
| Ivan Kochiev | 81W / 120L / 17D | View Games |
| ginogochev | 132W / 39L / 38D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2469 | 2670 | 1766 | |
| 2024 | 2469 | 2584 | 1802 | |
| 2023 | 1816 | 2526 | 1766 | 1809 |
| 2022 | 2505 | 2535 | 1605 | |
| 2021 | 2423 | 1766 | 1675 | |
| 2020 | 2266 | 2322 | 1766 | 1856 |
| 2019 | 2062 | 2277 | 1662 | 1832 |
| 2018 | 1884 | 1843 | 1662 | 1798 |
| 2017 | 1696 | 2014 | 1594 | 1762 |
| 2016 | 1797 | 1818 | 1790 | 1427 |
| 2015 | 1776 | 1948 | 1820 | 1390 |
| 2014 | 1273 | 1445 | 1526 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 91W / 75L / 29D | 92W / 80L / 28D | 93.3 |
| 2024 | 230W / 194L / 39D | 229W / 187L / 39D | 91.2 |
| 2023 | 257W / 246L / 80D | 242W / 257L / 86D | 85.9 |
| 2022 | 205W / 207L / 40D | 228W / 208L / 25D | 84.7 |
| 2021 | 153W / 169L / 27D | 137W / 182L / 25D | 81.0 |
| 2020 | 284W / 286L / 46D | 264W / 325L / 35D | 71.7 |
| 2019 | 352W / 412L / 54D | 349W / 431L / 49D | 62.0 |
| 2018 | 800W / 969L / 59D | 770W / 998L / 43D | 29.5 |
| 2017 | 187W / 121L / 30D | 162W / 146L / 35D | 80.7 |
| 2016 | 96W / 67L / 26D | 97W / 74L / 23D | 70.4 |
| 2015 | 105W / 38L / 6D | 94W / 38L / 5D | 76.5 |
| 2014 | 22W / 17L / 4D | 20W / 18L / 1D | 74.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2905 | 1055 | 1838 | 12 | 36.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 459 | 235 | 172 | 52 | 51.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 235 | 118 | 82 | 35 | 50.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 216 | 84 | 107 | 25 | 38.9% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 194 | 93 | 84 | 17 | 47.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 192 | 86 | 86 | 20 | 44.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 176 | 97 | 67 | 12 | 55.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 165 | 80 | 73 | 12 | 48.5% |
| QGA: 4.e3 a6 | 146 | 71 | 62 | 13 | 48.6% |
| Australian Defense | 137 | 68 | 53 | 16 | 49.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 19 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 68.4% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 33.3% |
| French Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| QGA: 3.Nf3 Bg4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 110 | 64 | 37 | 9 | 58.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 61 | 23 | 30 | 8 | 37.7% |
| French Defense | 42 | 24 | 18 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 41 | 22 | 16 | 3 | 53.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 39 | 21 | 14 | 4 | 53.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 38 | 17 | 17 | 4 | 44.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 37 | 12 | 24 | 1 | 32.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 32 | 18 | 13 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Czech Defense | 32 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 46.9% |
| Australian Defense | 30 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 53.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 26 | 15 | 9 | 2 | 57.7% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 25 | 15 | 7 | 3 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 20 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 55.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 18 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 72.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 17 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 35.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 16 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Australian Defense | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 15 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 46.7% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 53.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 0 |
| Losing | 34 | 0 |