Meet User234564
Since their first Blitz games in 2018—starting around a modest 800 rating—this player has steadily climbed the ranks with an unrelenting passion for chess. Their dedication to the competitive format is clear: by 2022, they had peaked at a remarkable 2770 in Blitz, while also achieving a lofty 2919 Bullet rating in 2021 and showing strong growth in Rapid ratings, reaching as high as 2719 in 2023.
In total Blitz encounters alone, User234564 has contested over two thousand games, amassing notable win records across formats. Their style emphasizes resilience—showcased by a Comeback Rate above 90%—and a knack for reaching endgames in nearly 80% of matches. Often more successful playing White (49.53% win rate) than Black, they still maintain a fighting spirit no matter the color, frequently recovering from lost pieces to seal victory.
Along the way, User234564 has enjoyed a longest winning streak of 19 games and often finds peak performance later in the day, with 7 p.m. emerging as an especially favorable time. They can be prone to the occasional tilt phase (Tilt Factor of 11), but they rarely give up early (Early Resignation Rate around 1.28%), proving they remain dangerous competitors even under pressure.
With consistent results against a broad spectrum of opponents, User234564’s challenging, never-say-die approach makes them a formidable presence on the board. Their willingness to battle through lengthy matches—often spanning close to 80 moves—reveals a thoughtful, tenacious competitor ready to test strength in every phase of the game.
Overall Progress and Trends
Ruslan, your current rating and performances show a sophisticated understanding of chess, especially given your history of climbing from a modest starting rating to competing successfully against high-rated players. However, recent results indicate a slight decline in your rating over the past 3 to 6 months, despite a positive short-term trend in the last month. This suggests some fluctuation in form and consistency, which is normal at high levels as competition stiffens.
Your strength-adjusted win rate hovering around 50.5% confirms that you hold your own against strong opponents but also face challenges maintaining a stable upward trajectory.
Game Analysis and Tactical Feedback
Reviewing your most recent blitz games reveals several important points:
- Time Management: In games decided on time, we see opportunities to better balance your calculation speed with accuracy. Quick decisions are key in blitz, but think of managing incremental gains in time, such as spending slightly more time on critical moves to avoid blunders.
- Opening Play: You comfortably navigate complex openings like the King's Indian Defense and the Caro-Kann. Your choice of lines with rich middlegame dynamics suits your strengths. However, paying closer attention to opponent move subtleties in these openings could improve your early position advantage or defensive resources.
- Endgame Technique: Some recent losses stem from endgame scenarios where precise calculation and positional understanding are crucial. Practicing endgame drills regularly can enhance your ability to convert advantageous positions and defend hard ones.
- Blunder Reduction: Under time pressure, some tactical oversights have cost you material and initiative. Incorporate tactics training focused on common motifs in your favorite openings to sharpen pattern recognition.
Opening Strengths & Improvements
Your performance data across openings highlights particular success and areas to cultivate:
- Strengths: Your strongest win rates appear in the Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack and King’s Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, indicating your preparation and understanding in these lines pay dividends.
- Improvement Areas: The Sicilian Defense (especially Najdorf Variation) and Scandinavian Defense have lower win rates, under 45%. These are complex and heavily analyzed openings, so enhancing your theoretical knowledge and exploring updated lines could raise your results.
- Balanced Approach: Continue utilizing your solid repertoires such as Caro-Kann and Slav Defense, which have competitive win rates around 50-56%. Deepening your plans within these will solidify your middle-game expertise.
Practical Recommendations Moving Forward
- Focus on Consistency: Given minor rating drops in medium term, work on minimizing unnecessary losses in equal or better positions. Review recent defeats to spot recurrent mistakes.
- Time Pressure Drills: Since several games ended on time, practice playing with slightly less time to improve your speed and decision-making.
- Endgame Mastery: Commit to systematic endgame study, especially rook and pawn endgames which frequently appear in your games.
- Tactical Training: Integrate daily puzzles that emphasize your opening structures and typical tactical patterns encountered.
- Opening Theory Updates: Regularly update your knowledge in your primary openings to counter novel ideas and maintain an edge.
- Post-Game Analysis: Analyze your games deeply, including critical moments near time trouble, to enrich your positional insight and avoid tactical shots.
Encouragement
Your progress to a rating above 2600 demonstrates extraordinary dedication and skill. With focused improvement in time management, selective opening deepening, and endgame refinement, you can reverse recent rating trends and continue climbing. Stay confident and keep enjoying your chess journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Harold Wanyama | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Viktor Parfenov | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chessvntroll | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Eduardo Barbosa Mesquita | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Volen Dyulgerov | 6W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Reza Mahdavi | 2W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Ekaterini Pavlidou | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| yuxiliang | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Mike Sailer | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Ivan Vihor Krsnik Cohar | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| erik20000 | 9W / 12L / 18D | View Games |
| denissautchenkov | 27W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| emil1541 | 19W / 3L / 7D | View Games |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 12W / 14L / 2D | View Games |
| Vjacheslav Weetik | 7W / 12L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2843 | 2755 | ||
| 2024 | 2648 | 2600 | ||
| 2023 | 2625 | 1650 | ||
| 2022 | 2648 | 2692 | ||
| 2021 | 2739 | 2591 | 2350 | |
| 2020 | 2520 | 2570 | ||
| 2019 | 1721 | |||
| 2018 | 1653 | 1476 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 101W / 91L / 14D | 114W / 80L / 19D | 88.7 |
| 2024 | 49W / 28L / 6D | 40W / 34L / 6D | 88.0 |
| 2023 | 91W / 74L / 19D | 76W / 80L / 28D | 70.1 |
| 2022 | 197W / 184L / 38D | 161W / 231L / 26D | 85.0 |
| 2021 | 312W / 273L / 60D | 277W / 321L / 52D | 83.7 |
| 2020 | 183W / 112L / 22D | 154W / 121L / 29D | 75.6 |
| 2019 | 6W / 0L / 0D | 4W / 2L / 0D | 52.7 |
| 2018 | 15W / 8L / 0D | 20W / 8L / 1D | 45.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 198 | 86 | 97 | 15 | 43.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 142 | 52 | 77 | 13 | 36.6% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 108 | 59 | 41 | 8 | 54.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 104 | 59 | 37 | 8 | 56.7% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 89 | 50 | 30 | 9 | 56.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 84 | 37 | 44 | 3 | 44.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 83 | 38 | 36 | 9 | 45.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 80 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 50.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 70 | 35 | 30 | 5 | 50.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 69 | 32 | 30 | 7 | 46.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 38 | 24 | 11 | 3 | 63.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 20 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 17 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 88.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Modern | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Australian Defense | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 22.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fegatello Attack, Leonhardt Variation | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Berlin Wall | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Belezky Line | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |