Róbert Torma - International Master
Meet Róbert Torma, a formidable chess warrior widely known by his username vizafogo. Holding the title of International Master from FIDE, Róbert has been carving his path in the chess world with a blend of tactical brilliance and, occasionally, a sly grin when opponents wonder what just happened on the board.
His blitz rating has skyrocketed to a peak of 2706 in May 2025, a testament to his lightning-fast calculations and uncanny ability to create opportunities even in chaotic positions. Róbert’s blitz record features over six thousand wins, proving he’s not just a flash in the pan but a consistent force. With a current winning streak that might make his rivals sweat, he's a player who thrives on dynamic and fast play.
Róbert’s style is one for the ages: patient in the endgame (with a delightful 72% endgame frequency), tricky in tactics (an impressive 87.5% comeback rate!), and sometimes surprising with early resignations (a modest 2.88% - hey, even the best know when to fold). This is a player who knows how to grind a win, averaging over 75 moves in victories, showing that giving up is rarely on his agenda.
His opening book is nothing short of eclectic but effective. Róbert has a 54.35% win rate in his signature "Top Secret" openings in blitz, and he's equally comfortable with the Caro-Kann (perfect 100% win rate in 5 blitz games!), and a sneaky delight with the Sicilian Defense Delayed Alapin Variation. Opponents are often left guessing what surprise he'll spring next.
Off the board, Róbert’s chess persona shines through in his most recent games. Not one to shy away from a duel, his latest victory was a swift but methodical take-down on Chess.com, showcasing his knack for squeezing the juice out of even the tiniest positional advantage before delivering the final blow.
Whether it’s blitz, rapid, or daily chess, Róbert Torma remains a player to watch. Flashy yet thoughtful, fast-paced yet strategic, he’s the kind of competitor who can both dazzle and humble you, sometimes all within the same game.
Keep an eye on vizafogo – the board’s not safe when he’s in the game!
What went well in your recent blitz games
You showed good willingness to seize the initiative and keep pressure on your opponents in middlegames. Your piece activity and readiness to complicate the position helped you generate chances even in sharp lines.
- Active and flexible piece placement that kept your opponent reacting rather than implementing their plan.
- Solid opening feel in several games, with comfort in dynamic setups such as Scandinavian and Dutch-related ideas, which align with your blitz style.
- Ability to convert advantages into a win in the recent slate of games, demonstrating you can press when the initiative is yours and close out efficiently.
Areas to improve
- Time management in complex middlegames: aim to keep at least a small cushion on the clock in critical moments to avoid rushed, uncertain decisions.
- Endgame technique: practice common rook-and-pawn endings and other simple endgames so you can convert advantages more reliably and avoid stalemates or perpetual checks under time pressure.
- Calculation discipline: in tactical melees, prioritize forcing moves and verify threats from your opponent before committing to long sequences; this helps prevent overextension.
- Opening preparation: deepen familiarity with your go-to lines (especially the Scandinavian and Dutch families) so you can move faster and reduce early positional risk in blitz.
Opening patterns that fit your blitz style
Your openings data suggest you perform well in Scandinavian Defense and Dutch Defense, with solid win rates across those families. Consider leaning into these more in blitz to build speed and confidence, while continuing to refine your handling of other lines like the Colle and Queen's Gambit Accepted variants you encounter.
Practice plan for the next weeks
- Daily: 15-minute tactic sessions focusing on common blitz motifs (forks, pins, skewers, discovered attacks).
- Twice weekly: 5+0 or 3+2 blitz with a chosen high-performing opening; review each game briefly to identify one improvement point.
- Endgames: two short rook-endgame drills per week to build comfort under time constraints.
- Post-game reviews: after each blitz session, note one recurring mistake and one successful tactic to guide future practice.
Quick references
Consider using the openings you perform well with as anchors for your blitz repertoire, and integrate targeted drills around the patterns you encounter most often.
%3Copponentusername%3E🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chesspunctum | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| chesstrucker77 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Warre De Waele | 1W / 1L / 2D | View |
| classic_turtle | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Narek Ghimoyan | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Julius Muckle | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| bigmantyrone | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Zoran Stojcevski | 11W / 5L / 0D | View |
| Siar Yaran | 5W / 5L / 1D | View |
| garudapura | 7W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Florescu Codrut Constantin | 31W / 23L / 9D | View Games |
| Darko Jelen | 26W / 9L / 5D | View Games |
| Jaroslaw Krassowizkij | 13W / 10L / 6D | View Games |
| Nebojsa Djordjevic | 17W / 8L / 4D | View Games |
| Sanjeev Mishra | 18W / 9L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2681 | 2596 | ||
| 2024 | 2609 | 2489 | ||
| 2023 | 2645 | 2339 | ||
| 2022 | 2610 | 2402 | ||
| 2021 | 2505 | 2375 | 2462 | |
| 2020 | 2550 | 2132 | 2501 | |
| 2019 | 2481 | |||
| 2018 | 2397 | 2398 | ||
| 2017 | 2187 | 2303 | 2104 | |
| 2016 | 2186 | 2358 | 2221 | |
| 2015 | 2213 | 2264 | ||
| 2014 | 2292 | 2369 | ||
| 2013 | 2323 | 1862 | 2394 | |
| 2012 | 2341 | 1918 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 595W / 366L / 94D | 551W / 397L / 96D | 70.0 |
| 2024 | 166W / 81L / 26D | 154W / 87L / 31D | 73.7 |
| 2023 | 4W / 2L / 0D | 5W / 2L / 0D | 64.5 |
| 2022 | 404W / 249L / 76D | 390W / 259L / 79D | 71.9 |
| 2021 | 592W / 368L / 140D | 564W / 407L / 117D | 70.9 |
| 2020 | 542W / 360L / 106D | 537W / 383L / 116D | 71.2 |
| 2019 | 251W / 168L / 47D | 237W / 182L / 43D | 71.2 |
| 2018 | 140W / 74L / 15D | 112W / 96L / 21D | 67.7 |
| 2017 | 261W / 177L / 32D | 242W / 207L / 34D | 67.3 |
| 2016 | 245W / 148L / 43D | 233W / 165L / 38D | 74.4 |
| 2015 | 39W / 26L / 7D | 41W / 31L / 4D | 74.5 |
| 2014 | 82W / 41L / 7D | 90W / 39L / 9D | 73.4 |
| 2013 | 296W / 109L / 27D | 270W / 118L / 36D | 75.4 |
| 2012 | 109W / 34L / 10D | 110W / 35L / 10D | 78.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 655 | 384 | 225 | 46 | 58.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 449 | 171 | 266 | 12 | 38.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 412 | 221 | 147 | 44 | 53.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 410 | 223 | 146 | 41 | 54.4% |
| Dutch Defense | 407 | 241 | 134 | 32 | 59.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 387 | 217 | 131 | 39 | 56.1% |
| Australian Defense | 385 | 173 | 178 | 34 | 44.9% |
| Czech Defense | 340 | 181 | 124 | 35 | 53.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 295 | 143 | 110 | 42 | 48.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 279 | 137 | 123 | 19 | 49.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 19 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 68.4% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| French Defense: Guimard Variation, Thunderbunny Variation | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense: Classical Variation | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Döry Defense | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 34 | 23 | 6 | 5 | 67.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 29 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 75.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation | 28 | 22 | 2 | 4 | 78.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 24 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 79.2% |
| Dutch Defense | 22 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 77.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 22 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 77.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 21 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 19 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 79.0% |
| Czech Defense | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| English Opening | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Neo-Gruenfeld, 6.O-O c6 7.b3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 2 |
| Losing | 21 | 0 |