Sergey Eliseev
FIDE Master & Board Tactician Extraordinaire
Sergey Eliseev, known in chess circles simply as VM2027, is a formidable FIDE Master with a flair for the fast-paced chaos of Bullet chess and the adrenaline rush of Blitz. With a career trajectory that looks more like a rocket launch than a steady climb, Sergey’s Bullet rating skyrocketed from a humble 1682 in 2020 to an astounding peak of 2689 by 2025. If kings and queens quiver, it’s probably because Sergey’s on the hunt!
What truly sets Sergey apart is tactical wizardry: when life (or chess) takes a piece away, Sergey turns tragedy into triumph with a 99.62% win rate after losing a piece — basically a Houdini of the 64 squares. His comeback rate in battles stands impressively at 90.05%, ensuring that he never goes down without a fight (and often wins in the process).
When Sergey isn’t orchestrating brilliant comebacks, he’s a strategic endgame specialist, with a penchant for endings that last on average 80 moves—enough time to make even the most patient spectator yawn and cheer simultaneously. His games tend to be marathon affairs, averaging 84 moves per win, proving that he’s in chess for the long haul.
Despite his impressive stats, Sergey has a mischievous tilt factor of 12, reminding us that even masters can have their "oops, I just blundered my queen" moments. Interestingly, he shines brightest late at night, boasting some of his highest win rates during early morning hours—say hello to the nocturnal grandmaster!
Playing Style & Personality
- Win rates: 51.26% with White, 47.59% with Black.
- Early Resignation Rate: A humble 2.23%, because giving up isn't in his dictionary.
- Endgame Frequency: Engages deeply in endgames 80.5% of the time — patience is a virtue!
- Most recent opponents: Faces a cast of characters from “masked-dolphin” to “imbahimovic.”
Behind the serious numbers lies a player with a penchant for keeping his openings “Top Secret” — or at least that’s what the stats jokingly suggest. Sergey’s battlefield is unpredictable, and he relishes the mystery his opponents face at the start.
With a longest winning streak of 12 games, Sergey has demonstrated he can dance through fire and come out unscathed. Whether you meet him on the virtual board at 3 AM or during a weekend blitz frenzy, remember you’re up against a master who plays like a chess ninja — patience, precision, and probably a cup of strong coffee.
Follow Sergey Eliseev for a mix of tactical fireworks and late-night strategic duels that could make even Magnus pause to reconsider!
Overview for Sergey Eliseev – blitz development focus
You’ve shown resilience in blitz and can generate practical chances even from tricky openings. There’s a mix of solid results and some tough losses where sharp tactical moments swung the game. The goal now is to tighten your opening decisions, sharpen your quick calculation, and improve conversion in the middlegame and endgame under time pressure.
What you’re doing well
- You handle a dynamic, aggressive style well and look to seize initiative in the middlegame when the position allows it.
- Your opening choices indicate you’re comfortable with a range of solid systems and can steer games toward active, fight-ready middlegames rather than passive holds.
- You perform reasonably well across several standard openings, showing you can adapt to different pawn structures and plan ideas without getting routed in the early phase.
Recent game patterns and improvement areas
- In at least one recent loss, the king’s side and back-rank safety became a concern as the middlegame opened up. In blitz, it’s easy for sharp tactical moments to decide the game; focus on quick safety checks after every few moves to avoid hidden threats.
- Situations where you gain space and activity but miss clarity in the follow-up can invite counterplay. Work on concrete middlegame plans after you reach a practical pawn structure, so moves have a clear purpose rather than chasing activity for its own sake.
- Time pressure can make accurate calculation harder. If you sense you’re entering time trouble, shift toward simpler plans you know well rather than complex, unfamiliar sequences.
Openings and repertoire guidance
Your data shows solid results with several common openings, particularly the general Sicilian family and the Caro-Kann variations. To reduce decision fatigue in blitz, consider narrowing to a compact, reliable repertoire you can execute quickly and confidently:
- Pick two lines you understand deeply for Black against 1.e4 (for example, a straightforward, solid setup and a more dynamic counterplay line) and two lines against 1.d4 (a solid, strategic system and a flexible, tactical option).
- Prefer openings that lead to clear middlegame plans and practical endgames, reducing the need to memorize long theoretical lines in fast time.
- For example, a steady Caro-Kann or a principled Sicilian approach can offer good balance between safety and chances, while avoiding overly theoretical branches that are risky in blitz.
Practice plan and drills
- Daily blitz prep: 15 minutes of targeted tactics puzzles (focus on patterns that commonly appear in your preferred openings and in typical blitz blunder traps).
- Endgame awareness: 10 minutes of rook-and-pawn or minor-piece endings to improve conversion and survival when the clock is tight.
- Post-game review: after each session, spend 10-15 minutes analyzing one win and one loss with an eye on one concrete improvement (for example, a missed tactic, a poor plan after the opening, or a back-rank weakness).
- Time management drill: practice a rule like “consolidate the position by move 20 in a typical game” or “allocate a fixed portion of time to the opening phase” to reduce time trouble in the later phase.
Time management and blitz habits
- Develop a simple in-game routine: scan critical tactical threats every 4-5 moves, then decide on a plan for the next 8-12 moves before spending more time on calculations.
- Aim to reach a comfortable middlegame position with a clear plan within the first 15-20 moves, preserving 5-10 minutes for the endgame or accurate finishing blows.
- When ahead in time, avoid overcomplicating positions; steer toward straightforward plans that convert advantages without forcing risky lines.
Next steps and actionable goals
- Choose 2-3 openings to rely on in blitz and study their typical middlegame plans, not just the move orders.
- In your next 5-7 blitz sessions, keep a small “one improvement per game” log: note one tactical alert, one new pattern learned, and one endgame technique to practice.
- Schedule a focused post-game review window (around 15 minutes) to identify and fix the single biggest mistake that occurred in your last set of games.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pekowitsch | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| playfaster260 | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| shantia-s | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| krishsna | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| i_love_steak12 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| loopliyixin | 1W / 1L / 1D | |
| noc2 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| mikechesser | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| deepak20002 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| ryadad1 | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Peder Aamodt | 71W / 65L / 14D | |
| veryprivateaccount | 44W / 72L / 32D | |
| Valery Popov | 6W / 40L / 5D | |
| Shazil Shehzad | 10W / 19L / 1D | |
| jimmyjoy23 | 7W / 9L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2587 | 2494 | ||
| 2024 | 2359 | 2307 | ||
| 2023 | 2316 | 2228 | 1845 | |
| 2022 | 2011 | 1835 | ||
| 2021 | 1975 | 1821 | ||
| 2020 | 1916 | 1779 | 2185 | |
| 2019 | 1823 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 635W / 512L / 93D | 582W / 575L / 83D | 87.3 |
| 2024 | 328W / 270L / 51D | 300W / 294L / 54D | 85.0 |
| 2023 | 488W / 356L / 60D | 458W / 397L / 63D | 83.4 |
| 2022 | 6W / 4L / 0D | 5W / 2L / 0D | 70.2 |
| 2021 | 2W / 11L / 0D | 6W / 8L / 1D | 60.0 |
| 2020 | 8W / 21L / 6D | 11W / 24L / 2D | 70.1 |
| 2019 | 48W / 36L / 1D | 53W / 27L / 1D | 64.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 247 | 120 | 110 | 17 | 48.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 196 | 105 | 74 | 17 | 53.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 129 | 63 | 63 | 3 | 48.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 101 | 39 | 56 | 6 | 38.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 92 | 49 | 41 | 2 | 53.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 91 | 43 | 39 | 9 | 47.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 76 | 48 | 22 | 6 | 63.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 75 | 36 | 30 | 9 | 48.0% |
| Döry Defense | 69 | 41 | 22 | 6 | 59.4% |
| Modern | 68 | 34 | 29 | 5 | 50.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 173 | 66 | 93 | 14 | 38.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 142 | 83 | 50 | 9 | 58.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 116 | 59 | 46 | 11 | 50.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 107 | 55 | 45 | 7 | 51.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 106 | 52 | 45 | 9 | 49.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 99 | 50 | 41 | 8 | 50.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 90 | 50 | 36 | 4 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 86 | 40 | 37 | 9 | 46.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 75 | 32 | 40 | 3 | 42.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 64 | 37 | 23 | 4 | 57.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 3 |