Alexandra Afanasieva - Woman FIDE Master
Meet Alexandra Afanasieva, a chess aficionado whose blitz skills have been lighting up the virtual boards since 2020. With the coveted title of Woman FIDE Master tucked under her belt, Alexandra doesn’t just play chess—she strategizes and dazzles.
A Rating Rollercoaster
Starting off with a blitz rating around 2100 in 2020, Alexandra has shown a consistent upward trend, hitting an impressive peak of 2609 in 2024! Her bullet and rapid games tell a similar story, with rapid reaching just over 2100, proving that she’s no one-trick pony. Be it lightning-fast bullet or methodical rapid, Alexandra balances speed and precision like a true maestro.
Playing Style & Strengths
With an average game length over 70 moves for both wins and losses, Alexandra is evidently one who loves to play the endgame dance, showing her fondness for deep strategy and tactical patience. She boasts a whopping 99.64% win rate after losing a piece, demonstrating uncanny resilience and tactical wizardry (it’s almost like losing a piece just fires her up!).
Psychologically, she’s got a tilt factor of 9, meaning she might get a little annoyed after blunders but bounces back with a comeback rate of 87.32%—because giving up is just not in her vocabulary. When it comes to playing with white pieces, she maintains a slight edge with a 50.26% win rate. Not bad for someone who keeps the opponents guessing!
Head-to-Head Highlights
Alexandra has faced a myriad of opponents, some of whom have discovered just how tough a match she can be. Her record against frequent rival nikita_stein is impressive, winning over 80% of their games, while others have found her fortress nearly impregnable. Some opponents may have left scratching their heads, but Alexandra’s win rate continues to climb.
Fun Facts
- Longest winning streak? A solid 14 games—talk about momentum!
- Likes to play blitz at midnight? Her win rate at 0:00 hours peaks at an astonishing 70%.
- Never one to resign early, early resignation rate stays low at 1.57%.
All in all, Alexandra Afanasieva is a formidable force on the chessboard—part tactician, part fighter, and all heart. Whether she’s setting traps or dodging checkmates, one thing’s for sure: her games are always an adventure, and her opponents? Well, they better bring their A-game.
Alexandra, here is some tailored feedback based on your recent games.
Quick snapshot
- Peak blitz rating so far: 2636 (2024-04-30).
- Typical activity: •
What you are doing well
- Solid Black Repertoire. Your Queen’s Indian (…Ba6, …c5) and Caro-Kann structures show good strategic understanding. The win against MikeWizard illustrates how comfortably you handle minority-style pawn play and piece coordination.
- Practical Gambit Handling. As White you are happy to enter the Goring (vs. bssjdm) or grab space with the advanced French structures. You often obtain the initiative quickly.
- Nerve in Complicated Positions. You rarely shy away from unclear sacrificial lines (e.g. …Qxh3+ followed by …Qxg2# in the accelerated Panov). This courage wins you many miniatures.
Main improvement themes
1 Concrete calculation vs. “hope chess”
Several losses share a moment where a single tactic refutes an otherwise reasonable plan:
- Your piece activity looked promising, but pawns on both wings became loose. Missing
27.Ra7allowed White to seize the seventh rank and win by force. - Drill: 10 minutes/day of “Calculate till quiet” exercises. Force yourself to verbalize the candidate → forcing line → evaluation routine on every move that changes the position (captures, checks, threats).
2 Dark-square weaknesses after flank pawn pushes
In several Sicilians (loss to LittleCube) and the Modern defence game vs. Dodouo you advanced h– or g–pawns early, inviting …Qd7–h3 or …gxf5 ideas.
- Before pushing a wing pawn, run the “dark-square checklist”: Who controls g3/e3/c3/f3? What is the worst square my opponent’s queen or bishop can reach after the push?
- Study model games by Kramnik in the Catalan/Queen’s Indian where he contains dark-square holes with patient manoeuvres.
3 Time management
Even with a 1-second increment you often reach critical positions on 0 :05 – 0 :15 (e.g. the final conversion in your win vs. MikeWizard).
Rule of thumb: spend ≤ 20 % of your clock in the opening, 50 % in the middlegame crisis, reserve 30 % for the endgame.
4 White repertoire depth
The 1.e4 d3 / 1.e4 g3 setups keep you flexible but sometimes concede the centre without concrete pressure. Consider adding one mainstream weapon so you can “turn up the heat” against strong opposition:
- Open Sicilian with 3.d4 if you enjoy tactics.
- Italian Game (Giuoco Pianissimo) for a strategic fight with familiar structures.
Action plan for the next four weeks
| Day | Task |
|---|---|
| Mon / Wed / Fri | 30 tactics on Chess.com rated ≥ 2400, annotate 5 you miss. |
| Tue | Play two 10 | 5 games focusing on clock discipline. Review without engine first. |
| Thu | Study one annotated model game in your chosen new White opening. |
| Weekend | Analyse one of your losses in depth; upload for feedback or compare with engine only after your own notes. |
Players & resources worth revisiting
- Positional mastery in similar structures: Kramnik (Queen’s Indian), Ulf Andersson (Caro-Kann endgames).
- Tactical alertness: look at finishes by ShazilTheGOAT2006—the game you lost is a ready-made puzzle set.
- Concept glossary: review Zwischenzug and Deflection motifs; they appear in many of your critical moments.
Keep playing ambitious chess, but marry it with a bit more calculation discipline and time control, and your next rating jump will follow soon. Good luck, and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| nikita_stein | 13W / 1L / 2D | |
| aboba123vivian | 10W / 1L / 1D | |
| ssstttyyyuuu | 7W / 0L / 0D | |
| dankestamy | 6W / 0L / 0D | |
| gorbunov_gleb | 5W / 1L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2603 | 2077 | ||
| 2024 | 2137 | 2609 | 2080 | |
| 2023 | 2209 | 2324 | 2054 | |
| 2022 | 2291 | 1608 | ||
| 2021 | 2302 | 2208 | 1821 | |
| 2020 | 2248 | 2096 | 1816 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4W / 4L / 0D | 5W / 4L / 0D | 66.8 |
| 2024 | 102W / 79L / 16D | 89W / 93L / 17D | 79.4 |
| 2023 | 219W / 185L / 22D | 185W / 200L / 30D | 74.9 |
| 2022 | 65W / 37L / 9D | 56W / 37L / 8D | 72.0 |
| 2021 | 129W / 141L / 13D | 131W / 122L / 21D | 76.4 |
| 2020 | 56W / 58L / 5D | 55W / 62L / 4D | 73.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 84 | 46 | 36 | 2 | 54.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 71 | 34 | 33 | 4 | 47.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 59 | 19 | 33 | 7 | 32.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 47 | 22 | 23 | 2 | 46.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 43 | 19 | 22 | 2 | 44.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 41 | 16 | 22 | 3 | 39.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 38 | 15 | 20 | 3 | 39.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 33 | 14 | 16 | 3 | 42.4% |
| Döry Defense | 33 | 18 | 11 | 4 | 54.5% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 31 | 14 | 14 | 3 | 45.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 53 | 28 | 23 | 2 | 52.8% |
| Center Game | 41 | 15 | 23 | 3 | 36.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 36 | 19 | 16 | 1 | 52.8% |
| Australian Defense | 33 | 19 | 13 | 1 | 57.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 30 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 22 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Scotch Game | 20 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 65.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 80.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 53.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 76.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 60 | 30 | 28 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 19 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 57.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 19 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 36.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 15 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 46.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 15 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 53.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 41.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Australian Defense | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Czech Defense | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 44.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 1 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |