Yan Liu - The Grandmaster Behind the Wandering Knight
Also known in the chess realm as WanderingKnightLY, Yan Liu proudly carries the prestigious title of Grandmaster from FIDE, a badge of honor earned through countless battles across the checkered battlefield.
Chess Journey and Style
Starting from humble blitz ratings of around 1100 in early 2017, Yan Liu's trajectory is nothing short of meteoric. Rapidly climbing the ranks with intense focus and a dash of wizardry, Yan smashed through ratings barriers, peaking at an astonishing 2944 in blitz by early 2025.
Whether wielding the white or black pieces, Yan maintains an aggressive yet calculating approach, boasting a white win rate near 63% and a respectable 53% with black. Notably, Yan favors deep, strategic play, averaging about 75 moves per victory, showing a penchant for long, grueling endgames rather than quick finishes.
Signature Openings
“Top Secret” aptly describes Yan’s preferred opening repertoire in blitz, where nearly 1,700 games have been played under this enigmatic banner with a commendable win rate of 58.5%. When Yan does reveal their cards, they occasionally dabble in the Sicilian Defense Najdorf variations and Bogo Indian Defense, with secret weapons keeping opponents guessing.
Competitive Highlights and Psychological Edge
Yan’s record speaks volumes: over 980 wins in blitz with a positive win-loss ratio, paired with a remarkable 81.8% comeback rate after setbacks. Clearly, this grandmaster doesn't throw in the towel easily, turning lost positions into triumphs like a reverse magician.
The best time to challenge Yan? Around 5 PM, when their win rate hits a perfect 100% (perhaps fueled by a well-timed cup of coffee or the mysterious powers of the evening sun).
Noteworthy Battles
Among the latest evidence of Yan’s tactical prowess are swift victories over opponents with ratings exceeding 2900, including a dramatic win by resignation after squeezing out positional advantages in well-known Sicilian lines.
Fun Fact
Despite an aggressive playing style, Yan’s early resignation rate is low (under 3%), proving they’re stubborn enough to fight until the last pawn drops—or at least until their opponent blinks first.
In Brief
Yan Liu is not just a chess player. They're a tireless strategist, a relentless fighter, and a “Wandering Knight” who gracefully navigates the battlefield of 64 squares, proving with every game that even the mightiest chess conquests start from a single, well-placed pawn.
Hi Yan! 👍 Overall Impression
You are a very dynamic player who is comfortable in double–edged Sicilian and Indian-type positions. Your games show an excellent feel for piece activity and tactical motifs. When you are ahead on the board and on the clock you convert convincingly.
What You Already Do Well
- Active opening choices. In your two most recent wins (vs. Neferpitou27 and upbeat028) you steered the game into rich Sicilian and Bogo-Indian structures and outplayed strong 2700–3000 opponents.
- Piece coordination in sharp positions. Notice how the
…Nb6 → …Nc4
manoeuvre in your Najdorf game simultaneously hit the queen and weakened the c-file—excellent visualisation. - Killer instinct once the initiative is yours. Moves such as
38…Rd1+,40…Nd1+and the final passed-pawn race show confidence in calculation under pressure.
Recurring Issues
-
Time management (the biggest single leak).
• Three of your five recent losses were pure time-outs despite roughly equal or even favourable positions (e.g. vs. Seochesspie, move 97!).
• Entering chronic Zeitnot forces you to rely on “hope-chess” and lets winning positions slip. -
King safety after early pawn storms.
• In both Adams-Attack Najdorfs you answeredh3 / g4with …h6 and …g6, creating dark-square holes. You survived once, but the loss (19-May) shows how fragile the structure becomes.
• Similar over-extension happened in the Classical Nimzo where …h5 was played without completing development. -
Converting technical endgames when low on time.
• Rook & pawn endgame vs. Seochesspie was objectively winning; the engine shows a +8 evaluation at move 76, yet you flagged. The underlying skill gap is not technique but method: creating a simple winning plan quickly.
Action Plan for the Next Month
-
Fix the clock first.
• Add a 1-second increment to all training games.
• Use the “stop-thinking” rule: if nothing critical is happening and you have used 50 % of your starting time, make a safe move and bank time for later complications. -
Targeted opening repair.
• Prepare a low-maintenance line against 6.h3 and 6.g4 Najdorf (e.g. the modern …e6 setup) so you don’t have to reinvent the wheel OTB.
• In the King’s Indian Fianchetto you lost after 14.e4; revisit the Kavalek-Bronstein line with the idea …Be6, …Qd7, …Bh3 to avoid an over-extended queenside. -
Endgame speed drills.
• Spend 10 minutes daily onrook & pawn vs. rook
side-files; aim to mate/queen in <45 seconds.
• Use the “three-checkpoints” heuristic (king activity, passed pawn, cut-off) to simplify practical decision-making. -
Post-game routine upgrade.
After each session pick one critical moment and write a 2-sentence summary: “I played X, engine says Y because ___.” This micro-review builds pattern memory without overwhelming you.
Quick Reference
• Your peak ratings so far: Blitz 2947 (2025-09-16), Rapid 2832 (2020-08-21) (keep aiming!).
• Most recent instructive win:
Next Coaching Session Prep
Please bring one annotated Najdorf game where you felt lost in the opening
and one endgame you failed to convert under time pressure. We will build a personalised warm-up routine around those examples.
Keep up the fighting spirit! —Coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| WFAFAF | 135W / 42L / 34D | |
| bluesunsetn | 90W / 59L / 10D | |
| ddwinning | 59W / 30L / 32D | |
| sandglassn | 60W / 25L / 10D | |
| German Bazeev | 16W / 3L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2947 | |||
| 2024 | 2938 | |||
| 2023 | 2459 | |||
| 2022 | 2801 | 2488 | ||
| 2021 | 2620 | 2808 | 2488 | |
| 2020 | 2262 | 2891 | 2488 | |
| 2019 | 2247 | 2810 | ||
| 2018 | 1827 | 2575 | ||
| 2017 | 1763 | 2575 | 1000 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11W / 7L / 5D | 13W / 7L / 4D | 95.5 |
| 2024 | 17W / 1L / 2D | 16W / 2L / 2D | 85.6 |
| 2023 | 0W / 0L / 2D | 1W / 1L / 1D | 78.4 |
| 2022 | 11W / 3L / 3D | 7W / 7L / 1D | 83.3 |
| 2021 | 69W / 43L / 16D | 49W / 51L / 26D | 81.9 |
| 2020 | 108W / 65L / 22D | 96W / 82L / 25D | 78.7 |
| 2019 | 160W / 63L / 18D | 128W / 75L / 26D | 79.4 |
| 2018 | 37W / 19L / 3D | 27W / 25L / 6D | 67.2 |
| 2017 | 167W / 46L / 22D | 150W / 63L / 22D | 77.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 72 | 42 | 22 | 8 | 58.3% |
| Döry Defense | 67 | 43 | 18 | 6 | 64.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 66 | 43 | 18 | 5 | 65.2% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 54 | 37 | 14 | 3 | 68.5% |
| King's Indian Attack | 47 | 25 | 18 | 4 | 53.2% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 46 | 27 | 13 | 6 | 58.7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 30 | 10 | 1 | 73.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 39 | 25 | 13 | 1 | 64.1% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 37 | 23 | 9 | 5 | 62.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 36 | 21 | 10 | 5 | 58.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Indian Defense: Schnepper Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Semi-Tarrasch, 5.e3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Delayed Fianchetto | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Paulsen Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Döry Defense | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 1 |
| Losing | 7 | 0 |