Vilka Sipilä - International Master Extraordinaire
Vilka Sipilä, also known by the elusive moniker wannabe2700, has carved a remarkable niche in the chess world as an International Master, a prestigious title awarded by FIDE. Known for their strategic brilliance and a penchant for thrilling comebacks, Vilka is a fierce competitor across all time controls: blitz, bullet, rapid, and daily chess.
Chess Odyssey
Starting from a humble 1200 daily rating in 2009, Vilka demonstrated an impressive climb, peaking at a blitz rating of 2806 and a bullet rating nearing 2700 by 2025. Their blitz performance is nothing short of phenomenal, boasting a win rate of over 57% in a staggering 5,892 games played with their go-to “Top Secret” opening (well, it truly is top secret!). Rapid and bullet formats are no strangers to their strategic prowess either, with rapid games winning 75% of the time and bullet games nearly 62% wins.
Style and Substance
Vilka is the kind of player who doesn’t just play the game but dances with it. With an average of 72 moves per win and an endgame frequency over 80%, they savor the long fights — proving patience is a virtue even in blitz chess. The psychological resilience is legendary: their comeback rate sits near 86%, and after losing a piece, they win an astonishing 99.83% of the time. Clearly, giving up early is not in Vilka's playbook, with an early resignation rate of just 2.2%.
Records and Rivals
Vilka has recorded monumental streaks, including a jaw-dropping 41-game winning streak. Opponents beware: their win rate across various adversaries ranges widely, with total dominance against some and a spirited challenge against others. They excel most on Thursdays and early mornings, the “magical hours” where their winning percentages soar up to nearly 75%!
A Humorous Touch
While many choose to rest after a few losses, Vilka seems to thrive on pressure — their tilt factor is modest at 22, but their ability to turn tables is uncanny. It’s tough to tell if they’re just stubbornly stubborn or a genius with nerves of steel. Either way, their opponents often find themselves caught in a blitz tempest, wondering how they blinked and suddenly lost their queen!
Whether outwitting opponents with secret openings or outlasting foes in epic endgames, Vilka Sipilä’s journey is a testament to dedication, resilience, and a dash of mischievous chess wizardry. One thing’s for sure: if you ever play them, be ready for a battle that might just last well beyond your bedtime.
Positive Highlights from Recent Bullet Games
Vilka, your recent games show several strengths that are crucial in bullet chess:
- Strong Opening Preparation: You consistently use aggressive and dynamic openings such as the Reti Opening and Nimzo-Larsen Attack, which suit your fast-paced style well and often give you early initiative.
- Effective Tactical Awareness: Notable sacrifices early in the game to gain tempo and attack, such as knight sacrifices targeting the opponent's king, highlight your keen tactical vision.
- Good Use of Tempo and Initiative: The sequence of moves where you put constant pressure on your opponent’s king position and force weaknesses demonstrates sharp timing and activity.
- Endgame Technique: You demonstrate solid technique in converting advantages, like advancing passed pawns and coordinating pieces harmoniously to deliver checkmate or force resignation.
- Fast Decision-Making: Your time management is impressive, consistently making quality moves quickly which is essential in bullet format.
Areas for Improvement
Despite your strengths, there are several areas where refinement could enhance your bullet performance:
- Time Pressure Management: Recent games show losses and even some wins on opponent’s time rather than clear position wins, indicating moments when your time management can be tightened especially in complex middlegames.
- Handling Opponent Counterplay: In some losses, opponents were able to generate strong counter-attacks particularly involving central and kingside pawns pushing forward. Improving defensive techniques and prophylaxis can help resist these.
- Precision Under Pressure: Mix of small inaccuracies in critical moments allows opponents to equalize or gain winning chances. Focusing on key position evaluation and move safety can mitigate these issues.
- Opening Variety and Flexibility: While some openings show excellent success, others such as the Czech Defense show a lower win rate. Broadening your repertoire or adjusting lines that yield weaker results might increase consistency.
- Drawing Technique: Draws are rare in your record, which is often good, but enhancing endgame knowledge to convert some equal positions or force draws prudently could prevent unnecessary losses.
Strategic Suggestions
- Time Usage: Practice balancing speed and accuracy; spend a tiny bit more time on critical moves without sacrificing overall speed to reduce tactical oversights.
- Opening Review: Focus review on lines with lower win percentages and study alternatives or typical plans to improve performance, especially for defenses where you struggle.
- Training Endgames: Sharpen fundamentals in crucial pawn and rook endgames or simplified material positions common in bullet games.
- Mental Reset Between Games: Since bullet is intense and fast, brief relaxation or deep breaths after each game can help maintain focus and sharpness across sessions.
- Analyze Losses Thoroughly: Continue carefully reviewing losses as you did with recent notable games to understand what went wrong and how to adjust.
Your strength adjusted win rate above 51% indicates very solid performance at a high level. With targeted improvements in time control and tactical precision, you can further consolidate your rating and enjoy more consistent success in bullet chess.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Elizaveta Malakhova | 15W / 12L / 0D | |
| Tomi Nyback | 11W / 13L / 3D | |
| Nihal Sarin | 3W / 22L / 0D | |
| Bicha Rraco | 17W / 7L / 0D | |
| caraguru | 16W / 5L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2660 | 2638 | ||
| 2024 | 2661 | 2631 | 2276 | 2201 |
| 2023 | 2674 | 2630 | 2298 | 2155 |
| 2022 | 2603 | 2717 | 2328 | 2147 |
| 2021 | 2519 | 2762 | 2093 | |
| 2020 | 2526 | 2692 | 2163 | 2143 |
| 2019 | 2438 | 2800 | 2064 | 2012 |
| 2018 | 2596 | 2531 | 994 | |
| 2017 | 2475 | 2420 | ||
| 2016 | 2239 | 2300 | ||
| 2014 | 2258 | 2256 | ||
| 2013 | 2264 | |||
| 2012 | 2156 | 2331 | ||
| 2011 | 2210 | |||
| 2010 | 2078 | 1900 | ||
| 2009 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 45W / 36L / 3D | 33W / 44L / 5D | 74.5 |
| 2024 | 107W / 86L / 12D | 121W / 75L / 10D | 75.9 |
| 2023 | 111W / 71L / 13D | 101W / 85L / 13D | 81.7 |
| 2022 | 292W / 83L / 11D | 274W / 107L / 17D | 73.8 |
| 2021 | 136W / 87L / 24D | 155W / 90L / 15D | 85.4 |
| 2020 | 479W / 254L / 47D | 446W / 259L / 61D | 80.7 |
| 2019 | 573W / 322L / 39D | 538W / 329L / 66D | 82.4 |
| 2018 | 422W / 212L / 31D | 365W / 255L / 37D | 82.8 |
| 2017 | 122W / 83L / 6D | 107W / 96L / 6D | 69.9 |
| 2016 | 5W / 3L / 1D | 4W / 5L / 0D | 85.6 |
| 2014 | 11W / 7L / 0D | 11W / 8L / 0D | 81.2 |
| 2013 | 53W / 32L / 0D | 51W / 32L / 3D | 73.7 |
| 2012 | 91W / 51L / 2D | 93W / 51L / 0D | 80.4 |
| 2011 | 10W / 2L / 1D | 9W / 4L / 1D | 83.5 |
| 2010 | 8W / 1L / 0D | 9W / 1L / 0D | 63.6 |
| 2009 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 24.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 821 | 476 | 300 | 45 | 58.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 258 | 154 | 95 | 9 | 59.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 191 | 108 | 69 | 14 | 56.5% |
| Dutch Defense | 176 | 77 | 89 | 10 | 43.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 140 | 90 | 45 | 5 | 64.3% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 133 | 81 | 43 | 9 | 60.9% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 133 | 77 | 49 | 7 | 57.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 116 | 72 | 37 | 7 | 62.1% |
| French Defense | 106 | 54 | 46 | 6 | 50.9% |
| Alekhine Defense | 104 | 67 | 32 | 5 | 64.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 192 | 123 | 66 | 3 | 64.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 170 | 119 | 45 | 6 | 70.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 124 | 71 | 50 | 3 | 57.3% |
| Alekhine Defense | 105 | 59 | 40 | 6 | 56.2% |
| Czech Defense | 59 | 24 | 34 | 1 | 40.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 54 | 28 | 26 | 0 | 51.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 50 | 30 | 16 | 4 | 60.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 44 | 24 | 19 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Döry Defense | 36 | 22 | 13 | 1 | 61.1% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 30 | 22 | 8 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 41 | 34 | 6 | 1 | 82.9% |
| Dutch Defense | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Czech Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 87 | 65 | 15 | 7 | 74.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 95.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 19 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 94.7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 68.8% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 16 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 56.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 73.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Belezky Line | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 41 | 0 |
| Losing | 22 | 2 |