Was-that-right

Meet Was-that-right: The Chessboard Chameleon

Was-that-right is no ordinary chess player; they are a fascinating specimen in the vast ecosystem of online chess enthusiasts. From the bustling rapid jungles to the lightning-fast bullet plains, this player has showcased a kaleidoscope of skills, evolving their rating from humble beginnings in 2024 to a more robust form in 2025.

Evolution Over the Years

Starting with a blitz rating of 339 in 2024 and pushing up to 536 in 2025, Was-that-right’s game has grown stronger under the selective pressures of intense competition. Their bullet rating makes a significant leap from 115 to 510 in the same span — talk about adapting at the speed of a snap judgment! Likewise, their rapid games have matured from a respectable 551 to a shy 642, proving that with time, even the most patient of cells (or players) can divide and conquer.

Opening Genes & Gambits

Their opening repertoire is diverse and experimentally robust, showing a fondness for variations like the Queens Pawn Chigorin and various Sicilian Defense mutations. With a win rate hovering around 50% in many of these, Was-that-right doesn’t just survive the opening phase—they thrive on it. The Pirc Defense in bullet games boasts an impressive 67.3% win rate, a clear sign of some evolutionary fitness in less trodden paths.

Playing Style DNA

With an average of 46 moves per win, Was-that-right enjoys the long haul rather than quick knockouts, exhibiting a patience akin to a biologist waiting for results under a microscope. Yet, their low early resignation rate (4.12%) indicates they rarely abandon the game prematurely, showing admirable resilience. The endgame features prominently in their matches (33.45% frequency), where their strategic cellular division truly blossoms.

Tactical Adaptations & Psychological Notes

Remarkably, Was-that-right exhibits a 100% win rate after losing a piece—clearly this player has mastered the art of genetic mutation and comeback! Their comeback rate (51.68%) suggests a fighter’s spirit, while a tilt factor of 15% warns they occasionally get a little “cell-crazy” when the mitochondria misfire. A curious note: their rated vs casual games see a -50.61% win difference, maybe proving that even the cleverest can be caught off-guard by the casual environment.

Win-Loss Record & Opponent Interactions

Accumulating over 300 wins in blitz and over 660 in bullet games, Was-that-right has engaged prolifically in battles across the digital savanna. They have some clear nemeses like sidorenkocan (0% win rate) and revered prey such as cezarpinheiro and arga_sd (100% win rate). This predator-prey dynamic keeps their ecosystem balanced and ever exciting.

Optimal Conditions for Peak Performance

This player thrives in the Sunday sunshine with a 55.09% win rate and finds their peak tactical hour around 9 AM and 13 PM, where the neurons fire fresh and synapses snap sharp. Maybe the perfect time to challenge Was-that-right is during off-hours—just don’t be surprised if they snap back with evolutionary cunning!

In the grand savanna of the chess world, Was-that-right proves to be a resilient creature—always adapting, sometimes mutating, and forever evolving their way to victory. A true marvel worth studying in the wild!