Profile
Md Omar Ak Hafizon Pg is a titled chess player who holds the FIDE title of Candidate Master. Known for his rapid-fire decisions in quick time controls, he tackles each game with energy, creativity, and a healthy dose of competitive spirit. His presence in Bullet events is especially noted by fans and fellow players alike.
Preferred time control: Bullet. This fast-paced arena is where Omar’s sharp instincts and tempo tricks really shine.
Career journey
Omar began his ascent through consistent play across Blitz, Bullet, Rapid, and Daily formats, building a reputation as a fearless tactician and resourceful defender. Over the years he has logged thousands of games, learning from each clock-ticking moment and steadily climbing the ranks. He has earned the FIDE title of Candidate Master, a recognition of his growing strength and dedication to the game.
- FIDE Candidate Master
- Active competitor across Blitz, Bullet, Rapid, and Daily formats
- Peak Bullet activity and notable performances in the 2020s
Playing style
Omar plays with a bold, tactical mindset, especially in fast time controls. He loves active positions, practical improvisation, and keeping the pressure on opponents as the seconds wind down. His endgames are fueled by calculating precision and nerve under fire.
Opening and repertoire
His opening choices reflect a willingness to take initiative in dynamic lines. In Bullet, he leans on aggressive families within the Sicilian Defense, while also mixing in Caro-Kann and Pirc setups to keep opponents guessing. The repertoire caters to flexible, fast-moving games where initiative matters as much as material.
Notable recognitions
As a Candidate Master, Omar has earned recognition within the chess community for steady growth and strong results in fast events. A peak Bullet rating reached around 2470s in the early to mid-2020s reflects his potential and progress. mdomarakhafizonpg
For a quick visual sense of his trajectory, you can view an inline placeholder chart:
Overview and current direction
Your results show a mixed but generally fighting style across recent games. In the shorter term, you’ve had a small positive bump this month, but the three- to six-month window shows some unevenness. The important takeaway is to aim for consistency: keep the sharp, active play you enjoy, but shore up decisions in the middlegame and clock management to prevent bigger swings.
What you do well
- Handling sharp, tactical positions: your openings that lead to dynamic, tactical play tend to yield good results. This suggests you are comfortable navigating complex middlegames and creating practical chances.
- Opening flexibility: you have a mix of aggressive and solid choices, which helps you avoid predictability. When you pick lines that fit your style, you can outplay opponents in the middlegame.
- Resourcefulness in the middlegame: you often keep pressure and find active plans even after some exchanges, which helps you convert advantages or complicate your opponent’s task.
Areas to improve
- Consistency over time: the 3-month and 6-month trends show some declines. Focus on stabilizing your decision-making in the middlegame and avoiding unnecessary material or positional concessions that snowball into worse positions.
- Time management: ensure you allocate your clock to critical moments. When you feel pressed for time, your accuracy tends to drop—practice planning a simple two- to three-move plan to reduce last-minute pressure.
- Repertoire clarity: with multiple openings, it’s easy to drift into unfamiliar structures. Choose 2–3 reliable openings for White and 2–3 for Black and study their typical middlegame plans and common endgames so you can execute a consistent game plan.
- Endgame technique: as trades accumulate, you’ll benefit from solid endgame patterns (rook endings, king activity, and pawn structure-awareness). Regular endgame practice will translate into more conversions of advantages.
Opening performance insights
Your openings show a mix of results, with some lines performing notably better than others. Notably:
- A dynamic defense (the Alekhine Defense) has performed well for you, indicating strength in handling unbalanced, tactical positions as Black.
- Other popular choices show around average success, suggesting room to tighten preparation or to lean on more familiar structures where you are comfortable and confident.
- Some quieter, more strategic setups show slightly weaker results—these may be worth rotating out of your main repertoire in favor of lines that lead to clearer middlegame plans for you.
Strategy: select 2–3 openings you enjoy and understand deeply. Build a concise set of middlegame ideas and typical endgames for each to improve consistency across those positions.
Practical training plan (next 4 weeks)
- Identify two openings to focus on (one dynamic, one solid) and study their main plans. Create a short, printable cheat-sheet of typical middlegame ideas for each.
- Do targeted tactical training: 15 minutes per day on common motifs you encounter in your focused openings (forks, discovered attacks, back-rank motifs, etc.).
- Post-game review routine: after every game, write down 3 concrete takeaways (one strategic, one tactical, one time-management note). If you blundered, note the moment and a safer alternative.
- Endgame practice: dedicate 10 minutes, twice a week, to simple rook and pawn endings and king activity patterns to improve conversion chances.
- Time-control drills: pick a standard game pace and practice with a clock, aiming to reach move 20 with a solid plan, then reassess. If you struggle under time, add a 5-minute daily drill focusing on quick decision-making in typical positions from your main openings.
Next steps
- Lock in 2–3 openings as your core repertoire and study their typical middlegame plans and endgames.
- Create a simple post-move filter: ask yourself after each move, “What is my plan in the next 2–3 moves, and what is my opponent aiming for?”
- Schedule a weekly review of your last 5 games, focusing on identifying one recurring mistake and one positive pattern to reinforce.
- Keep a small, manageable practice routine (tactics, endgames, and one or two opening chapters) to build steady improvement without burnout.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| sometimeslwktspmo | 1W / 2L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| alph-lyla-w-lyla | 34W / 25L / 2D | |
| ralral3333 | 24W / 18L / 2D | |
| allenstuart02 | 36W / 0L / 1D | |
| Polina Karelina | 13W / 11L / 1D | |
| jdpachess | 8W / 14L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2284 | 2294 | ||
| 2024 | 2341 | 2245 | ||
| 2023 | 2278 | 2198 | 2095 | |
| 2022 | 2297 | 2304 | 2225 | |
| 2021 | 2261 | 2243 | 2225 | 400 |
| 2020 | 2178 | 2169 | ||
| 2019 | 2119 | 2021 | ||
| 2016 | 1616 | |||
| 2015 | 1477 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 201W / 198L / 35D | 178W / 228L / 30D | 83.2 |
| 2024 | 70W / 69L / 8D | 70W / 73L / 6D | 80.6 |
| 2023 | 375W / 314L / 32D | 332W / 350L / 34D | 76.8 |
| 2022 | 223W / 241L / 26D | 219W / 246L / 24D | 83.6 |
| 2021 | 278W / 175L / 41D | 251W / 200L / 25D | 78.8 |
| 2020 | 79W / 50L / 13D | 77W / 51L / 11D | 73.5 |
| 2019 | 66W / 44L / 3D | 66W / 36L / 10D | 77.2 |
| 2016 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 4W / 0L / 0D | 92.8 |
| 2015 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 42.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 28 | 35 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 25 | 12 | 11 | 2 | 48.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 19 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 73.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 16 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 16 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 15 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 441 | 217 | 191 | 33 | 49.2% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 373 | 175 | 183 | 15 | 46.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 241 | 115 | 109 | 17 | 47.7% |
| King's Indian Attack | 226 | 107 | 98 | 21 | 47.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 148 | 71 | 68 | 9 | 48.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 128 | 62 | 61 | 5 | 48.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 111 | 50 | 57 | 4 | 45.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 110 | 67 | 38 | 5 | 60.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 108 | 48 | 57 | 3 | 44.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 107 | 43 | 62 | 2 | 40.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 4.e3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.e3 O-O | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 31 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 1 |