Aaron Jacobson (aka WorriedEgg)
International Master | Blitz and Bullet Maestro
Aaron Jacobson, proudly bearing the prestigious title of International Master bestowed by FIDE, is no ordinary chess battler. Known in the chess cosmos as WorriedEgg, Aaron has cracked the code to blitz and bullet chess like a caffeinated grandmaster on a caffeine-fueled frenzy! With lightning-fast reflexes and an uncanny tactical radar, Aaron consistently dances near the 3000 rating mark in blitz, even peaking at an astonishing 3066, and shattered the 3200 barrier in bullet with a peak rating of 3217 — no small feat in these time-crunched formats.
A deep strategist, Aaron averages over 80 moves per win in their games, showing a penchant for enduring battles that tease out every last bit of endgame prowess (they’ve reached the endgame nearly 79% of the time!). While quick to resign when the situation turns bleak (early resignation rate just 2%), their comeback ability is the stuff of legends, boasting an impressive 85% comeback rate — proving they never count themselves out, even when hanging by a thread.
It’s not all serious business: Aaron’s playing style shows a balanced wink with white pieces winning over 52% of the time and a respectable near 48% win rate with black. They’ve mastered a mysterious “Top Secret” opening repertoire, playing it over 8,000 times across blitz and bullet games with a win rate that hovers near 46% in blitz and a formidable 54% in bullet. A fan of the Sicilian Defense and Reti Opening, Aaron proves to be as crafty as a fox and twice as pesky to opponents.
When not blitzing or bulleting their way through opponents (over 4,800 wins in bullet alone!), Aaron loves pushing limits with a longest winning streak of 25 games—a streak that might just be fueled by sheer determination, liquid focus, or maybe just the right playlist. Their toughest nemeses include the likes of "wonderfultime" and Daniel Naroditsky, whom they have battled multiple times in recent clashes, each game a thrilling saga of attack and defense.
Off the board, Aaron probably enjoys chess puns, chaotic analysis sessions, and might secretly chuckle at the irony of being quietly called “WorriedEgg” despite cracking open defenses and shells aplenty on the battlefield.
In short: an IM with a tank full of bullets, a blitz king with nerves of steel, and a strategist who turns tick-tock time pressure into pure chess art. Watch out world, Aaron Jacobson is spoiling for a checkmate!
Overall Performance Summary
Aaron, your recent blitz games show a solid fighting spirit with some excellent wins against strong opponents. Your strength adjusted win rate of nearly 50% indicates competitive play at this rating level. While there has been a slight dip in your rating over the last month, the longer term trends over 3, 6, and 12 months show you are maintaining a steady level with potential for upward growth.
- 1 month rating change: -5 (small dip)
- 3 month rating change: +33 (positive momentum)
- 6 month rating change: -15 (some fluctuation)
- 12 month trend positive with a slope around 11.7 — consistent improvement
Strengths in Your Games
Reviewing your recent wins, some key strengths stand out:
- Opening aggression: Your attacks, particularly with early queen and bishop activity, put opponents under immediate pressure.
- Active piece play: You often maintain control of important central squares and coordinate your pieces well in the middlegame.
- Endgame technique: Conversion of material advantage was efficient in multiple games where you forced opponents into resignation.
- Positional understanding: In games like the Queen’s Gambit Declined lines, you demonstrated good handling of structural themes and piece placement.
Areas for Improvement
Looking at your losses and time control aspects, here are opportunities to focus on:
- Time management: Some games ended due to time loss, so improving clock awareness and faster decision-making could help maintain pressure without running low on time.
- Defensive resilience: In a few losses, tactics against your king's safety and endgame conversion by your opponents were critical. Reviewing defensive techniques especially against attacks on your king would be beneficial.
- Opening theory depth: While openings like Kings Pawn and Queen’s Gambit appear frequently with effective play, deepening familiarity with common responses and traps could help avoid early disadvantages.
- Tactical calculation: Blitz requires precise calculation. Increasing tactics training could reduce oversights especially in critical moments of middle or endgame.
Practical Study Recommendations
To enhance your blitz play, consider these focused approaches:
- Practice faster opening repertoire drills to save time and gain early initiative.
- Use tactic puzzles daily to sharpen calculation skills particularly focused on pins, forks, and discovered attacks.
- Analyze your losses to understand tactical or strategic mistakes, especially in games decided by time or quick checkmates.
- Play slower games occasionally to explore complex positions deeply, which strengthens your long-term positional understanding.
- Review key endgame positions to improve technique under time pressure.
- During blitz games, actively monitor your clock to avoid time trouble.
Encouragement and Next Steps
Your consistent play and ability to win games against strong opposition is commendable. Keep focusing on steady improvement with a balanced approach between tactics, opening knowledge, and endgame skills. Your positive trend over the last several months shows your progress trajectory is promising. Keep building on that foundation with a mix of training and playing diverse opponents.
Look forward to reviewing your next set of games to continue tracking progress.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Nayaka Budhidharma | 2W / 4L / 0D | |
| Konstantin Popov | 0W / 3L / 1D | |
| Bogdan Daniel Deac | 3W / 12L / 2D | |
| Daniil Dubov | 8W / 25L / 3D | |
| Francesco Sonis | 9W / 7L / 2D | |
| Sam Sevian | 8W / 25L / 4D | |
| Mykola Bortnyk | 39W / 49L / 11D | |
| Reza Mahdavi | 3W / 0L / 1D | |
| WhooopsIDidItAgain | 4W / 10L / 4D | |
| quintquant | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Liam Putnam | 120W / 187L / 18D | |
| Andy Woodward | 58W / 183L / 14D | |
| MilkThroat | 118W / 71L / 10D | |
| Kent Slate | 93W / 85L / 9D | |
| joshuagarry | 146W / 32L / 7D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3313 | 3062 | 2417 | |
| 2024 | 2850 | 2796 | 2385 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1572W / 1140L / 185D | 1415W / 1263L / 221D | 82.8 |
| 2024 | 1169W / 910L / 173D | 1104W / 962L / 181D | 84.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elephant Gambit | 440 | 193 | 213 | 34 | 43.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 247 | 97 | 135 | 15 | 39.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 204 | 112 | 75 | 17 | 54.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 186 | 85 | 79 | 22 | 45.7% |
| Australian Defense | 177 | 67 | 89 | 21 | 37.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 159 | 78 | 66 | 15 | 49.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 148 | 69 | 59 | 20 | 46.6% |
| Four Knights Game | 140 | 61 | 57 | 22 | 43.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 111 | 64 | 38 | 9 | 57.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 96 | 33 | 51 | 12 | 34.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 643 | 389 | 219 | 35 | 60.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 366 | 223 | 132 | 11 | 60.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 363 | 231 | 120 | 12 | 63.6% |
| Czech Defense | 228 | 120 | 95 | 13 | 52.6% |
| Modern | 204 | 128 | 71 | 5 | 62.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 182 | 111 | 62 | 9 | 61.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 178 | 98 | 74 | 6 | 55.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 176 | 107 | 61 | 8 | 60.8% |
| Australian Defense | 162 | 87 | 69 | 6 | 53.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 160 | 93 | 59 | 8 | 58.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Réti Opening | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Benoni Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 48 | 3 |
| Losing | 17 | 0 |