Cesar Umetsubo: The International Master with a Tactical Flair
Cesar Umetsubo is an International Master titled by FIDE, a chess virtuoso whose games reflect a perfect blend of strategic depth and unyielding tactical awareness. Rising from a Blitz rating of 1602 in 2015 to a peak of 2467 in 2022, Cesar's journey through the ranks is nothing short of a chess epic. If chess rating points were trophies, Cesar's shelf would be overflowing!
Known for a solid win rate exceeding 60% across various time controls, Cesar’s style showcases both patience and resilience. With an average of nearly 59 moves per win and an impressive 97.81% win rate after losing a piece, it's clear that giving up is never in their vocabulary. In fact, their comeback games could make even a phoenix jealous.
When playing, Cesar shows a remarkable psychological edge with a low tilt factor and a penchant for clutch wins during late hours—particularly at 11 PM and 8 AM, when opponents might be dreaming of checkmate but wake up to see Cesar’s queen dominating the board. Monday is their lucky day with an 83.33% win rate, proving that the start of the week is prime time for chess wizardry.
In blitz, Cesar has played over 230 games and boasts a 62.5% win rate using their favorite secret weapon: an opening they guard like classified intelligence. Rapid and bullet also see excellent results, with a rapid 100% win rate in official games and bullet performance hovering near 73%—not bad for a speed-demon on the 64 squares.
Off the board, opponents either admire or dread facing Cesar. Some unlucky players—like neurisdr and nathan_filgueiras—have found Cesar’s moves particularly challenging, whereas others (looking at you, vhitanicius and kantemir-08) have left the battlefield with a perfect loss record.
In sum, Cesar Umetsubo is a master of both mind and board: a relentless competitor whose games are never short of drama and brilliance. If chess had a theme song, Cesar’s would probably be a mix of Beethoven’s symphonies and some intense battle drums—because when the clock ticks, Cesar UMET-subo prevents any checkmate from happening quietly!
Hi Cesar Umetsubo!
Great job climbing the Blitz ladder to around 2467 (2022-09-01)—your recent games show an energetic, tactical style that can overwhelm many opponents. Below is targeted feedback drawn from your latest wins and losses.
What you’re doing well
- Initiative-first mindset. In both your London-System wins and Scotch Gambit games you quickly seize space, castle long or short as needed, and launch h- and g-pawn storms that keep the opponent on the back foot.
- Tactical sharpness. Motifs like Bxc6 +, Nxf7, Rxg7 appear frequently and force errors. Your 24.Rf4! in the London win is a nice example of piling up on a pinned piece.
- Time efficiency in winning positions. When the attack is flowing you play briskly, often finishing with 60–90 seconds still on the clock.
Recurring trouble-spots
- Handling the Alapin Sicilian as Black.
Games vsneurisdrshow the line 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.c3 d5 leading to an IQP-type middlegame where your pieces end up cramped. Moves like …Na6 and early …g5 create additional weaknesses. Consider switching to the more solid 3…Nf6 or studying the French-type structures in depth. - Kingside light-square holes.
Several losses feature …g6/…Bg7 setups combined with early …h6/…g5, after which ♘f5, ♘g5, or ♗h6 land with tempo. Before pushing a pawn in front of your king, ask “Can my opponent plant a knight on f5 or g5 and how will I chase it away?” - Conversion & clock management in equal or worse endgames.
The rook-endgame losses on time show hesitation once the position quiets down. When material is level, simplify your decision tree:- Activate king.
- Put rooks behind passed pawns.
- Use the increment—play the first safe move, bank two seconds, then improve.
Action plan for the next month
- Patch the Alapin gap. Watch a short series on the 2.c3 Sicilian and create a one-page cheat-sheet with three key ideas for Black (e.g. early …Nf6, timely …d5 break, avoiding the …Na6 trap).
- Weekly “Pawn-push audit”. After each game, write down every pawn move you made in front of your king and grade it good / questionable / losing. Patterns will leap out quickly.
- Endgame reps. 15 minutes a day on rook-endgame drills (e.g. Lucena, Philidor, side-rook checks). This will convert several of those time-scramble losses into draws or wins.
- Structured tactics. You’re already sharp; now raise accuracy under 20 seconds:
- ⏲️ 10 Puzzle Rush runs per week.
- Tag any missed
intermezzoordeflectionmotif for review.
Progress tracker
Use the charts below to verify that the work is paying off:
• Hour-by-hour focus:
• Are Sunday nights really your best session?
Key theoretical reminder
If you find yourself tempted by the pawn thrust …g5 again, recall the classic principle of over-extension (see weakness). A single slow move on the flank often costs two tempi in the center.
One critical moment to review
From your loss vs neurisdr (Black):
The rook invasion on c7 became unstoppable once the c-file opened. Instead, consider 18…Rc8! keeping the seventh rank protected.
Keep up the dynamic play, add a dose of prophylaxis, and you’re well on the way to the next rating milestone. Good luck!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| universaltsunami | 7W / 2L / 2D | View Games |
| Edgar Rodrigues | 4W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| P4nduRangA | 3W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| advantageant | 0W / 0L / 5D | View Games |
| Neuris Delgado Ramirez | 0W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2467 | |||
| 2021 | 2396 | 2317 | ||
| 2020 | 2187 | 2359 | 2279 | |
| 2019 | 1853 | 2178 | 1938 | |
| 2018 | 2309 | |||
| 2017 | 2092 | |||
| 2016 | 2055 | |||
| 2015 | 2095 | 2248 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 38.0 |
| 2021 | 5W / 4L / 0D | 5W / 4L / 0D | 77.4 |
| 2020 | 21W / 7L / 4D | 21W / 6L / 5D | 82.0 |
| 2019 | 51W / 20L / 5D | 45W / 21L / 4D | 49.6 |
| 2018 | 6W / 1L / 1D | 4W / 3L / 0D | 54.7 |
| 2017 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 71.0 |
| 2016 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 64.0 |
| 2015 | 9W / 6L / 0D | 11W / 6L / 0D | 67.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Petrov's Defense | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| French Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 4.Bg5 Nbd7 5.e3 c6 6.cxd5 cxd5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 4.Bf4 Bg7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 3 |
| Losing | 6 | 0 |