Overview — Jacek Stachanczyk (YellowJacek)
Jacek Stachanczyk, known online as YellowJacek, is an International Master (FIDE) and a force to be reckoned with on fast time controls — especially Blitz. Active online since the mid‑2010s, Jacek climbed from club levels into elite blitz circles, peaking with an electrifying performance that pushed his blitz rating to the 2500 area. If you like sharp opening work, long tactical fights and the occasional cheeky gambit, you’ve found your player.
- Title: International Master (FIDE)
- Preferred time control: Blitz (fast, furious, and frequently decisive)
- Active online since: 2016 — steady rise through 2019–2025
Career highlights & milestones
Jacek’s story is one of persistence, online marathon sessions and sharp preparation. Highlights include sustained high‑performance streaks in 2022–2025, standout rapid form in mid‑2024, and a blitz peak that reflects elite tactical awareness.
- Steady rise from ~1900 to 2400+ blitz between 2016 and 2024, culminating in a 2500 blitz peak in late 2025.
- Strong rapid peak (around 2445 in 2024) showing classical handling as well as speed.
- Impressive comeback statistics — often fighting back after material setbacks.
Playing style — what to expect at the board
Expect long, sharp games. Jacek tends to play deep tactical battles, often taking the initiative with dynamic pawn structures and active piece play. Endgames are common in his scorecard — he takes fights deep: average decisive game lengths are long, and he wins many games well past move 50.
- Early resignation rate: low (2.7%) — usually fights to the end.
- Endgame frequency: high (about 74%) — comfortable in long technical positions.
- Avg moves per win: ~71 — patient and persistent.
- Comeback ability: strong — high comeback rate and reasonable win rate after losing material.
Openings & favorite weapons
Jacek loves the Sicilian family when facing 1.e4, with Najdorf and Dragon appearing often, and shows excellent results with the Scandinavian and certain Caro‑Kann lines. In bullet and daily he’ll surprise opponents with offbeat gambits like the Amar Gambit or even the Barnes.
- Main blitz repertoire: Sicilian Defense (Najdorf, Dragon, Classical), Scandinavian Defense, Caro-Kann Defense.
- Bullet & surprise lines: Amar Gambit, Barnes Defense — aggressive and practical.
- Rapid & classical tendencies: prepared mainlines and solid endgame technique.
Notable records, opponents & streaks
Jacek has logged thousands of online games across Blitz, Rapid, Bullet and Daily formats. He plays most often at night (and has a quirky “best time” listed as 03:00), with very large sample sizes that make his streaks and patterns meaningful.
Fun facts & trivia (with a wink)
Jacek’s profile is full of small charms that belong on a streamer’s highlight reel.
- Best time of day to play (statistically): 03:00 — nocturnal precision or caffeine magic?
- Psychology: Tilt factor exists (10) — even IMs grumble after blunders.
- Favorite sudden‑death trick: pulls out gambits in bullet to unsettle opponents.
- If you want a sample tactical melee to study, try this typical Sicilian skirmish:
How to follow or study YellowJacek
Study his blitz games to see practical opening choices and resourceful recoveries. Check frequent opponents and recurring openings for patterns to learn from — and don’t be surprised if you see a clean tactical finish after long maneuvering.
- Study targets: Sicilian Najdorf games, Scandinavian wins, and his endgame finishes.
- Opponents worth reviewing: ami7x, knights_b4_bishops, Jay Bonin.
- Want a quick snapshot? See the rating trend:
Quick summary
Nice session — you finished with several clean wins and a couple of losses that show clear, fixable patterns. Your strengths in blitz are piece activity, creating passed pawns and practical pressure; the recurring weaknesses are time management under tension and occasional tactical oversights in complex openings (especially when the opponent storms your king after opposite-side castling).
Games I looked at (high level)
- Win vs romanrybachok — tactical middlegame, opponent flagged in a messy endgame.
- Win vs the_real_jerome_genzling — you converted a queenside majority and used active rooks + passed pawns to win; opponent resigned.
- Win vs sindre977 — quick tactical blows early; you punished loose pieces and simplified into a winning position.
- Loss vs Osvaldo Antonio Butti — you ran into strong kingside activity after opposite-side castling; the game ended quickly after a sharp pawn break and tactical sequence.
- Loss vs Mellows — exchanged into a position where an opposing knight penetration and kingside pressure decided the game.
What you’re doing well (blitz strengths)
- Active piece play — you look for activity (rook on open files, bishop diagonals) instead of passive defense.
- Creating and pushing passed pawns — you convert space advantages into real endgame threats frequently.
- Practical pressure — you capitalize on opponents’ time trouble and pose concrete problems rather than subtle ones.
- Opening repertoire pays off — your work in Sicilian/Caro‑Kann/Scandinavian gives you many winning chances.
Recurring weaknesses to fix
- Time management: several wins were won on the opponent’s clock and several games show both players skinny on time near critical moments. You should avoid spending your remaining seconds on non-critical moves late in the game.
- Opposite-side castling king safety: when the opponent castles long (or you do), you allowed pawn storms and tactical breakthroughs — be prepared to either simplify or keep a sturdy pawn shield and pieces ready for defense.
- Tactical oversights in sharp openings: a couple of losses started with tactical sequences in the opening/middlegame where a small mis-evaluation led to quick collapse.
- Trading into unclear minor-piece endgames without a concrete plan — sometimes simplification handed the opponent counterplay instead of removing threats.
Concrete, practical next steps (what to do in the next week)
- Daily 10–15 minute tactics warmup before each blitz session to reduce basic oversights — focus on pins, forks and discovered attacks.
- One "opposite‑castling" study per session: go through 5 model games where one side castles long and the other attacks. Make a short checklist to follow in such positions:
- Who has pawn breaks (g/h/a/b)?
- Can I trade queens to reduce mate threats?
- Where is my king’s escape square and do I need to shift a rook to defend?
- Time control drill: play 5 games at 5+3 and force yourself to keep 20–30s buffer at move 20. If you fall below, resign and review — the goal is to learn pacing.
- Analyze your two last losses with a quick engine pass and then manually identify the one move where evaluation swung the most — write it down and memorize the lesson.
One tactical position from your wins (study this pattern)
Review this short sequence from your win where you exploited loose back-rank and rook activity. Use it as a mental pattern to spot similar opportunities:
Training plan (4 weeks)
- Week 1 — Tactics and pacing: 15 minutes tactics + 3 games 5+3, focus on not dropping below 30s at move 20.
- Week 2 — Opposite‑castling module: study 6 model games and practice one training game per day where either you or opponent castles long.
- Week 3 — Endgames & conversion: 10 endgame drills (rook + passed pawn vs rook, bishop vs knight in open positions) and convert two won technical positions from your own games.
- Week 4 — Opening reinforcement: pick your top 3 Sicilian lines (Najdorf, Classical, Four Knights/Cobra) and drill common middlegame plans + 5 novelties/ideas for opponents' most frequent responses.
Small checklist before each blitz game
- Clock plan: decide early if you’re playing fast or thinking deep (aim for at least 30–40s on move 20).
- King safety: if either side will castle long, mark pawn storms and queen trades as high priority.
- Loose pieces: a 3‑second scan for undefended pieces after each opponent move.
- If you’re worse: trade queens or simplify; if you’re better: keep pieces on and increase pressure.
Follow-up
If you want, I can:
- Annotate one loss move-by-move (manual + engine check) and give a short corrective checklist for that game.
- Prepare 10 tailored tactics based on patterns from these games.
- Make a short opening bullet-point plan for your favorite Sicilian lines.
Tell me which of the three you want next and which game to analyze first (you can pick Osvaldo Antonio Butti or any of the wins above).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| romanrybachok | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| the_real_jerome_genzling | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Osvaldo Antonio Butti | 2W / 3L / 0D | View |
| sindre977 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Mellows | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| kpm_pl | 1W / 0L / 2D | View |
| repeated_blunder | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| tonijo | 3W / 1L / 2D | View |
| veilofmaya | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| lagushonok | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ami7x | 16W / 17L / 0D | View Games |
| knights_b4_bishops | 9W / 12L / 2D | View Games |
| Jay Bonin | 10W / 4L / 5D | View Games |
| selide | 9W / 6L / 2D | View Games |
| Krum Georgiev5 | 8W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2097 | 2449 | 2394 | |
| 2024 | 2115 | 2458 | 2384 | 1897 |
| 2023 | 2172 | 2376 | 2386 | 1828 |
| 2022 | 2076 | 2397 | ||
| 2021 | 2037 | 2315 | 2193 | |
| 2020 | 2001 | 2302 | ||
| 2019 | 2215 | |||
| 2017 | 2223 | |||
| 2016 | 2057 | 1828 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 245W / 183L / 59D | 237W / 192L / 53D | 76.4 |
| 2024 | 335W / 220L / 55D | 314W / 247L / 53D | 72.7 |
| 2023 | 404W / 235L / 57D | 377W / 253L / 50D | 74.0 |
| 2022 | 277W / 122L / 27D | 262W / 119L / 35D | 69.9 |
| 2021 | 211W / 146L / 32D | 190W / 167L / 34D | 73.9 |
| 2020 | 170W / 133L / 21D | 151W / 156L / 25D | 65.0 |
| 2019 | 30W / 16L / 2D | 24W / 25L / 2D | 68.9 |
| 2017 | 11W / 3L / 0D | 7W / 3L / 1D | 62.1 |
| 2016 | 5W / 1L / 1D | 3W / 1L / 0D | 73.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 227 | 138 | 76 | 13 | 60.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 182 | 88 | 81 | 13 | 48.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 178 | 87 | 85 | 6 | 48.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 147 | 64 | 70 | 13 | 43.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 145 | 81 | 52 | 12 | 55.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 129 | 74 | 47 | 8 | 57.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 124 | 79 | 38 | 7 | 63.7% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 113 | 51 | 48 | 14 | 45.1% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 111 | 52 | 50 | 9 | 46.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 109 | 56 | 40 | 13 | 51.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 23 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 82.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 21 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 47.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 18 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 77.8% |
| French Defense | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 58.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 10 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 2 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |