Profile: ZeroNoctis
Once upon a time in the kingdom of pawns and castles, ZeroNoctis emerged from the shadows—not as a grandmaster overnight, but as a relentless seeker of checkmate glory. Starting with a modest 1200 blitz rating in 2011, ZeroNoctis's journey through the chess universe has been a rollercoaster ride of tactical brilliance, nail-biting defeats, and, of course, those sweet, sweet victories.
Known for a flair with the Scandinavian Defense and a habit of dazzling opponents with surprises like the Knight Variation in the French Defense, ZeroNoctis has racked up a peak bullet rating of 1898 in early 2024 and a blitz peak of 1831 just this June. This player doesn’t just shuffle pieces—they wage war with precision and a pinch of unpredictability.
Over thousands of games, ZeroNoctis has danced on the edge of victory with a blitz win rate hovering around 48%, slightly better in bullet at 50%, proving lightning-fast reflexes and cool nerves under pressure. A tactical wizard, the comeback rate approaches a staggering 79%, showcasing a resilience that would make chess engines sit up and take notes.
Gameplay style? Well, ZeroNoctis seems to prefer the battlefield of endgames, with an endgame frequency near 67%, and an intriguing average of over 60 moves for wins, meaning this player is no stranger to long, grueling duels that test patience and wit. Early resignation is rare—only about 4%—which means ZeroNoctis fights until the bitter blunder.
The psychological rollercoaster? Sure. With a tilt factor of 16, there are moments of frustration, but nothing a good cup of coffee at 11 AM (the best time to play, by the way) can't fix. Timing is everything, and ZeroNoctis leverages this to maximize wins during mid-day hours when focus is sharpest.
Memorable Moments
Just recently, ZeroNoctis delivered a stunning checkmate using the Scandinavian Defense (Modern Variation), ending a game with a daring Queen's assault at move 15—checkmate! Opponents beware: quick attacks and creative tactics are their signature moves.
Lost games are met with the grace of a true competitor; even the best have off days. ZeroNoctis takes losses as learning steps, ready to strike back in the next battle.
Opponent Chronicles
With dozens of games against rivals like chessdawgs and agnesemonaviciute, ZeroNoctis showcases both grit and skill, boasting several hundred wins across bullet and blitz formats. Some opponents return battered—others inspired to improve—because ZeroNoctis always leaves a mark on the board.
In Summary
ZeroNoctis is the quintessential chess adventurer: steady, cunning, occasionally ruthless, and always entertaining. Whether blitzing through rapid-fire bullet games or navigating long endgames, this player’s passion shines through every move, check, and checkmate. A true night owl in the chess cosmos, ZeroNoctis proves that even in the darkest hours, the Board of Battle can gleam with bright strategy.
Quick recap of the recent run
Nice streak — you’re finishing games by attack and exploiting opponent mistakes instead of dragging into long technical fights. A couple of the wins show direct tactical finishing (including a clean queen invasion to deliver mate), and you convert advantages decisively when they appear.
For a quick replay of the most recent decisive game (Black delivered a decisive queen invasion):
Opponent profile: hisenkurtishi
What you're doing well
- Direct attacking sense — you spot and use open lines quickly (pawn pushes to open files, timely rook/queen lifts) and punish opponent king exposure.
- Tactical finishing — several wins end with forcing sequences or mating nets. That's a valuable practical weapon in rapid games.
- Strong results with a few reliable openings — your Scotch and Modern Defense lines are producing high win rates. Keep these in your “go-to” toolbox.
- Practical conversion — when you win material or open the position, you tend to press the advantage instead of letting it slip away.
Recurring weaknesses to fix
- Occasional piece overloads and back-rank vulnerabilities — a few games show your opponent getting counterplay when a back rank or overloaded piece appears. Make luft and piece coordination a habit.
- Opening depth vs. weaker but prepared lines — some lower win-rates (for example with the French Defense and Scandinavian Defense) suggest you either avoid those lines or study typical plans and pawn breaks more deeply.
- Time usage patterns — you convert well but sometimes allow counterplay during the conversion phase. In rapid, spend an extra second to check for opponent tactics before committing to a capture or simplification.
- Endgame technique — a couple of wins came from opponent flagging or resigning in messy endgames. You convert material advantage, but stronger opponents will demand cleaner endgame technique; basic king-and-pawn and rook endgame knowledge will raise your conversion rate.
Concrete, short-term drills (next 2 weeks)
- Tactics: 15–20 puzzles a day focused on forks, pins and back-rank mates. These are the patterns you used to finish games — turn them into automatic responses.
- Back-rank check: in every game review, ask “is my king safe on the back rank?” If not, add one simple luft move or re-route a piece.
- Replay high-win openings: spend 20 minutes studying your Scotch and Modern Defense wins. Note common pawn breaks and piece placements you reached successfully and learn the key ideas — not just moves.
- Patch the weak lines: pick one poorly performing opening (start with the French Defense). Learn the standard pawn breaks and one clean plan for both sides so you avoid early confusion.
Game-review checklist (5–10 minutes per game)
- Identify the turning point — when did the evaluation shift and why?
- Look for any missed opponent tactics you almost missed — could you have been refuted earlier?
- Ask: was there a simpler way to win or a safer path to the same advantage?
- Save one instructive position as a study puzzle — practice it until you recognize the theme automatically.
Opening & repertoire advice
Lean into your strengths: keep using the lines where your win rate is high (Scotch Game, Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation, and the openings where you understand the plans). For lines with low win rates, either:
- Reduce their frequency until you’ve studied them; or
- Learn two clear plans (one aggressive, one safe) so you never get lost in the opening.
Example placeholders to study: Scotch Game, French Defense.
30-day practice plan (easy to follow)
- Daily: 15–20 tactics puzzles (focus on forks/pins/back-rank) + 1 rapid game.
- 3× week: 30 minutes opening study — pick one high-win line and one weak line to patch.
- Weekly: review 3 losses and 3 wins with the checklist above; extract 3 recurring mistakes and track progress.
- Endgame: 2 basic endgames (king+pawn vs pawn, rook endgame) — 10–15 minutes twice a week.
Final notes & motivational nudge
Your recent trend shows real momentum — keep the focused, tactical play and tighten up the structural/positional areas listed above. With a few targeted drills (tactics + two opening focus sessions) you’ll make that practical advantage more consistent against stronger resistance.
If you want, I can:
- Generate a daily 7-day tactics plan for you, or
- Make a 1-hour study session that fixes one specific opening (pick the opening), or
- Annotate one of the recent games move-by-move with simple explanations.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| winknit | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sondangtua | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| judge2020 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| rozhiiin2025 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| hattrick7 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| 3mr_mo7amed | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| 2000tops | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ciaofriend | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| lucammartins | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| pilocl | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chessdawgs | 10W / 13L / 0D | View Games |
| Agnė Semonavičiūtė | 15W / 6L / 1D | View Games |
| Alexandra Prado | 11W / 4L / 2D | View Games |
| sangrekatana | 10W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| davidian93 | 1W / 8L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1829 | 1945 | 1548 | |
| 2024 | 1721 | 1430 | 1461 | |
| 2023 | 1585 | 1647 | ||
| 2019 | 855 | |||
| 2016 | 1434 | |||
| 2014 | 1328 | |||
| 2012 | 774 | 1638 | 1311 | 1136 |
| 2011 | 1062 | 1016 | 1198 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 140W / 130L / 9D | 134W / 132L / 26D | 77.1 |
| 2024 | 210W / 172L / 15D | 202W / 170L / 18D | 68.9 |
| 2023 | 9W / 5L / 1D | 8W / 5L / 0D | 62.2 |
| 2019 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 54.5 |
| 2016 | 2W / 1L / 1D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 95.7 |
| 2014 | 2W / 5L / 0D | 2W / 4L / 0D | 73.9 |
| 2012 | 131W / 118L / 5D | 118W / 114L / 13D | 63.6 |
| 2011 | 8W / 20L / 0D | 6W / 17L / 2D | 53.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 69 | 27 | 38 | 4 | 39.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 69 | 33 | 34 | 2 | 47.8% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 32 | 18 | 9 | 5 | 56.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 31 | 21 | 9 | 1 | 67.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 29 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 58.6% |
| Scotch Game | 27 | 12 | 12 | 3 | 44.4% |
| Elephant Gambit | 27 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 37.0% |
| Modern | 25 | 9 | 15 | 1 | 36.0% |
| French Defense | 25 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 23 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 52.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 106 | 54 | 50 | 2 | 50.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 79 | 37 | 36 | 6 | 46.8% |
| Scotch Game | 64 | 30 | 31 | 3 | 46.9% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 60 | 26 | 32 | 2 | 43.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 47 | 26 | 21 | 0 | 55.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 47 | 23 | 20 | 4 | 48.9% |
| Australian Defense | 44 | 20 | 19 | 5 | 45.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 43 | 23 | 19 | 1 | 53.5% |
| East Indian Defense | 39 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 51.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 32 | 19 | 12 | 1 | 59.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scotch Game | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| French Defense | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 3 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |