Jose Guilherme Barria Santos - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Meet Jose Guilherme Barria Santos, a chess enthusiast who turned their passion into prowess, earning the prestigious title of FIDE Master. While their origins may remain a bit mysterious, their chess identity shines bright like a rook on an open file.
Jose is no one-trick pony — their bullet rating soared from a modest 1320 in 2017 to a whopping 2577 in 2024, hitting a peak of 2791! Blitz is their playground too, with ratings climbing steadily to an impressive 2766 projected in 2025. Rapid and daily formats have seen fewer games but still showcase solid skills and strategic patience. Fun fact: despite playing thousands of games in bullet alone, Jose keeps a steady psychological tilt factor of just 11, meaning they don’t rage-quit even after a blunder — well, only sometimes!
Their style? A blend of patience and ferocity. With an average 81 moves per win in bullet chess, Jose battles deep into endgames, where their expertise truly crystallizes. Endgames constitute nearly 73.44% of their games — talk about stamina! And let's not forget their incredible tactical awareness: a staggering 91.43% comeback rate and a win rate of almost 100% after losing a piece. Those late-game comebacks would make even the toughest grandmasters raise an eyebrow.
Opponents beware! Jose’s longest winning streak stretches to 18 games. Whether it’s facing their frequent rival brunoo2003 or taking on new challengers, Jose maintains a win rate at or above 50% in most matchups, including some memorable 100% shutouts against several foes.
Off the board, who knows? Maybe Jose spends their time plotting the next great chess opening, exploring secret strategies (all labeled "Top Secret" in their stats), or pondering if the knight’s quirky movement holds the key to world domination.
In short, Jose Guilherme Barria Santos is a formidable chess force: fast, steadfast, and tactically tricky. If you ever face them online, remember — this FIDE Master not only plays to win but plays to delight in the beautiful chaos that is chess.
Hi Jose Guilherme Barria Santos!
Great job maintaining a performance near 2800 blitz – elite territory for three-minute chess. Below is specific feedback based on your latest session.
What’s already excellent
- Opening command. You reach move 10 with 85-90 % of your clock, whether in the King’s Indian, Dutch, or Sicilian French set-ups. That shows solid preparation and confidence in your repertoire.
- Dynamic pawn play. Wing breaks such as …b5 (Taimanov game) or h4-h5 / g4 (KID & Bogo-Indian wins) regularly seize the initiative and unbalance opponents.
- Tactical alertness. Miniatures like the victory over ElHelvetico illustrate your ability to convert complications into material gain quickly ().
- Clock management. Even deep into end-games you preserve a safety buffer that forces opponents to flag, e.g. the 79-move win vs wqws.
Recurring issues to address
- King safety after pawn storms.
Two losses to Ebanine began with early g/h-pawn pushes (as White) or …f-pawn thrusts (as Black) that weakened your own dark squares. Before committing a wing pawn, ask: “Can my opponent open a file toward my king in three moves?” If yes, postpone the push or prepare it better. - Central tension avoidance.
In the Smith-Morra defeat you spent tempi on …a6 and …Bb4 and ceded d4/d5. Build a habit: every four moves reassess whether you can push, exchange, or blockade a central pawn. This keeps your pieces from drifting. - Conversion technique.
Winning positions sometimes take 30+ extra moves to finish, or slip away (Cacriefils 1-0). Drill elementary rook endings and practise converting a pawn up vs engine on low depth. - Forced-sequence calculation.
The mating shot 23…Qd2+!! you suffered in the QGD game shows a blind spot to queen invasions. When an enemy queen crosses your 4th rank, hit the mental brake and calculate at least three forced plies.
Two-week action plan
| Day | Focus | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Mon / Wed / Fri | 30 min thematic blitz from equal rook endings | Custom positions vs engine |
| Tue / Thu | Self-review one loss; label each weakening pawn move | Annotated PGN notes |
| Weekend | 10 rapid games (10|5) to slow calculation | Chess.com rapid queue |
Your stats at a glance
- Hourly win rate:
- Day-of-week trends:
- Peak blitz rating:
Study suggestions
- Model King’s Indian games by Radjabov (positional themes after …c6 & …b5).
- Classical remedies to the Morra Gambit – observe Caruana’s move order choices.
- End-game fundamentals: Lucena position & rook vs passed pawn.
- Pawn-storm timing in opposite-side castling; review Tal’s Sicilian attacks.
Final motivation
You have already beaten several 2800+ opponents and flirted with a 2900 performance. Add a dash of prophylaxis and end-game polish, and a stable 2900 blitz rating is well within reach. Keep the fire burning – just shield your own king while you light the opponent’s!
Good luck, and see you at the board! – Coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Road_to_3OOO | 3W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Mustafa Berkay Özdöver | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Vijay Srinivas Anandh | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Danila Bilan | 3W / 3L / 1D | View |
| romanmart | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nmjeevank | 2W / 1L / 1D | View |
| nxh06 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| arsha33h | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Yonathan Uritsky | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| vrml20 | 1W / 3L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bruno André Leite Martins | 148W / 67L / 9D | View Games |
| Miguel Sismeiro | 94W / 36L / 2D | View Games |
| aakash-dalvi7 | 38W / 37L / 3D | View Games |
| Namig Guliyev | 40W / 27L / 6D | View Games |
| Jonathan Gottehrer | 29W / 30L / 5D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2792 | 2716 | ||
| 2024 | 2577 | 2715 | ||
| 2023 | 2499 | 2508 | 1908 | |
| 2022 | 2591 | 2445 | ||
| 2021 | 2592 | 2512 | 2003 | |
| 2020 | 2633 | 2460 | 2269 | 2003 |
| 2019 | 2441 | 2419 | 1199 | 1884 |
| 2018 | 2263 | 2051 | ||
| 2017 | 2128 | 2017 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 405W / 281L / 53D | 366W / 321L / 47D | 83.2 |
| 2024 | 471W / 296L / 42D | 406W / 349L / 52D | 74.7 |
| 2023 | 305W / 225L / 28D | 266W / 255L / 40D | 79.1 |
| 2022 | 55W / 35L / 2D | 39W / 41L / 13D | 85.9 |
| 2021 | 345W / 255L / 37D | 304W / 300L / 31D | 76.7 |
| 2020 | 827W / 565L / 77D | 755W / 639L / 72D | 76.3 |
| 2019 | 997W / 877L / 108D | 983W / 908L / 108D | 76.4 |
| 2018 | 547W / 510L / 43D | 536W / 521L / 32D | 74.9 |
| 2017 | 599W / 536L / 49D | 575W / 593L / 45D | 69.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 537 | 275 | 246 | 16 | 51.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 489 | 258 | 206 | 25 | 52.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 381 | 181 | 182 | 18 | 47.5% |
| Czech Defense | 325 | 171 | 139 | 15 | 52.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 311 | 169 | 123 | 19 | 54.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 280 | 149 | 118 | 13 | 53.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 266 | 129 | 127 | 10 | 48.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 246 | 118 | 116 | 12 | 48.0% |
| Modern | 224 | 103 | 108 | 13 | 46.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 222 | 114 | 98 | 10 | 51.4% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 387 | 203 | 169 | 15 | 52.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 315 | 170 | 127 | 18 | 54.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 211 | 111 | 89 | 11 | 52.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 167 | 75 | 81 | 11 | 44.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 155 | 78 | 70 | 7 | 50.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 134 | 76 | 49 | 9 | 56.7% |
| Modern | 125 | 64 | 59 | 2 | 51.2% |
| Czech Defense | 124 | 67 | 52 | 5 | 54.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 110 | 74 | 36 | 0 | 67.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 105 | 47 | 53 | 5 | 44.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Semi-Tarrasch, 6.e3 Nc6 7.Bd3 Be7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Modern Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Alekhine-Chatard Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 16.7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: 3.d3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 1 |