Dmitry Gurevich - The Grandmaster with an Unstoppable Blitz Streak
Dmitry Gurevich, known in the chess world by their username Zq1, is no ordinary chess player. Earning the prestigious title of Grandmaster from FIDE, Dmitry blends deep strategic knowledge with explosive tactical prowess—especially in blitz chess where the clock ticks faster than your average heartbeat.
Starting with a blitz rating of just 1373 in 2017, Dmitry swiftly climbed the ranks, smashing records and opponents alike. By early 2022, they had peaked at a remarkable 2675 blitz rating, consistently demonstrating dominance in the fastest format of the game. With over 9,000 blitz games logged and more than 5,200 wins, Dmitry’s energy on the board is as relentless as their appetite for victory.
Not a one-trick pony, Dmitry also engages fiercely in bullet, rapid, and even daily chess, showing versatility that few can match. And while bullet may see a win rate slightly dipping compared to blitz (because hey, even Grandmasters blink), their rapid play remains solid and steady. Meanwhile, their daily chess rating is a cheeky 400—perhaps a wink to relaxation, or just a reminder that speed truly is their forte.
Playing Style and Psychological Edge
Dmitry’s love affair with the endgame is evident, with an endgame frequency soaring over 85%. Their games tend to be long, deep, and rich in complexity — averaging 73 moves per win, proving patience is a virtue even in speed chess. A remarkable 85% comeback rate after setbacks shows a resilience that would make even the staunchest marathon runner envious. And watch out around 1AM UTC, because that’s Dmitry’s best time to play, a nocturnal blitz beast awakening with the moon.
The Grandmaster’s favorite secret weapon? Well, officially listed as "Top Secret" in openings performance, it seems Dmitry prefers to keep their enemies guessing — a true master of mystery on the chessboard.
Notable Recent Performance
In their most recent victory, Dmitry showcased surgical precision in the Queens Gambit Declined, Harrwitz Attack variation. Facing tough opposition rated over 2600, Dmitry calmly outmaneuvered their opponent, ending the game with a graceful resignation after 65 intense moves. It was a display of patience, tactics, and tenacity that chess lovers dream about.
Fun Fact
Despite being a terror in rapid-fire formats, Dmitry keeps their cool with only about a 0.35% early resignation rate. In other words, they believe in fighting to the last pawn — unless, of course, the coffee runs out.
Whether storming through games at lightning speed or grinding out a slow, strategic victory, Dmitry Gurevich is a force on the chessboard who combines brilliance, resilience, and a hint of chessboard mystique. Watch out: when they say “Zq1,” expect an intellectual game full of surprises!
Overall Performance and Rating Trends
Dmitry, your recent games show a respectable strength adjusted win rate slightly above 50%, which reflects consistent playing strength against opponents of similar ratings.
Over the last six months, you've experienced a significant positive trend, improving your rating by nearly 70 points, with a strong upward slope of over 97. This shows sustained growth and strengthening in your play.
However, the last month has been challenging, with a rating drop of 46 points and a negative trend slope, which suggests some recent difficulties or tougher opposition affecting your performance. Your 12-month trend also shows a slight decline, indicating some volatility in longer term performance.
Opening Strategy Insights
Your games feature a variety of openings like the Nimzo-Indian, Benko Gambit, Sicilian Defense, and some Reti Opening variations. Here are some key points to consider:
- Strong understanding of classical and hypermodern openings is evident; however, consolidating experience in one or two openings could help deepen your opening preparation and yield better positions early on.
- Pay attention to pawn structures and typical plans in openings like Nimzo-Indian or Modern Defense. Small inaccuracies in early moves, such as timing the pawn breaks or piece placement, can create challenging middlegame positions.
- Several games show solid play but occasional tactical oversights or loss of control over key squares. Focusing on tactical motifs from your opening lines can improve your transition into the middlegame.
Recent Games - Areas for Improvement
From the detailed review of recent blitz games, here are constructive observations to help you improve:
- Time Management: Some losses were due to running out of time or nervousness during critical moments. Practice allocating your time more evenly and identifying key positions where deeper calculation is necessary.
- Endgame Technique: A few games ended in losing positions due to slight inaccuracies in endgame play. Reviewing common endgame patterns, especially king and pawn endings, rook and minor piece endgames, will add reliability to your finish.
- Tactical Awareness: Blitz games demand quick tactical recognition. Regular tactical exercises on pins, forks, and discovered attacks will sharpen your instincts and prevent simple tactical blunders.
- Positional Planning: Aim for clearer plans in middlegames to avoid passive positions. Look for improving piece activity and controlling key squares, especially in closed or semi-closed structures.
Next Steps for Growth
- Analyze your losses carefully, focusing on critical turning points where the evaluation shifted.
- Choose a primary opening repertoire to study deeply—be it Nimzo-Indian structures or Sicilian lines—to complement your style and gain confidence.
- Incorporate daily tactical training to keep calculation sharp for blitz games.
- Work on time management techniques, perhaps using some slower time controls for training to build patience and accuracy.
- Consider reviewing your games with a coach or stronger player to get personalized feedback and opening preparation guidance.
Keep up the consistent effort, Dmitry. Your growth over recent months shows your dedication. With focus on the areas highlighted, you will bounce back stronger!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hans Rath | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| caterpiller35 | 1W / 4L / 2D | |
| cholmogorov | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Bryan Weisz | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| fox1k3 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Amir Hadzovic | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| wulverine02 | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| momojojo0 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| burackchess | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| pro_king97 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alex Goldin | 9W / 26L / 5D | |
| Jordan Brewer | 6W / 26L / 2D | |
| latinamericanmeme | 13W / 18L / 3D | |
| Jovan Miletic | 22W / 9L / 2D | |
| Pranav Senthilkumar | 17W / 12L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2564 | 2333 | 923 |
| 2024 | 2191 | 2604 | 2372 | 400 |
| 2023 | 2413 | 2325 | ||
| 2022 | 2523 | 2533 | ||
| 2021 | 2650 | |||
| 2020 | 2400 | 2518 | 2529 | |
| 2019 | 2225 | 2534 | 2506 | |
| 2018 | 2512 | 2453 | ||
| 2017 | 1876 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 428W / 393L / 68D | 361W / 454L / 52D | 74.3 |
| 2024 | 692W / 556L / 108D | 627W / 644L / 100D | 80.2 |
| 2023 | 457W / 374L / 67D | 408W / 399L / 87D | 80.7 |
| 2022 | 274W / 203L / 52D | 231W / 242L / 47D | 82.6 |
| 2021 | 167W / 121L / 27D | 151W / 124L / 32D | 82.1 |
| 2020 | 329W / 213L / 46D | 305W / 226L / 55D | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 530W / 395L / 68D | 528W / 421L / 68D | 76.3 |
| 2018 | 368W / 238L / 59D | 368W / 263L / 46D | 79.0 |
| 2017 | 4W / 0L / 0D | 3W / 0L / 0D | 52.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 436 | 212 | 190 | 34 | 48.6% |
| Döry Defense | 394 | 169 | 183 | 42 | 42.9% |
| Slav Defense | 382 | 213 | 143 | 26 | 55.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 302 | 162 | 118 | 22 | 53.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 300 | 177 | 103 | 20 | 59.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation | 284 | 157 | 105 | 22 | 55.3% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 274 | 178 | 82 | 14 | 65.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 268 | 149 | 90 | 29 | 55.6% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 267 | 132 | 114 | 21 | 49.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 261 | 122 | 113 | 26 | 46.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 91 | 47 | 40 | 4 | 51.6% |
| Modern | 72 | 39 | 32 | 1 | 54.2% |
| Czech Defense | 56 | 25 | 29 | 2 | 44.6% |
| Slav Defense | 44 | 23 | 19 | 2 | 52.3% |
| Döry Defense | 43 | 14 | 23 | 6 | 32.6% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 40 | 21 | 18 | 1 | 52.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 38 | 20 | 15 | 3 | 52.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 38 | 24 | 14 | 0 | 63.2% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 35 | 11 | 24 | 0 | 31.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Semi-Tarrasch, 6.e3 Nc6 7.Bd3 Be7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoni Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 1 |
| Losing | 29 | 0 |